Expert Homework Help Online & Write My Essay Service

Hire best homework helpers for online homework help 24/7. Are you looking for online homework help? Try our excellent homework help who can help you get A+ grade in your assignment.

Order my paper
Calculate your essay price
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

19 k happy customers
9.5 out of 10 satisfaction rate
527 writers active

Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Assignment

Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Assignment Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations AssignmentWrite a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two qualitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part 1”(LOCATED IN ATTACHMENTS) document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide rationale, include examples, and reference content from the studies in your responses.Use the practice problem and two qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment(LOCATED IN ATTACHMENTS) to complete this assignment.In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two qualitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations AssignmentPrepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HEREResearch Critique GuidelinesTo write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of the research study conducted, address each component below for qualitative study in the Topic 2 assignment and the quantitative study in the Topic 3 assignment.Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, or reference content from the study in your responses. Qualitative Study Background of Study: · Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.· How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.· Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.· List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.· Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem? Method of Study:Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Assignment · Were qualitative methods appropriate to answer the research questions?· Did the author identify a specific perspective from which the study was developed? If so, what was it?· Did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? What other types of literature did the author include?· Are the references current? For qualitative studies, the author may have included studies older than the 5-year limit typically used for quantitative studies. Findings of older qualitative studies may be relevant to a qualitative study.· Did the author evaluate or indicate the weaknesses of the available studies?· Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument?· When a researcher uses the grounded theory method of qualitative inquiry, the researcher may develop a framework or diagram as part of the findings of the study. Was a framework developed from the study findings?  Results of Study · What were the study findings?· What are the implications to nursing?· Explain how the findings contribute to nursing knowledge/science. Would this impact practice, education, administration, or all areas of nursing? Ethical Considerations · Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?· Was patient privacy protected?· Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of? Conclusion · Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.· Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.· Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.· Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned.Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Assignment   Quantitative Study Background of Study: · Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.· How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.· Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.· List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Assignment· Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem? Methods of Study · Identify the benefits and risks of participation addressed by the authors. Were there benefits or risks the authors do not identify?· Was informed consent obtained from the subjects or participants?· Did it seem that the subjects participated voluntarily in the study?· Was institutional review board approval obtained from the agency in which the study was conducted?· Are the major variables (independent and dependent variables) identified and defined? What were these variables?· How were data collected in this study?· What rationale did the author provide for using this data collection method?· Identify the time period for data collection of the study.· Describe the sequence of data collection events for a participant.· Describe the data management and analysis methods used in the study.· Did the author discuss how the rigor of the process was assured? For example, does the author describe maintaining a paper trail of critical decisions that were made during the analysis of the data? Was statistical software used to ensure accuracy of the analysis?· What measures were used to minimize the effects of researcher bias (their experiences and perspectives)? For example, did two researchers independently analyze the data and compare their analyses?Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Assignment Results of Study · What is the researcher’s interpretation of findings?· Are the findings valid or an accurate reflection of reality? Do you have confidence in the findings?· What limitations of the study were identified by researchers?· Was there a coherent logic to the presentation of findings?· What implications do the findings have for nursing practice? For example, can the findings of the study be applied to general nursing practice, to a specific population, or to a specific area of nursing?· What suggestions are made for further studies? Ethical Considerations · Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?· Was patient privacy protected?· Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of? Conclusion · Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.· Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.· Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.· Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned. ReferenceBurns, N., & Grove, S. (2011). Understanding nursing research (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.Literature Evaluation TableStudent Name: Christiana Bona.Summary of Clinical Issue (200-250 words):Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations AssignmentChildhood obesity is one of the problems that affect the United States and other developed economies.  Obesity among children and youths is widely recognized as an issue that generates a lot of adverse health impacts.  For instance, childhood obesity is a major indicator of future mental and physical health problems. In spite of the highest rates of childhood obesity in the country in the last three decades, obesity has been linked to other more serious health problems such as cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. As nurses and other health professionals continue to grapple with this problem, there are still no clear treatment approaches. Health professionals usually do not have a comprehensive guideline on where to manage the nearly one-third of their populations who present the medical care with obesity that coexists with other medical conditions and problems. Numerous treatment models have been proposed to address this rising public health concern. These approaches often include use of the traditional interventions such as pharmacological interventions. However, overemphasis on one treatment intervention may fail to generate the desired objectives. While the traditional strategies to obesity prevention and management have placed emphasis on medications, wider attention to other dimensions of treatment is necessary. Such treatment interventions may include the multi-tiered or holistic strategies that incorporate both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. For instance, a wider focus should incorporate practices such as assessing the mental health impacts of obesity on the patients. Thus, a public health multi-tiered approach to obesity that emphasizes on promotion, prevention, and individualized interventions are recommended.Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations AssignmentPICOT Question: Is the use of multi-tiered approach to the treatment and management of childhood obesity more effective than overreliance on only pharmacological interventions in reducing obesity prevalence rates? CriteriaArticle 1Article 2Article 3APA-Formatted Article Citation with Permalink Cuda, S. E., & Censani, M. (2018). Pediatric Obesity Algorithm: A Practical Approach to Obesity Diagnosis and Management. Frontiers in pediatrics, 6. Heerman, W. J., Schludnt, D., Harris, D., Teeters, L., Apple, R., & Barkin, S. L. (2018). Scale-out of a community-based behavioral intervention for childhood obesity: pilot implementation evaluation. BMC public health, 18(1), 498. Bazyk, S., & Winne, R. (2013). A multi-tiered approach to addressing the mental health issues surrounding obesity in children and youth. Occupational therapy in health care, 27(2), 84-98. How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question?Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations AssignmentThe article is relevant to the PICOT question because it proposes the use of algorithms and technological systems that have data on all aspects of a child’s obesity prevention and management strategies.The study recommends use of behavioral interventions in managing and treating childhood obesity and health issues, apart from the use of pharmacological interventions.The article is directly related to the PICOT question because it proposes the adoption of multi-tiered approaches to childhood obesity management, prevalence and prevention over decades.Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?)The study uses quantitative designs because there are many quantitative indicators such as BMI, prevalence rates, and obesity comorbidities that have been usedThe research uses quantitative design because the researchers evaluate the outcomes of community based interventions quantitatively using pre-post survey, attendance rates, and reduction rates. The research provides obesity data on children between ages 0’ and 12 years.The study is mainly qualitative because it uses descriptive studies to explore the use of multi-tiered approach to obesity management and it involves 20 intervention.Purpose StatementThe study explores previous research done on pediatric algorithm diagnosis, evaluation, and management.The purpose of the study is to examine the adoption of the rigorously assessed healthier families programs by Parks and Recreation centers in three cities.The purpose of the study is to investigate the efficacy of obesity prevalence from 2013 – 2014 trend over the decade and public health multi-tiered approach to childhood obesity prevention and management.Research QuestionWhat is the effectiveness of pediatric obesity algorithm in diagnosis and treating childhood obesity?Are community-based behavioral interventions effective in treating and managing childhood obesity?Is the multi-tiered approach to obesity management effective in reducing childhood obesity prevalence rates?OutcomeThe study found that identifying and treating childhood obesity as early as possible is important as understanding comorbid conditions.The study outcomes indicate that the utilization of evidence-based childhood obesity interventions is a major aspect of combating obesity and its long-term health consequences.The outcome of the study showed that multi-tiered approach is more effective than the traditional models of managing childhood obesity.Setting (Where did the study take place?) Hospital setting, USACommunity setting, USAThe research was undertaken in public healthcare settings.SampleThe researchers selected more than 100 articles on previous studies undertaken on pediatric obesity algorithms of which 1000 children aged 6 -12 years where sampledA total of 23 parent child pairs in three partner sites were selected.The study selected a total of 1000 children to participate in the researchMethodThe main data gathering method that was used  quantitative content analysisInterviews were used for data gatheringQuestionnaires were used as the main data gathering methods.Key Findings of the StudyThe study found that pediatric obesity algorithm can help to guide health professionals with a practical and evidence-based approach  to diagnosis and management of childhood obesityThe study found that the average attendance for the program was about 7.6 per session, with 71 percent attending.Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations AssignmentThe study found that the utilization of  multi-tiered approach to obesity management is more effective than traditional models.Recommendations of the ResearcherThe study recommends families to use algorithmic tools to manage and reduce childhood obesity.The study recommends the use of community-based obesity prevention and management strategies, which can help to significantly reduce BMIs and behavior change among obesity patientsThe study recommends future investigations into the significance of public health multi-tiered approach to obesity, emphasizing on health promotion, prevention, and individualized interactions.  CriteriaArticle 4Article 5Article 6APA-Formatted Article Citation with PermalinkRankin, A., Blood-Siegfried, J., Vorderstrasse, A., & Chlebowy, D. O. (2015). Implementation of childhood obesity identification and prevention strategies in primary care: A quality improvement project. International Journal of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 2(2), 59-63.  Styne, D. M., Arslanian, S. A., Connor, E. L., Farooqi, I. S., Murad, M. H., Silverstein, J. H., & Yanovski, J. A. (2017). Pediatric obesity—assessment, treatment, and prevention: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice guideline. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 102(3), 709-757. Wilfley, D. E., Staiano, A. E., Altman, M., Lindros, J., Lima, A., Hassink, S. G., … & Improving Access and Systems of Care for Evidence‐Based Childhood Obesity Treatment Conference Workgroup. (2017). Improving access and systems of care for evidence‐based childhood obesity treatment: Conference key findings and next steps. Obesity, 25(1), 16-29. How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question?The study is related to the PICOT question because it seeks to explore culturally appropriate strategies of treating and managing childhood obesityThe article explores recommended practices and standards for childhood obesity treatment and prevention.Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations AssignmentThe study is relevant to the PICOT question because it seeks to explore ways of improving access to care for childhood obesity patients.Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?)The study uses quantitative design because there are quantitative metrics such as BMI, rates of prevalence, and the rates of increase in childhood obesityThe study uses mixed methods (both qualitative and quantitative approaches)Quantitative, design was used because the study explores changes that take place when children are provided referrals for six years for 26 contact hours comprehensive treatments.Purpose StatementThe purpose of the study was to implement childhood obesity identification and prevention guidelines from evidence-based recommendations into practice.The purpose of the research is to formulate clinical guidelines and standards for evaluation, treatment, as well as prevention of pediatric obesity.The purpose of the study was to advance the translation of USPSTF recommendations to design feasible, acceptable, and effective sustainable care for childhood obesity patients.Research QuestionDoes implementation of evidence-based guidelines and standards in healthcare settings help to reduce obesity prevalence rates among children?What are the necessary clinical guidelines that are needed for the assessment, treatment, and prevention of pediatric obesity?Can improved access and system of care reduce childhood obesity prevalence?OutcomeThe outcomes of the study was to reduce morbidity and financial burdens associated with childhood obesityThe outcome of the study was the development of an evidence-based guideline with the use of Grading of Recommendations, assessments, and development processes.Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations AssignmentThe outcome of the study included the need to provide sustainable care delivery models for evidence-based treatment of childhood obesity.Setting (Where did the study take place?) The research was done in pediatric primary care office settingsThe research was conducted within the premises of the Endocrine Society through an appointed Task Force.The study was undertaken in primary healthcare settingsSampleA total number of 80 patients were selected to participate in the studyA total of 6 experts were selected to participate in the study46 national leaders in the healthcare sector were selected to participate in the studyMethodQuestionnaires and other quality indicators were used for data gatheringBoth questionnaires and focus groups were used since it was a taskforce that comprised of 6 members who sat in a group to develop and assess standardsInterviews were used in the studyKey Findings of the StudyThe study found that practice change including childhood obesity identification and familial prevention guidelines positively reduces obesity among children.Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations AssignmentThe findings indicated that engaging experts from the Endocrine Society can help to develop effective methods of childhood obesity prevention and treatment.The survey indicated that there are multiple barriers that deter the implementation of the USPSTF recommendations. Such barriers include high operating costs, low availability, and quality of staff training.Recommendations of the ResearcherThe study recommends the implementation of evidence-based guidelines and standards in increased identification of children at risk of children at risk for childhood obesity and enhanced familial obesity preventionThe researchers recommend the need for future studies to focus on understanding ways of effecting systemic changes in food environments and total daily morbidity, including ways of sustaining healthy BMI.The study suggests the need for stakeholders in the healthcare sectors to convene intensive interactive conferences in order to develop holistic standards of care for pediatric obesity patients.Literature Evaluation TableStudent Name: Christiana Bona.Summary of Clinical Issue (200-250 words): Childhood obesity is one of the problems that affect the United States and other developed economies.  Obesity among children and youths is widely recognized as an issue that generates a lot of adverse health impacts.  For instance, childhood obesity is a major indicator of future mental and physical health problems. In spite of the highest rates of childhood obesity in the country in the last three decades, obesity has been linked to other more serious health problems such as cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. As nurses and other health professionals continue to grapple with this problem, there are still no clear treatment approaches. Health professionals usually do not have a comprehensive guideline on where to manage the nearly one-third of their populations who present the medical care with obesity that coexists with other medical conditions and problems. Numerous treatment models have been proposed to address this rising public health concern.Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Assignment.  These approaches often include use of the traditional interventions such as pharmacological interventions. However, overemphasis on one treatment intervention may fail to generate the desired objectives. While the traditional strategies to obesity prevention and management have placed emphasis on medications, wider attention to other dimensions of treatment is necessary. Such treatment interventions may include the multi-tiered or holistic strategies that incorporate both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. For instance, a wider focus should incorporate practices such as assessing the mental health impacts of obesity on the patients. Thus, a public health multi-tiered approach to obesity that emphasizes on promotion, prevention, and individualized interventions are recommended.Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations AssignmentPICOT Question: Is the use of multi-tiered approach to the treatment and management of childhood obesity more effective than overreliance on only pharmacological interventions in reducing obesity prevalence rates? CriteriaArticle 1Article 2Article 3APA-Formatted Article Citation with Permalink Cuda, S. E., & Censani, M. (2018). Pediatric Obesity Algorithm: A Practical Approach to Obesity Diagnosis and Management. Frontiers in pediatrics, 6. Heerman, W. J., Schludnt, D., Harris, D., Teeters, L., Apple, R., & Barkin, S. L. (2018). Scale-out of a community-based behavioral intervention for childhood obesity: pilot implementation evaluation. BMC public health, 18(1), 498. Bazyk, S., & Winne, R. (2013). A multi-tiered approach to addressing the mental health issues surrounding obesity in children and youth. Occupational therapy in health care, 27(2), 84-98. How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question?The article is relevant to the PICOT question because it proposes the use of algorithms and technological systems that have data on all aspects of a child’s obesity prevention and management strategies.The study recommends use of behavioral interventions in managing and treating childhood obesity and health issues, apart from the use of pharmacological interventions.The article is directly related to the PICOT question because it proposes the adoption of multi-tiered approaches to childhood obesity management, prevalence and prevention over decades.Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?)The study uses quantitative designs because there are many quantitative indicators such as BMI, prevalence rates, and obesity comorbidities that have been usedThe research uses quantitative design because the researchers evaluate the outcomes of community based interventions quantitatively using pre-post survey, attendance rates, and reduction rates. The research provides obesity data on children between ages 0’ and 12 years.Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations AssignmentThe study is mainly qualitative because it uses descriptive studies to explore the use of multi-tiered approach to obesity management and it involves 20 intervention.Purpose StatementThe study explores previous research done on pediatric algorithm diagnosis, evaluation, and management.The purpose of the study is to examine the adoption of the rigorously assessed healthier families programs by Parks and Recreation centers in three cities.The purpose of the study is to investigate the efficacy of obesity prevalence from 2013 – 2014 trend over the decade and public health multi-tiered approach to childhood obesity prevention and management.Research QuestionWhat is the effectiveness of pediatric obesity algorithm in diagnosis and treating childhood obesity?Are community-based behavioral interventions effective in treating and managing childhood obesity?Is the multi-tiered approach to obesity management effective in reducing childhood obesity prevalence rates?OutcomeThe study found that identifying and treating childhood obesity as early as possible is important as understanding comorbid conditions.Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations AssignmentThe study outcomes indicate that the utilization of evidence-based childhood obesity interventions is a major aspect of combating obesity and its long-term health consequences.The outcome of the study showed that multi-tiered approach is more effective than the traditional models of managing childhood obesity.Setting (Where did the study take place?) Hospital setting, USACommunity setting, USAThe research was undertaken in public healthcare settings.SampleThe researchers selected more than 100 articles on previous studies undertaken on pediatric obesity algorithms of which 1000 children aged 6 -12 years where sampledA total of 23 parent child pairs in three partner sites were selected.The study selected a total of 1000 children to participate in the researchMethodThe main data gathering method that was used  quantitative content analysisInterviews were used for data gatheringQuestionnaires were used as the main data gathering methods.Key Findings of the StudyThe study found that pediatric obesity algorithm can help to guide health professionals with a practical and evidence-based approach  to diagnosis and management of childhood obesityThe study found that the average attendance for the program was about 7.6 per session, with 71 percent attending.Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations AssignmentThe study found that the utilization of  multi-tiered approach to obesity management is more effective than traditional models.Recommendations of the ResearcherThe study recommends families to use algorithmic tools to manage and reduce childhood obesity.The study recommends the use of community-based obesity prevention and management strategies, which can help to significantly reduce BMIs and behavior change among obesity patientsThe study recommends future investigations into the significance of public health multi-tiered approach to obesity, emphasizing on health promotion, prevention, and individualized interactions.  CriteriaArticle 4Article 5Article 6APA-Formatted Article Citation with PermalinkRankin, A., Blood-Siegfried, J., Vorderstrasse, A., & Chlebowy, D. O. (2015). Implementation of childhood obesity identification and prevention strategies in primary care: A quality improvement project. International Journal of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 2(2), 59-63.  Styne, D. M., Arslanian, S. A., Connor, E. L., Farooqi, I. S., Murad, M. H., Silverstein, J. H., & Yanovski, J. A. (2017). Pediatric obesity—assessment, treatment, and prevention: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice guideline. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 102(3), 709-757. Wilfley, D. E., Staiano, A. E., Altman, M., Lindros, J., Lima, A., Hassink, S. G., … & Improving Access and Systems of Care for Evidence‐Based Childhood Obesity Treatment Conference Workgroup. (2017). Improving access and systems of care for evidence‐based childhood obesity treatment: Conference key findings and next steps. Obesity, 25(1), 16-29.Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Assignment How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question?Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations AssignmentThe study is related to the PICOT question because it seeks to explore culturally appropriate strategies of treating and managing childhood obesityThe article explores recommended practices and standards for childhood obesity treatment and prevention.The study is relevant to the PICOT question because it seeks to explore ways of improving access to care for childhood obesity patients.Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?)The study uses quantitative design because there are quantitative metrics such as BMI, rates of prevalence, and the rates of increase in childhood obesityThe study uses mixed methods (both qualitative and quantitative approaches)Quantitative, design was used because the study explores changes that take place when children are provided referrals for six years for 26 contact hours comprehensive treatments.Purpose StatementThe purpose of the study was to implement childhood obesity identification and prevention guidelines from evidence-based recommendations into practice.The purpose of the research is to formulate clinical guidelines and standards for evaluation, treatment, as well as prevention of pediatric obesity.The purpose of the study was to advance the translation of USPSTF recommendations to design feasible, acceptable, and effective sustainable care for childhood obesity patients.Research QuestionDoes implementation of evidence-based guidelines and standards in healthcare settings help to reduce obesity prevalence rates among children?What are the necessary clinical guidelines that are needed for the assessment, treatment, and prevention of pediatric obesity?Can improved access and system of care reduce childhood obesity prevalence?OutcomeThe outcomes of the study was to reduce morbidity and financial burdens associated with childhood obesityThe outcome of the study was the development of an evidence-based guideline with the use of Grading of Recommendations, assessments, and development processes.Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations AssignmentThe outcome of the study included the need to provide sustainable care delivery models for evidence-based treatment of childhood obesity.Setting (Where did the study take place?) The research was done in pediatric primary care office settingsThe research was conducted within the premises of the Endocrine Society through an appointed Task Force.The study was undertaken in primary healthcare settingsSampleA total number of 80 patients were selected to participate in the studyA total of 6 experts were selected to participate in the study46 national leaders in the healthcare sector were selected to participate in the studyMethodQuestionnaires and other quality indicators were used for data gatheringBoth questionnaires and focus groups were used since it was a taskforce that comprised of 6 members who sat in a group to develop and assess standardsInterviews were used in the studyKey Findings of the StudyThe study found that practice change including childhood obesity identification and familial prevention guidelines positively reduces obesity among children.The findings indicated that engaging experts from the Endocrine Society can help to develop effective methods of childhood obesity prevention and treatment.The survey indicated that there are multiple barriers that deter the implementation of the USPSTF recommendations. Such barriers include high operating costs, low availability, and quality of staff training.Recommendations of the ResearcherThe study recommends the implementation of evidence-based guidelines and standards in increased identification of children at risk of children at risk for childhood obesity and enhanced familial obesity preventionThe researchers recommend the need for future studies to focus on understanding ways of effecting systemic changes in food environments and total daily morbidity, including ways of sustaining healthy BMI.The study suggests the need for stakeholders in the healthcare sectors to convene intensive interactive conferences in order to develop holistic standards of care for pediatric obesity patients.Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Assignment

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: