Expert Homework Help Online & Write My Essay Service

Hire best homework helpers for online homework help 24/7. Are you looking for online homework help? Try our excellent homework help who can help you get A+ grade in your assignment.

Order my paper
Calculate your essay price
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

19 k happy customers
9.5 out of 10 satisfaction rate
527 writers active

Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper

Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperResearch Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperPrepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below.PICOT Question Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor.The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study). Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperResearch CritiquesIn the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique on two articles for each type of study (4 articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions.The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERERefer to “Research Critiques and PICOT Guidelines – Final Draft.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper.Proposed Evidence-Based Practice ChangeDiscuss the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes.General RequirementsPrepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperResearch Critiques and PICOT Question Guidelines –Final DraftUse this document to organize the content from your four studies into your final draft.Quantitative and Quantitative StudiesNursing Practice Problem and PICOT Question1. What is your identified nursing practice problem?2. List your PICOT question, following one of the templated formats reviewed in the course.Background1. Summary of studies. Include problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research question.How do these four articles support the nurse practice issue you chose?1. Discuss how these articles will be used to answer your PICOT question.2. Describe how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in your PICOT question.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperMethod of Study:1. State the methods of the articles you are comparing and describe how they are different.2. Consider the methods you identified in your chosen articles and state one benefit and one limitation of each method.Results of Study1. Summarize the key findings of each of the studies into a comprehensive summary.2. What are the implications of the four studies you chose in nursing practice?Ethical Considerations1. Discuss two ethical consideration in conducting research.2. Describe how the researchers in the four articles you choose took these ethical considerations into account while performing their research.Outcomes Comparison1. What are the anticipated outcomes for your PICOT question?2. How do the outcomes of the four articles you chose compare to your anticipated outcomes?Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change1. What is the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified?2. Based on this information, propose an evidence-based practice change for your identified setting.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperRubic_Print_FormatCourse Code Class Code Assignment Title Total PointsNRS-433V NRS-433V-O501 Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft 260.0Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) 3: Satisfactory (83.00%) 4: Good (94.00%) 5: Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points EarnedContent 60.0%Evidence of Revision 10.0% Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques. Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete. Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided. Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Question 5.0% A nursing practice problem is not clearly described or a PICOT question is not included.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources. PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper PICOT question articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources. PICOT question clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources.Background of Studies 5.0% Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete. Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.Method of Studies 5.0% Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is incomplete.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.Results of Studies 5.0% Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete. Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.Ethical Considerations 5.0% Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.Conclusion 5.0% Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings. Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing. Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice. Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the importance of the findings to nursing practice. Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.PICOT Question, Research Articles, and Nursing Practice Problem Relationship 10.0% Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is not included.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is incomplete or incorrect. Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks relevant details and supporting explanation.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation. Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is extremely thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive supporting explanation.Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change 10.0% The proposed evidence-based practice change is not included. The proposed evidence-based practice change is incomplete or incorrect. The proposed evidence-based practice change is included but lacks supporting explanation and relevant details. The proposed evidence-based practice change is complete and includes supporting explanation and relevant details. The proposed evidence-based practice change is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting explanation and numerous relevant details.Organization and Effectiveness 30.0%Thesis Development and Purpose 10.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.Argument Logic and Construction 10.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.Format 10.0%Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.Total Weightage 100%Research Critique Guidelines – Part IIResearch Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperOmolayo FagbamilaHealthcare and Nursing College, Grand Canyon UniversityNRS-433VProf. Cherryl Llanos06/27/2021Research Critique Guidelines – Part IIObesity is a global issue that has affected individuals of every age. Bariatric Surgery is one of the advanced evidence-based intervention to effectively manage obesity. Psychological nursing interventions provided pre and post-surgery are found to be very effective towards positive outcomes of bariatric surgery.PICOT QuestionWhether subjects undergoing bariatric surgery (P), when subjected to interventions like pre and postoperative information and guidance (I), in comparison to subjects who did not participate in such activities (C), is associated with greater weight reduction (O) over a timeframe of three months (T).Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperQuantitative StudiesBackgroundThe first study selected for this critique is the Examination of the effectiveness of a brief, adapted dialectical behavior therapy skills training group for bariatric surgical candidates. This study suggests that bariatric surgery remains one of the most valuable tools to combat obesity with promising results of reduced BMI. However, the results of bariatric surgery are considered to be temporary for a significant number of candidates as many relapses to their pre-operative weight due to a myriad of reasons. One aspect of this weight gain can be due to some pathological behavior patterns associated with excessive food consumption and therefore leading to weight gain (Delparte, et al., 2019). To tackle this, many researchers have advocated for the establishment of information, guidance, and providing support to patients for lifelong attainment of desired results of bariatric surgery. The rationale of this article was to determine the effectiveness of employing brief and adapted dialect-based therapy in terms of prolonged and persistent reduction of weight among candidates of bariatric surgery. The study hypothesized that people attending and adhering to DBT-ST in their pre-surgical period will result in better outcomes.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperThe second study which was added for quantitative critique is The Exchange of Social Support on Online Bariatric Surgery Discussion Forums: A Mixed-Methods Content Analysis. The study advocates that patient undergoing bariatric surgery can effectively manage psychological stressors through different support groups and psycho-educational interventions (Atwood, et al.,2018). The support groups provide information, guidance, and psychological support to patients to achieve favorable outcomes. This study used various online forums as support group mediums to assess the success of bariatric surgery with prolonged weight management. The rationale of this article was to evaluate the different kinds of support groups regarding bariatric surgery are found online and what is the success of these discussion groups based on the frequency of exchanging them.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperHow do these two articles support the nurse practice issue you chose?The first study addresses the PICOT question which is focused on the pre and postoperative psycho-education as a mode of informational and educational intervention of the participants undergoing bariatric surgery (Delparte, et al., 2019). A quantitative evaluation of the study is related to the improved outcomes in the case of psychological disorders compensated with bouts of eating and relapses to weight gain.The second study addresses the PICOT question and the nursing problem as it discusses the effectiveness of online support group among candidates of bariatric surgery and to assess its success by the frequency of exchanges made among the patients seeking support (Atwood, et al.,2018).Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperMethod of Study:1. State the methods of the two articles you are comparing and describe how they are different.In the first article, Delparte, et al., (2019) recruited 95 Participants from a clinic of preoperative care . The participants were exposed to online intervention after dividing them into two groups based on intervention. The first group was of a dialect-based therapy session, whereas, the other group participants were treated as per usual guidelines (Delparte, et al., 2019). The two groups were assessed post-surgically via eating disorder examination questionnaire 6.0, binge eating scale, emotional eating scale, and clinical impairment assessment questionnaire 3.0. Statistical analysis was carried out via SPSS version 23. The second study by the authors used content analysis to carry out communication evaluation . The study gathered the posted messages in the online support group. The next step of data collection was to organize the data within an organized categorical framework (Atwood, et al.,2018). The third phase of data collection was based on providing explanations for each category to assist in result formation.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper2. Consider the methods you identified in your chosen articles and state one benefit and one limitation of each method.The first study used a randomized control trial for the assessment and evaluation of the intervention. The study design is considered to be a higher hierarchy of evidence and provides grounds for establishing clinical intervention. However, the first selected study only recruited 95 participants. The sample size of the recruited population is not large enough to generalize the results (Delparte, et al., 2019). The second study used content analysis. This mode of research enabled the researcher to interpret and record communicable data into categories and patterns and is used to derive purposes behind communicative content. However, unlike randomized control trial, results obtained from the content analysis are not reliable for clinical intervention. The data and results of content analysis are highly prone to errors and form no theoretical base (Atwood, et al.,2018).Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperResults of Study1. Summarize the key findings of each study in one or two comprehensive paragraphs .The study showed the frequency and severity of eating disorders after individual undertake DBT presented with higher levels of eating disorders of 30% in comparison to 28% of the control group, however, there was a dramatic reduction in binge eating disorder of 19% in comparison to 27% leading to better outcomes of bariatric surgery (Delparte, et al., 2019). The second study showed that out of a total of 1412 messages posted in online support groups, 84.2% were seeking and providing social support, indicating the effectiveness in providing support to patients. Most of the posts in the pre-surgical period were related to emotional support 49% and information 38.9%. the data collected and analyzed showed that the frequency of exchange of online support groups has provided a forum for emotional support, information, sympathy, and willingness to help that has led to better outcomes of bariatric surgery (Atwood, et al.,2018).Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper2. What are the implications of the two studies you chose in nursing practice?Both the studies adopted different modes of educational and support interventions for patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The first study showed variable results in the improvement of poor determinants of weight outcomes after bariatric surgery. The researcher suggests that the duration of 8 weeks is optimum for desired outcomes therefore an intervention based on 8 weeks’ education would be suitable before and after bariatric surgery (Delparte, et al., 2019). The second study provided results based on content analysis which remains an unreliable source of testing efficacy but the presence of online support groups can provide sympathy, information, and emotional support (Atwood, et al.,2018). This mode of intervention will not be the basis of any treatment but there remains no harm in joining online mediums as a support group .Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperOutcomes Comparison1. What are the anticipated outcomes for your PICOT question?The anticipated outcome for PICOT comparison was better and promising outcomes associated with bariatric surgery patients when exposed to interventions like guidance and informational assistance through psychoeducation and support groups. The question aimed to contrast the interventional group against a control group and study a comparative efficacy.2. How do the outcomes of your chosen articles compare to your anticipated outcomes?The first study in comparison to the PICOT question provided variable outcomes. Unlike the PICOT question, the first study found no significant relationship among the two cases and control groups (Delparte, et al., 2019). However, the study suggested a reduction of binge eating disorders in post-surgical patients. The second study used content analysis and suggested that online support groups are highly common among patients seeking emotional support through before and after bariatric surgery (Atwood, et al.,2018) however, due to the nature of the study, the efficacy of this intervention stays undetermine d.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperReferencesAtwood, M. E., Friedman, A., Meisner, B. A., & Cassin, S. E. (2018). The exchange of social support on online bariatric surgery discussion forums: A mixed-methods content analysis. Health communication, 33(5), 628-635.Delparte, C. A., Power, H. A., Gelinas, B. L., Oliver, A. M., Hart, R. D., & Wright, K. D. (2019). Examination of the effectiveness of a brief, adapted dialectical behavior therapy-skills training group for bariatric surgical candidates. Obesity surgery, 29(1), 252-261.Hello Omolayo,It was great to see your thoughts and ideas as you organized the research for your quantitative writing assignment.You presented several good points as you summarize each study’s background.It was also nice to see your discussion on your PICOT question, and support of each article. Please include further discussion on your PICOT intervention and comparison to each article intervention.. This is a critical component of the paper.The discussion on each research method starts off well, please remember to identify if quantitative.You did a good job discussing the findings and nursing implications. Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperYou also presented a detailed discussion on the anticipated outcomes.Please remember to include your concluding points to wrap up your critique!Please see above for additional feedback noted in my bubble comments. Also, continue to review APA guidelines; you are presenting good efforts overall. Please refer to the APA essay template to assist in writing your paper. You are using the critiquing guidelines handout. I hope the corrections will be of help to you as you prepare for your Final Critique.Nice job overall Omolayo!- Cherryl Llanos, MSN RN�Good efforts here; however please note this is only a handout to be used as an outline to assist in writing your essay. Please use the APA 7th edition template to format your essay,�Please change title of paper to reflect your research�In patients�Good job including your PICOT�Nice job presenting the study’s background. �Here you effectively presented the purpose and significance of the second study.Nice job presenting the study’s background. Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper� PAGE # “‘Page: ‘#’�’” ��APA is quite specific about the formatting of the document, including titles, page headers etc.Essays must be double-spaced. Review your marginsFor more help click here: � HYPERLINK “http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/” o “Click here.” ��http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/��Clear points provided on each articles relation to your PICOT. Please include further discussion on your PICOT interventions and article interventions.�Good start here, what was the specific method used to conduct the study?Qualitative or quantitative and further supporting details. �Good start here, what was the specific method used to conduct the study?Qualitative or quantitative and further supporting details. �Good start here, what was the specific method used to conduct the study?Qualitative or quantitative and further supporting details. � The benefits and limitations have been well noted. �APA is quite specific about the formatting of the document, including titles, page headers etc. You are presenting great efforts here.For more help click here: �HYPERLINK “http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/” o “Click here.”��http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/�Please review throughout.�You provided key detail on both research results and their implications!Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper�Good job pointing out your PICOT outcome.�The outcomes have been clearly discussed. Good job here!Literature Evaluation TableStudent Name: Omolayo FagbamilaSummary of Clinical IssueObesity is now presenting itself as an epidemic in both developed and underdeveloped nations. The condition is rising in developing countries despite having a long dates history of malnutrition and undernutrition in many of these states. How obesity imposes health threats is a wide discussion on its own, but the condition is associated with significantly poor health with progressing time, the associated financial burden cannot be ignored, and most important of all, the condition predisposes individual to greater risks of death.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper. The etiology of the disease is vast and is most frequently associated with abnormal eating patterns and a sedentary lifestyle. Other conditions that can lead to obesity are hyperglycemia, hypertension, and other heart diseases. However, the disease prognosis is very unfortunate as many individuals suffering from obesity proceed to life-threatening health conditions. To reduce such consequences, advances in the medical field led to procedures like bariatric surgery to effectively manage obesity. Unlike traditional methods of obesity management by lifestyle training, bariatric surgery results have been more fast and promising. The phenomenon of the surgical procedure relies on surgical alterations of the digestive tracks leading to altered bowel habits and reduced surface area for nutrient uptake. Like other surgical procedures, bariatric surgery requires considerable medical evaluation of an individual to minimize the risk of adverse effects of the procedure. Although bariatric surgery enables an individual to attain desired goals more rapidly, the patient must adhere to healthy lifestyle modifications to sustain these changes for longer.PICOT QuestionWhether subjects undergoing bariatric surgery (P), when subjected to interventions like pre and postoperative information and guidance (I), in comparison to subjects who did not participate in such activities (C), is associated with greater weight reduction (O) over a timeframe of three months (T).Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperCriteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3APA-Formatted Article Citation with Permalink Atwood, M., David, L., & Cassin, S. (2017). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for bariatric surgery patients. Metabolism and Pathophysiology of Bariatric Surgery, 595-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12- 804011-9.00061-3https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28795980/Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper Cheroutre, C., Guerrien, A., & Rousseau, A. (2020). Contributing of cognitive-behavioral therapy in the context of bariatric surgery: A review of the literature. Obesity Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04627-9https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32440777/ L. Moore, R. (2016). General surgery procedures in the obese patient with and without a history of bariatric surgery. Bariatric Surgery Complications, 119- 126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43968-6_12https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319- 43968-6_12How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question? This literary evidence shows the association amid the efficiency of cognitive and behavioral management interventions to achieve success overeating disorders in patients who may undergo bariatric surgery. This shows that the reviewed article addresses the PICOT question as it addresses the efficiency of cognitive-behavioral management techniques among the population of obese individuals that are in preoperative care of bariatric surgery.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper The PICOT question is addressed as included study observes if managing eating disorders through cognitive and behavioral intervention results in the prolonged accomplishment of the surgical procedure.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper The PICOT question is addressed as included study studies an association between TPE in patients of preoperative stage and improved quality of life in obese subjects.Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?) The article quantitatively derived the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral management intervention in patients listed for bariatric surgical procedure. This article quantitatively studied the usefulness of conducting cognitive-behavioral therapy among participants undergoing a bariatric surgical procedure.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper A qualitative method was adopted for this study as no numerical value was given in outcomes.Purpose Statement The purpose statement of the study is prescribed as the efficiency of cognitive and behavioral management options in minimizing obesity and associated conditions in patients with an eating disorder.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper the purpose statement of the study is prescribed as the efficiency of cognitive and behavioral management and improved results after bariatric surgery the purpose statement of the study is prescribed as the efficiency of the TPE program and associated postoperative resultsResearch Question Through what mechanism does cognitive-behavioral management techniques lead to reduce the frequency of eating disorders Will managing behavioral and cognitive stimulations of an eating disorder will be associated with prolonged desired results of bariatric surgery. Is inducing TPE in preoperative stages of bariatric surgery will lead to improved outcomes in patientsOutcome For subjects that underwent cognitive and behavioral management, a reduction in body mass index was observed.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper Cognitive and behavioral management intervention led to a significant reduction observed in the weight of the subjects. Additionally, other outcomes were improved mental and psychological health of the subjects, reduced abnormal eating disorders, and improved quality of life. The intervention resulted in better life quality among the subjects when implied in the preoperative stage of surgical management.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperSetting(Where did the study take place?) The reviewed study was carried out in Norway. The setting was at various centers in the Netherlands This study was conducted in a hospital for obesity management in ItalySample The sampling included both genders, with 33 males and 69 females A samples size of 128 participants was selected A sample size of 159 participants was selected; additionally, all the subjects diagnosed with eating disorders.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperMethod The study design was parallel RCT RCT The study was initially conducted by completing the symptom checklist followed by a scale for eating disorders. Lastly, the form for the health survey was filled.Key Findings of the Study A decreased incidence of abnormal eating reduced with a reduction in weight and depression was observed as early as 10 weeks. The study could not be completed, and no conclusions were drawn The study observed that improvements in weight and improvements in mental health were seen as early as 8 weeks after initiation of TPE.Recommendations of the Researcher The researcher advises conducting more precise research that evaluates if the reduction in abnormal eating disorder leads to improved results after the bariatric surgery.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper The researcher will aim to study the effects of intervention in both preoperative and postoperative settings. The researchers suggested a need to carry out the importance and effectiveness of personalized management via TPE interventions.Criteria Article 4 Article 5 Article 6APA-Formatted Article Citation with Permalink Taube-Schiff, M., Yufe, S., Dettmer, E., D’Agostino, N. M., & Sockalingam, S. (2016). Bridging the gap: Patient experiences following the transfer of care from a pediatric obesity management program to an adult bariatric surgery program. Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care, 11(2), 67- 72. https://doi.org/10.1089/bari.2015.0048https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/bari.2015.004 8Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper Willmer, M., & Salzmann-Erikson, M. (2017). The only chance of a normal weight life a qualitative analysis of online forum discussions about bariatric surgery. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9520 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201906/ Paul, L., van der Heiden, C., & Hoek, H. W. (2017). Cognitive-behavioral therapy and predictors of weight loss in bariatric surgery patients. Current opinion in psychiatry, 30(6), https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/wk/yco/2017/00000030/00000006/art00013 474-479.How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question? This evidence reviewed the efficiency of support groups among the patient of bariatric surgery and its relationship with reduced weight and a better lifestyle, therefore, meets the PICOT question. This article is in accordance with the PICOT question as it addresses both the pre and postoperative stage of bariatric surgery and online discussion. This article is in the guidelines of the PICOT question as this study also evaluated the significance of cognitive and behavior therapy modalities and associated weight reduction in the preoperative stage of bariatric surgery.Quantitative, Qualitative(How do you know?) Research methodology explains that the qualitative research method is used to collect and analyze the data. The qualitative research method is used as it is mentioned in the article. The quantitative research method is being followed in this study as it follows an experimental study design.Purpose Statement The study purpose was to determine the efficiency of support group programs in reducing weight among patients of bariatric surgery. This study purpose statement comprised of a collection of views and thoughts via the online medium in preoperative and postoperative stages of bariatric surgery.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper The purpose of the study is to evaluate if cognitive and behavior therapy is associated with stable weight or reduction in weight in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.Research Question What is the efficiency of support group-based programs in the psychological condition of obese subjects undergoing bariatric surgery, and how it can be associated with an improved lifestyle? What are the thoughts and experiences of bariatric surgery subjects collected via online platforms? Whether cognitive and behavior management is associated with stabling and reducing the weight before bariatric surgeryOutcome Group settings lead to healthy lifestyle promotion among subjects Variable response of bariatric surgery was seen in different people, a suggestion of mixed lifestyle improvement 20 – 30% individual reach weight stabilizationSetting(Where did the study take place?) The setting was conducted in the UK.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper The research was carried out via online forums The study was conducted in Philadephia, USSample A sample population of diagnosed 20 obese subjects was collected A sample included of 498 online posts was collected Not mentionedMethod Open-ended semi-structured interview with one individual at a time A cross-sectional study design was adopted Systematic reviewKey Findings of the Study A support group program can empower subjects in making healthy lifestyle choices resulting in reduced weight and prolonged health. Many participants expected a new and healthier life after surgery without making lifestyle modification. Cognitive and behavioral management is associated with reduced weight preoperatively, and when continued after surgery, a more healthy life can be achieved.Recommendations of the Researcher More precise research on group-based efficiency in bariatric surgery was recommended.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper It is pivotal that subjects of bariatric surgery must have approachable standards of care. The researches suggest that cognitive and behavior therapy can reduce the risk of further poor health.Omolayo,You did a good job overall on your Module 1 assignment! You selected a good topic and did a nice job describing the problem. You also did a good job developing your PICOT question.You also did a good job selecting articles to help in your proposed research.Please see my additional balloon comments noted throughout the paper above for feedback. Also, please remember to review the assignment guidelines and rubric completely to make certain all points are included. As you review the research method, please remember to include the specific method and detail used to conduct the research. Once the method used is identified, such as qualitative, then you can state interviews, or observational.Continue to review APA 7th edition guidelines to assist in your formatting; you are doing a good job overall. I hope the corrections will be of help to you for next writing assignment. Once again, nice job! – Cherryl Llanos MSN, RN�Blue ink not required.�In patients�education�patients�� PAGE # “‘Page: ‘#’�’” �Page: 2��APA is quite specific about the formatting of the References. Good efforts noted here.Please review formatting of the permalinks. .For more help click here: �HYPERLINK “http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/05/” o “Click here.”��http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/05/�Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper �You provided a good explanation of each article’s relation to the PICOT �Good job thus far identifying type of research �Purpose statements have been well stated. �Good job identifying the research questions. This will assist in your future critiques �Outcomes also presented well �Remember to be more specific. Provide research setting in regards to center, unit, clinic, etc.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper�Good�Good start here, what was the specific method used to conduct the study?Qualitative or quantitative and further supporting details.�Findings have been discussed and key points noted �Recommendations have also been well presented �Good research articlesReview formatting of the permalinks�Good supporting detail noted here as you further explain support of this research to the PICOT question. �h22 �Purpose statements have been well stated here.  �Good job identifying the research questions for these articles. This will also assist in your future critiques for the course.  �Outcomes well noted.  �Remember to be more specific. Provide research setting in regards to center, unit, clinic, etc. �Good start here, what was the specific method used to conduct the study?Qualitative or quantitative and further supporting details.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper�researchers�Overall, good job selecting your articles for the article search!Research Critique Guidelines – Part IOmolayo FagbamilaGrand CanyonNRS-433VCherryl Llanos06/20/ 2021Research Critique Guidelines – Part IQualitative StudiesBackground of StudyStudy 1:Article 1, I chose for this critique is the only chance of normal weight life: a qualitative study of online forum discussions about bariatric surgery . This article elaborates that bariatric surgery is the only effective treatment to lose weight for severe obesity. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is one of the most common methods used in bariatric surgery. Even if lifelong lifestyle changes are required, patients still have many unrealistic expectations from the bariatric surgery and expect a miracle cure. One of the major problems is that most patients get information about their bariatric surgery through online platforms but do not seek education from nurses and contact those who have had the surgery to get information(Taube et al., 2016). This study aims to demonstrate shared feelings, thoughts, and values of patients attained who wants to undergo bariatric surgery through a web-based forum. The research question addressed in this study is: What are the thoughts and experiences of bariatric surgery subjects collected via online platforms? The outcome is the variable response of bariatric surgery seen in different people, suggesting mixed lifestyle improvement.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperStudy 2:The second study I choose is “Bridging the gap: Patient experiences following the transfer of care from a pediatric obesity management program to an adult bariatric surgery program,” in which themes are identified to check the experience of a base of young adults whose age ranges from 18 years 24 years. These are the adults who transfer their care from a pediatric management program of obesity to an adult bariatric surgery program. This study aims to understand the developmental needs of obese adults and how it impacts their experiences of the transition process(Willmer & Salzmann-Erikson, 2018). The research question of this article discusses the efficiency of support group-based programs in the psychological condition of obese subjects undergoing bariatric surgery and how it can be associated with an improved lifestyle. The outcome of the study is the group settings that lead to healthy lifestyle promotion among subjects.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperHow do these two articles support the nurse practice issue you chose?1. The nurse practice issue I choose is the pre and post stages of bariatric surgery . Article 1 is in accordance with the selected nursing issue as it addresses both the pre and postoperative stage of bariatric surgery and online discussion.2. My second article is about the nurse practice issue about checking the efficiency of support group. This evidence from the study reviewed the efficiency of support groups among the patient of bariatric surgery and its relationship with reduced weight and a better lifestyle, therefore, meets the research goal of the selected nursing problem.Method of Study:1. In the first article, a cross-sectional observational method was used for qualitative analysis of the contents. In this study, online discussion forums were used to collect the information about bariatric surgery experiences with 498 posts. These posts were saved in a document and were available to the participants for reading. One of the benefits of a cross-sectional observational study is that it is easy to conduct and can measure the prevalence of all the required factors. The limitation of this method is that no evidence of a temporal relationship exists between outcomes and exposures as both parameters are assessed simultaneously. The other limitation was that the patient’s age, gender, and occupation were not known through google forms.2. In the second article , seven young adults were selected who transformed their management care program of obesity from pediatric to adult healthcare. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with these bariatric patients. The ground theory approach was used, and analysis was done by constant comparative analysis. The benefit of a semi-structured interview is that questions can be prepared beforehand, and the participants are allowed for open-ended responses. The limitation is that it is very time-consuming to conduct open-ended interviews.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperResults of Study1. Study 1 showed that the patients who underwent surgery had very unrealistic and high expectations and believe that surgery will change their lives. Key findings are that Many participants expected a new and healthier life after surgery without making lifestyle modifications. Nurses can educate the patient before the conduction of surgery about the real scenarios so that they do not expect unrealistic outcomes. The nurse also provides information to the patient about a healthy lifestyle and changes they need to adapt to achieve it.2. The second study showed that a support group program could empower subjects in making healthy lifestyle choices resulting in reduced weight and prolonged health. It also demonstrates that the adults regarding the transition process experience negative and positive aspects. Key findings are that a support group program can empower subjects in making healthy lifestyle choices resulting in reduced weight and prolonged health. Nurses can conduct programs in providing health education for a healthy lifestyle. Nurses also help to eliminate the negative thoughts of patients regarding the transition process.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperEthical Considerations1. While carrying out qualitative research, some important ethical concerns should be taken into consideration. First of all, informed consent should be provided to the participants, and the person who is conducting the research should follow these rules. Secondly, the privacy and confidentiality of the participant should be respected(Arifin, 2018).2. In the first study, the ethical considerations are followed properly as no personal information such as occupation, personal identities were uncovered. Moreover, the online Google forum was designed in such a way that participants felt very comfortable expressing their feelings and thoughts. In the second study, participants were ensured that their personal information would be kept safe, and permission was taken from them before recording their interview.ReferencesArifin, S. R. M. (2018). Ethical considerations in qualitative study. International Journal of Care Scholars, 1(2), 30-33.Taube-Schiff, M., Yufe, S., Dettmer, E., D’Agostino, N. M., & Sockalingam, S. (2016). Bridging the gap: Patient experiences following transfer of care from a pediatric obesity management program to an adult bariatric surgery program. Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care, 11(2), 67-72.Willmer, M., & Salzmann-Erikson, M. (2018). ‘The only chance of a normal weight life’: A qualitative analysis of online forum discussions about bariatric surgery. Plos one, 13(10), e0206066.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperHello Omolayo,Several of your ideas came together well for the Module 2 writing assignment.Please remember to introduce the critique to provide overall thesis of the paper. You did a good job overall presenting your findings on each study.You did a nice job overall summarizing each study’s background. However, it is important to cite the articles throughout in order to clarify your points.You also presented good rationale on how the two articles support the nurse practices issue you chose. Please also remember to include your specifically developed PICOT question to compare with those in the articles. This is a critical component of the paper.Your reviews of each study’s research method presented well. However, please cite the sources of information.You also did a good job discussing the research results, and the nursing implications. However, please cite the sources of information.The ethical considerations were reviewed. However, please cite the sources of information.Please remember to include concluding points to help wrap up your key findings in conducting your critique. Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment PaperPlease see above for additional feedback noted in balloon comments throughout.Also, continue to review APA 7th edition guidelines to assist in formatting. You are presenting good efforts overall. Please refer to the GCU APA 7th edition essay template and guidelines to assist you.I hope the corrections will be of help to you for future writing assignments. Please remember to review the assignment guidelines and rubric to make certain all points are included as you prepare for the Week 3 quantitative critique. Remember to use the additional assignment guidelines presented as an attachment on the assignment criteria page. Nice job overall Omolayo! – Cherryl Llanos�Good efforts here; however please note this is only a handout to be used as an outline to assist in writing your essay. Please use the APA 7th edition template to format your essay,�Good efforts here; however please note this is only a handout to be used as an outline to assist in writing your essay. Please use the APA 7th edition template to format your essay,�� PAGE # “‘Page: ‘#’�’” ��APA is quite specific about the formatting of the document, including titles, page headers etc.Essays must be double-spaced, have 1 inch margins, include a Title Page, Main Body, and References sections.For more help click here: � HYPERLINK “http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/” o “Click here.” ��http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/��Please remember to avoid using first person in academic writing. Here you can use “the author” or “the writer” when referring to yourself.Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper�� PAGE # “‘Page: ‘#’�’” ��APA is quite specific about the formatting of the document, including titles, page headers etc.Essays must be double-spaced, have 1 inch margins, include a Title Page, Main Body, and References sections.For more help click here: � HYPERLINK “http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/” o “Click here.” ��http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/��Please remember to avoid using first person in academic writing. Here you can use “the author” or “the writer” when referring to yourself. �Nice job presenting each study’s background. �What is your specific PICOT question? Please remember to include your specifically developed PICOT question as this is a critical component of your critiques.�Also, further discussion is needed on each articles interventions, comparison and to your PICOT interventions. Please remember to review the assignment guidelines and rubric to make certain all points are included. �Please cite the article specifically.�Please cite the article specifically.�Good points presented here regarding the method of research used for both studies. The benefits and limitations have been well noted.  �Please cite the article specifically.�Please cite the article specifically.�You provided key detail on both research results and their implications!Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper�Please cite sources of information.Good job overall discussing the ethical considerations �� PAGE # “‘Page: ‘#’�’” �Page: 4��APA is quite specific about the formatting of the References. Good efforts noted here.The format for each entry depends on the source (book, interview, etc.). The References page should appear on a new page, and be formatted quite specifically.For more help click here: �HYPERLINK “http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/05/” o “Click here.”��http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/05/�Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Assignment Paper

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: