Expert Homework Help Online & Write My Essay Service

Hire best homework helpers for online homework help 24/7. Are you looking for online homework help? Try our excellent homework help who can help you get A+ grade in your assignment.

Order my paper
Calculate your essay price
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

19 k happy customers
9.5 out of 10 satisfaction rate
527 writers active

Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment

Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark AssignmentResearch Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark AssignmentDetails:Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the Topic 1, 2, and 3 assignments and the guidelines below.PICOT Statement Revise the PICOT statement you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment.The final PICOT statement will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark AssignmentResearch CritiquesIn the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique. Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of the study by making appropriate revisions.ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HEREThe completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT statement.Refer to “Research Critique Guidelines.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark AssignmentProposed Evidence-Based Practice ChangeDiscuss the link between the PICOT statement, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes.Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment                                                  RUBRICS  Benchmark – Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft 1Unsatisfactory0.00% 2Less than Satisfactory75.00% 3Satisfactory83.00% 4Good94.00% 5Excellent100.00%60.0 %Content 5.0 % Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Statement A nursing practice problem is not clearly described and/or a PICOT statement is not included.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources. PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources. PICOT statement articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources. PICOT statement clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources.5.0 % Background of Study Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.5.0 % Method of Study Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete. Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.5.0 % Results of Study Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete. Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.5.0 % Ethical Considerations Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.5.0 % Conclusion Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings. Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing. Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice. Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the findings importance to nursing practice. Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.10.0 % Evidence of Revision Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques. Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present. Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided. Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.10.0 % PICOT Statement, Research Article, and Nursing Practice Problem Link (C. 2.2) Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is not included. Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is incomplete or incorrect. Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks relevant details and supporting explanation. Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation. Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is extremely thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive supporting explanation.10.0 % Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change (C. 3.2) The proposed evidence-based practice change is not included. The proposed evidence-based practice change is incomplete or incorrect.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks relevant details and supporting explanation. The proposed evidence-based practice change is included but lacks supporting explanation and relevant details. The proposed evidence-based practice change is complete and includes supporting explanation and relevant details. The proposed evidence-based practice change is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting explanation and numerous relevant details.30.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 10.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.10.0 % Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.10.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.10.0 %Format Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment5.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.5.0 % Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 % Total Weightage Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark AssignmentQualitative Article CritiqueSummary of Article TopicIn “A qualitative study on hypertensive care behavior in primary health care settings in Malaysia” Shima, Farizah, and Majid (2014) explore the issue of hypertension. In particular, the study conducted in Malaysia focused on understanding the behavior of hypertensive patients in primary healthcare facilities. In this qualitative study, the authors seek to understand patients’ experiences with their health conditions as well as explore the various reasons that cause them not to adhere to the recommended care plans. Some of the hypertensive care recommendations usually include diet changes, physical activity, and antihypertensive medication intake (Burns & Grove, 2011).Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark AssignmentBackground of StudyHypertension, a condition associated with abnormally high blood pressure, is responsible for the loss of many lives throughout the world each year. It is possible for a person to have a high blood pressure without being aware of it because its signs and symptoms are not easily noticeable. With proper management of the condition, it is possible to avert fatalities associated with the condition. In addition, early diagnosis and regular health checkups can greatly help to promote proper management. To control and manage hypertension effectively, it is important to identify and manage the lifestyle risk factors associated with the condition as that helps to lower blood pressure, thereby significantly improving health outcomes. This study aimed to study the experiences of patients with hypertension and to establish the reasons that cause them not to adhere to the recommended care plans (which include diet changes, taking medication for hypertension, and engaging in exercises) in primary healthcare facilities. Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment. The reader should care about this study because in most cases hypertension does not have noticeable symptoms. However, with early diagnosis, it is possible to manage it effectively and to avert possible fatalities from the condition. Of the known hypertensive patients in Malaysia, 78.4 percent of them stated that they were on oral antihypertensive medications. Having a high number of people on medication significantly increases the overall cost of health care in a country such as Malaysia. Shima, Farizah, and Majid (2014) have not explicitly provide the questions for this study; nevertheless, it is possible to infer the questions from the answers. In this case, the researchers aimed to find out how the participants think and feel with regard to their behavior and their medications as far as their hypertensive conditions are concerned. I consider the purpose and research questions of this study to be well related.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark AssignmentMethod of StudyShima, Farizah, and Majid (2014) used in-depth interviews, which involved 25 with hypertension who were attached to 9 government primary healthcare facilities in 2 districts (Klang and Hulu Langat). I consider that method to be quite fitting for this study. The authors analyzed the transcribed data using thematic analysis, which is also a reliable and suitable method for analysis. The authors do not identify a specific perspective from which they developed the study. The authors mainly included journals in the study. Most of the journal articles were qualitative in nature while a few of them were quantitative in nature. The authors also included books and credible websites, which helped to improve the quality of research and information available on this topic. More than half of the articles that the authors cited in this study were more than five years old from the date of publication of this study. Nevertheless, the authors ensured to use only relevant sources for their study. Shima, Farizah, and Majid (2014) have not expressly indicated any weaknesses with the studies that they used in their research. The authors have provided an in-depth literature review, which explores many aspects of hypertension, which enables the reader to get a better understanding of this health condition. There was no framework or diagram developed from the findings of this study.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark AssignmentResults of StudyThis study reveals that there are sufficient facts indicating lack of community support and empowerment of patients the Malaysian society. It is also evident that most of the participants failed to adhere to the recommended lifestyle changes (such and changes in diet and engaging more in physical activity) and most of them also failed to take their antihypertensive medication after diagnosis. In addition, the findings reveal that the health care professionals and patients entered into some form of agreement before commencement of the treatment recommendation; however, there was no follow-up monitoring and counseling. Some of the reasons that most patients gave for failing to engage in physical activity, failing to take their antihypertensive medication, and not adhering to diet recommendations include inadequate information from healthcare professionals, patients’ attitudes, side effects of the hypertension medication, fear of those side effects, and inadequate social support from their immediate environments (Shima, Farizah, and Majid, 2014)Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment. These findings have profound implications to nursing because it means that health care professionals can then take corrective action to ensure better adherence to the care recommendation plans that they devise for their patients, thereby significantly helping to boost health outcomes. These findings contribute to nursing knowledge in the sense that they help to identify the thoughts and feelings of hypertensive patients and the possible measures that they can take to control the situation. The findings are quite significant because they have impact on all areas of nursing including administration, education, and practice.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment  Ethical ConsiderationsShima, Farizah, and Majid (2014) ensured to obtain ethical approval for their study, which they got from the University Malaya Medical Ethics Committee. The Malaysian Ministry of Health (National Medical Research Register number 12-625-12500) also approved the study. More importantly, the researchers ensured the confidentiality of the participants during the interviews and in any other engagements during the research. In this case, the interviewer ensured exclusivity of the answers by conducting the interviews only in the presence of the interviewee.  The interviewer conducted the in-depth interviews face-to-face and in a secluded location in the healthcare facility. This happened after the subjects had completed their sessions with caregivers and had taken their medication. Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark AssignmentConclusionThis study shows that health care professionals should take a more proactive role in supporting their hypertensive patients to adhere to the care recommendation plans provided for them. In their study, Shima, Farizah, and Majid (2014) show that health care professionals can use dialogue to facilitate management among hypertensive patients. In addition, health care professionals should give hypertensive patients sufficient time to accept the recommendations and to overcome their shyness of asking questions (Burns & Grove, 2011). Essentially, a self-management approach should be helpful in facilitating better healthcare for individuals, communities, and ethnicities.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment   ReferencesBurns, N., & Grove, S. (2011).Understanding nursing research (5thed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.Shima, R., Farizah, M. H., & Majid, H. A. (2014). A qualitative study on hypertensive care behavior in primary health care settings in Malaysia. Patient Preference and Adherence, 8, 1597–1609. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S69680Research Critique GuidelinesTo write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of the research study conducted, address each component below for qualitative study in the Topic 2 assignment and the quantitative study in the Topic 3 assignment.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark AssignmentSuccessful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, or reference content from the study in your responses.Qualitative StudyBackground of Study:· Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.· How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.· Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.· List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.· Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem?Method of Study:· Were qualitative methods appropriate to answer the research questions?· Did the author identify a specific perspective from which the study was developed? If so, what was it?· Did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? What other types of literature did the author include?· Are the references current? For qualitative studies, the author may have included studies older than the 5-year limit typically used for quantitative studies. Findings of older qualitative studies may be relevant to a qualitative study.· Did the author evaluate or indicate the weaknesses of the available studies?Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment· Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument?· When a researcher uses the grounded theory method of qualitative inquiry, the researcher may develop a framework or diagram as part of the findings of the study. Was a framework developed from the study findings?Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark AssignmentResults of Study· What were the study findings?· What are the implications to nursing?· Explain how the findings contribute to nursing knowledge/science. Would this impact practice, education, administration, or all areas of nursing?Ethical Considerations· Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?· Was patient privacy protected?· Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of?Conclusion· Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.· Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.· Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.· Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned.   Quantitative StudyBackground of Study:· Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.· How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.· Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.· List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment· Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem?Methods of Study· Identify the benefits and risks of participation addressed by the authors. Were there benefits or risks the authors do not identify?· Was informed consent obtained from the subjects or participants?· Did it seem that the subjects participated voluntarily in the study?· Was institutional review board approval obtained from the agency in which the study was conducted?· Are the major variables (independent and dependent variables) identified and defined? What were these variables?· How were data collected in this study?· What rationale did the author provide for using this data collection method?· Identify the time period for data collection of the study.Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment· Describe the sequence of data collection events for a participant.· Describe the data management and analysis methods used in the study.· Did the author discuss how the rigor of the process was assured? For example, does the author describe maintaining a paper trail of critical decisions that were made during the analysis of the data? Was statistical software used to ensure accuracy of the analysis?· What measures were used to minimize the effects of researcher bias (their experiences and perspectives)? For example, did two researchers independently analyze the data and compare their analyses?Results of Study· What is the researcher’s interpretation of findings?· Are the findings valid or an accurate reflection of reality? Do you have confidence in the findings?· What limitations of the study were identified by researchers?Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment· Was there a coherent logic to the presentation of findings?Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment· What implications do the findings have for nursing practice? For example, can the findings of the study be applied to general nursing practice, to a specific population, or to a specific area of nursing?· What suggestions are made for further studies?Ethical Considerations· Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?· Was patient privacy protected?· Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of?Conclusion· Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.· Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.· Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.· Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned. ReferenceBurns, N., & Grove, S. (2011). Understanding nursing research (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier. Research Critique and Picot Statement Final Draft- Benchmark Assignment

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: