Expert Homework Help Online & Write My Essay Service

Hire best homework helpers for online homework help 24/7. Are you looking for online homework help? Try our excellent homework help who can help you get A+ grade in your assignment.

Order my paper
Calculate your essay price
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

19 k happy customers
9.5 out of 10 satisfaction rate
527 writers active

Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Paper

Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations PaperRough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations PaperUse the practice problem and a quantitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.In a 1000-1,250 word essay, summarize the study, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.Refer to the resource “Research Critique Guidelines” for suggested headings and content for your paper.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations PaperYou are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success CenterORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HEREQuantitative studies1st article: Elliott, R. A., Lee, C. Y., Beanland, C., Vakil, K., & Goeman, D. (2016).Medicines management, medication errors and adverse medication events in older peoplereferred to a community nursing service: a retrospective observational study. Drugs-real worldoutcomes, 3(1), 13-24.2nd article: Daupin, J., Atkinson, S., Bédard, P., Pelchat, V., Lebel, D., & Bussières, J.F. (2016). Medication errors room: a simulation to assess the medical, nursing and pharmacystaffs' ability to identify errors related to the medication‐use system. Journal of evaluation inclinical practice, 22(6), 911-920.BackgroundMedication errorsIn healthcare settings, medication errors result from faults in communication systems.The errors indicate a poor exchange of patient information between healthcare providers. Theylead to adverse and unexpected effects on patients. Medication errors occur mainly due to poornursing handoff communication and lack of coordinated care between healthcareinterprofessional teams (Hayes, Jackson, Davidson, & Power, 2015).The problem has a significant impact on the quality of care delivered in the practiceenvironment. The nurses rely on coordination of care from interprofessional teams to realizeexpected outcomes. In most cases, the blame on medication errors fall on the nurses; they areobliged to execute planned interventions and completion of physician requests on the patients.Nursing practices posses a significant impact on the whole system of care (Hayes, Jackson,QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE 3Davidson, & Power, 2015). Nursing plays a central role in the hospital communication system;exchange patient information, health needs, treatment outcomes with other professionals anddepartment for collaboration in services provision.Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations PaperThe purpose of the studies was to evaluate the awareness of healthcare providers andpatients regarding medication errors. The studies also aimed to determine the leading causescontributing to increased incidences of medication errors. They equally explore the healthoutcomes resulting from the mistakes and their impact on the organizational value. The articlesalso purposed to assess the critical interventions and strategies that can be introduced within thehealthcare settings to offer a solution to the problem and reduce the incidences of erroroccurrence.Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations PaperThe objectives of the studies are to generate sufficient evidence about the health issuefrom the healthcare environment. The studies intend to utilize available evidence to suggesteffective interventions and system changes that might benefit nurses and healthcare organizationin solving the clinical problem under discussion.Research question: For healthcare providers in healthcare units, how could increasingawareness compared to the use of a computerized system reduce medication errors to patientsduring the period of healthcare delivery?Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations PaperSupport of the nursing issueThe two presented articles provide information that conforms with the keywords used inthe PICOT question. The evidence and discussions in the materials will be used to offerresponses to the research questions. They will provide insight into the problem of medicationerrors in the clinical units. They would analyze the level of understanding and awareness ofQUANTITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE 4health professional to incidences of medication errors. The studies would be analyzed to providea comparative aspect of the contemporary interventions employed in hospitals (Elliott, Lee,Beanland, Vakil, & Goeman, 2016). The articles synthesize the understanding of contributingfactors to the problem and possible remedy strategies in reducing the recurrence of the problem,which is the main focus of the PICOT.Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations PaperInterventions and comparison groupsThe two articles championed for enhanced medicine management and integration of themedication-use system in the care settings to assist in reducing medication errors. Theseinterventions possess a synergistic effect to the ones outlined in the PICOT. Increased awarenessof medication errors enables healthcare providers to appreciate the new systems and practicesintroduced to the care units (Daupin, Atkinson, Bédard, Pelchat, Lebel, & Bussières, 2016). Theuse of a computerized system is supportive of the implementation of strategies and plans insolving the issue.Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations PaperComparison groups outlined in the PICOT involves health care providers and the patientsas recipients of the services. The articles focused on analyzing physicians, nursing, andpharmacy staffs who are healthcare providers. The patients are hypothetically presented in theevaluation of the impact of the clinical issue. Thus, all the comparison groups in both the PICOTand the studies are relative and aligning to the discussion topic.Method of studyThe 1st article utilized a retrospective observational study method for a random sample of100 people. The 2nd article used a descriptive cross‐sectional study method for a sample size of500 participants.Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations PaperQUANTITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE 5The retrospective observational method encompasses assessment of past medical recordsand interviews that involved the comparison groups in the study. On the other hand, a cross-sectional descriptive survey analyzes data resulting from the population of interest at a specificpoint in time.The retrospective observational method offers an opportunity for analysis of a variety offactors contributing to the problem under study. However, it omits the measurement of specificvital statistics, and it is affected by bias.Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations PaperDescriptive cross-sectional study results in the collection of large amounts of data; thatcan be used as precursors to future studies in nursing. But this method does not offer acorrelation of variables in the determination of cause and effect of situations.Results of the study1st articleThe study identified shortcomings in medicines management. Inappropriate use ofmedication charts and interdisciplinary medication review is evident in the survey. Improvementin strategies for medication management in healthcare settings was suggested to control andreduce incidences of medication errors (Elliott, Lee, Beanland, Vakil, & Goeman, 2016).2nd articleMajority of healthcare professionals demonstrated insufficient knowledge regardingmedication errors. Some expressed a lack of understating of the causes of the problem and itsprevention measures. The simulation was identified as the most effective tool that can raiseQUANTITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE 6health care professionals' awareness of medication errors and its resolution strategies (Daupin,Atkinson, Bédard, Pelchat, Lebel, & Bussières, 2016).Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations PaperThe implication of studies in nursingThe studies imply that nursing practice needs to be resilient in embracing andimplementing particular change interventions to solve clinical problems. They indicate thatresearch findings complement the provision of care through the introduction of new evidence-based practices. The articles suggest that healthcare organizations should be supportive in theworking environment through the establishment of new integrated systems and resources thatcould empower the nurses in managing clinical problems (Wilson, Palmer, Levett-Jones,Gilligan, & Outram, 2016).Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations PaperOutcome comparisonThe expected outcomes for the PICOT involved generation of strategies and interventionsthat could increase knowledge and awareness of health professionals to the issue of medicationerrors. It anticipated a comparison between clinical awareness and use of the computer system inreducing errors in care units. It also expected an outline of evidence-based practices inminimizing mistakes.The outcomes of the studies acknowledged a lack of awareness among healthcareproviders regarding medication errors. The reviews recommended strategic interventions tocontrol the problem and improve efficiency in services provision. The outcomes responded tosome of the expectations illustrated in the PICOT question.Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations PaperQUANTITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE 7ReferencesDaupin, J., Atkinson, S., Bédard, P., Pelchat, V., Lebel, D., & Bussières, J. F. (2016). Medicationerrors room: a simulation to assess the medical, nursing and pharmacy staffs' ability toidentify errors related to the medication‐use system. Journal of evaluation in clinicalpractice, 22(6), 911-920.Elliott, R. A., Lee, C. Y., Beanland, C., Vakil, K., & Goeman, D. (2016). Medicinesmanagement, medication errors and adverse medication events in older people referred toa community nursing service: a retrospective observational study. Drugs-real worldoutcomes, 3(1), 13-24.Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations PaperHayes, C., Jackson, D., Davidson, P. M., & Power, T. (2015). Medication errors in hospitals: aliterature review of disruptions to nursing practice during medicationadministration. Journal of clinical nursing, 24(21-22), 3063-3076.Wilson, A. J., Palmer, L., Levett-Jones, T., Gilligan, C., & Outram, S. (2016). Interprofessionalcollaborative practice for medication safety: Nursing, pharmacy, and medical graduates’experiences and perspectives. Journal of interprofessional care, 30(5), 649-654. Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Paper

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: