Expert Homework Help Online & Write My Essay Service

Hire best homework helpers for online homework help 24/7. Are you looking for online homework help? Try our excellent homework help who can help you get A+ grade in your assignment.

Order my paper
Calculate your essay price
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

19 k happy customers
9.5 out of 10 satisfaction rate
527 writers active

Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet Assignment

Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentReading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentRead over each of the following directions, the required Reading Research Literature worksheet, and grading rubric.Review the following video which contains a tutorial for your Week 6 Assignment. Tutorial may look slightly different session to session. Grading criteria and rubric will be the same. Access the transcript via this link: Week 6 Assignment Transcript (Links to an external site.).Week 6 Assignment Tutorial: and complete the required Reading Research Literature (RRL) worksheet (Links to an external site.). This must be used. Your required article is available to you in an announcement: IMPORTANT: Assigned Article for Week 6 Assignment. Please go to your announcement to locate the required article assigned for this session.This assignment contains:ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HEREPurpose of the Study:  Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize the purpose of the study.  Describe what the study is about.Research & Design:  Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize the description of the type of research and the design of the study.  Include how it supports the purpose (aim or intent) of the study.Sample:  Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize the population (sample) for the study; include key characteristics, sample size, sampling technique.Data Collection:  Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one data that was collected and how the data was collected from the study.Data Analysis:  Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the data analysis/ tests performed or one method of data analysis from the study; include what you know/learned about the descriptive or statistical test or data analysis method.Limitations:  Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one limitation reported in the study.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentFindings/Discussion:  Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the authors’ findings/discussion reported in the study. Include one interesting detail you learned from reading the study.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentReading Research Literature:  Summarize why it is important for you to read and understand research literature.  Summarize what you learned from completing the reading research literature activity worksheet.You are required to complete the worksheet using the productivity tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.docx” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at (Links to an external site.). Click on the envelope at the top of the page.Submit the completed Reading Research Literature Worksheet to the Week 6 Assignment.Week 6: Reading Research Literature WorksheetDirections: Complete the following required worksheet using the required article for the current session. Name:Date: Purpose of the Study:  Research & Design:  Sample:  Data Collection:  Data Analysis:Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet Assignment   Limitations:  Findings/Discussion:  Reading Research Literature:Nursing Economic$Patients spend more time with nurses than any other healthcare professional. The primary conduit of information between the patient and healthcare team are nurses; therefore, nurses need to be good communicators. Careful listening is at the core of good communication and is a key element of patient safety and experience (Balik & Dopkiss, 2010). A key component of nurse-patient communication is the patient’s perception of their experience with the nurse listening. Despite the known importance and impact on patient experience, quality outcomes, and reimbursement, there is a gap in research on effective nurse communication from the patient’s perspective.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentHealthcare’s shift from volume to value requires hospitals to focus on performance and quality outcomes, such as patient experience, as measured by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. The nursing communication domainwithin the survey has the greatest impact on the patient’s overall experience score (Studer Group, 2012). The first series of HCAHPS survey questions focus on patient care received from nurses (Centers Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS], 2020). It asks about being treated with courtesy and respect, nurse listening, and the nurse’s ability to explain things in a way the patient can understand.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentPatient experience, a key hospital performance metric, is a component of value-based purchasing (VBP), which holds providers accountable by linking Medicare reimbursement to outcomes. For FY17, the VBP program affected 2% of the base operating payments to hospitals. This resulted in $1.7 billion in Medicare payments being withheld from hospitals because of poor performance on the HCAHPS survey measuring patient experience (Becker’s Hospital Review, 2017). Research by Press Ganey® revealed hospitals focusing on improving the nurse communication metric could potentially influence 15% ofNurses’ Active Empathetic Listening Behaviors from the Voice of the Patient Karen K. Myers Rebecca KrepperAinslie Nibert Robin TomsEffective nurse communication, including listening skills, is essential to a positive nurse- patient relationship. This two- group comparative study identified how adult hospitalized patients perceived effective and ineffective nurse active empathetic listening (AEL) behaviors. Participants identified the AEL behavior most important to them, providing guidance to prioritize interventions to enhance the perception of being listened to.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentSeptember/October 2020 | Volume 38 Number 5268their VBP incentive payment (Rodak, 2013). The financial consequences of poor patient experience influenced by nurse communication further support the need to address the gap in nursing science.Press Ganey (2013) conducted a hierarchical variable clustering analysis on all eight HCAHPS dimensions. The variable clustering analysis identifies multiple measures that “hang together” consistently, while the hierarchical analysis identifies the measure that leads the others in the cluster. Five of the eight dimensions clustered with nurse communication, which is also the dominant dimension. Based on this analysis, it is probable the other four dimensions in the cluster (responsiveness of hospital staff, pain management, communi – cation about medication, and overall rating) would experience an improvement in performance if hospitals focused on improving the nurse communication dimension. Identified as the “rising tide” measure, the findings of this study support hospital prioritization of strategies focused on improving nursing communication, with potential positive impacts beyond VBP (Press Ganey, 2013).Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentThree qualitative studies involving the patient/client viewpoint of being listened to were performed in Canadian outpatient settings (Jonas- Simpson et al., 2006; Myers, 2000) and one in the United States (Clementi, 2006). The consistent finding from these studies was that the feeling ofbeing listened to is gratifying. The common listening observed trait was facial expression of the caregiver during caregiver- patient dialogue. Students enrolled in communication studies who participated in a quantitative study (Bodie et al., 2012) identified characteristics/behaviors perceived as demonstrating listening competence. Actions such as head nods, focused body language/position, eye contact, extended responding, and subject-appropriate responding indicated competent listeners (Bodie et al., 2012). The common themes across these four studies can be categorized into verbal and nonverbal responses. The use of questions and subject/content responses were verbal behaviors. The nonverbal responses included body language described as head nod, body position, eye contact, smiling, and facial expressions/emotions.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentLimited research has been conducted in nursing science on the topic of listening, with the majority of prior research focused on listening from the nurse’s perspective. Drollinger and coauthors (2006) incorporated the terminology of active empathetic listening (AEL) as a form of listening. The active listening process is combined with empathy to attain a higher form of listening. The researchers confirmed AEL supported salespeople in a deeper understanding of their customers while separating their personal feelings from the messages (Drollinger et al.,2006). The purpose of this study was to distinguish between effective and ineffective nurse AEL behaviors as perceived by adult inpatients from an acute care hospital.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentMethodsA nonexperimental quantitative two-group comparison descriptive study was used to assess patients’ perceptions of nurse listening. The study sought to explore the following research questions: 1. Do patients admitted to anacute care hospital perceive a difference between nurses who exhibit AEL behaviors and those who do not?2. Is there a difference in the demographics of patients who perceive that nurses employ AEL behaviors versus nurses who do not?3. Which of the characteristics of AEL behaviors are perceived by patients as most important? The study setting was alarge metropolitan hospital in the south-central region of the United States. Approval for the study was obtained from the hospital’s Institutional Review Board (IRB), Institutional Privacy Office, and the university IRB. The study invitation and survey tools were distributed to qualifying patients to their email or home addresses provided at the time of hospital admission. The informed consent was incorporated into the introductory section of the electronic survey or enclosed with the paper copy if sent to a home address.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentNursing Economic$September/October 2020 | Volume 38 Number 5 269Study Participants Study participants wereadults who experienced inpatient acute care hospitalization and were discharged from one of the pre- selected medical and surgical patient care units. Inclusion criteria were patients who were at least 18 years of age; English- speaking, reading, and writing (query at admission: “What is your preferred language” with response of English); and discharged to home from the hospital from the units included in the study. Exclusion criteria included patients unable to provide a physical or virtual address that could be used by the researcher to mail or email study instruments.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentInstruments Two instruments were usedin the study: a demographic data form and the AEL scale. The demographic data collected from participants included age, ethnicity, gender, hospital length of stay (LOS), type of hospitalization (surgical or medical), English as first language, and recent hospital readmission(s). These variables were selected to determine if participants were a representative sample of the inpatient medical-surgical population being studied.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentThe AEL scale was initially designed to measure active empathetic listening of salespeople (Drollinger et al., 2006) and permission was obtained to use it in this study. Drollinger and colleagues (2006) used exploratory factor analysisto refine the scale from 21 items to 11. The 11-item tool is grouped in the three subscales of listening, representing sensing (items 1-4), processing (items 5- 7), and responding (items 8-11). Each item is scored using a 7- point Likert scale: score of 1 is defined as never or almost never true to score of 7 always or almost always true and 4 occasionally true. Participants scored each of the 11 items individually based on the perception of the nurse’s listening behaviors. Sensing is the receipt of both verbal and nonverbal communication/cues from the speaker (Comer & Drollinger, 1999). The receiver’s cognitive processing of the information through understanding, interpreting, evaluation, and remembering is the processing phase of listening (Comer & Drollinger, 1999). Responding acknowledges information has been received through verbal and nonverbal responses to assure speaker listening has occurred (Comer & Drollinger, 1999).Reported internal consistency levels range from 0.74 to 0.94 for the three subscales (Bodie, 2011; Drollinger et al., 2006; Fenniman, 2010). Construct validity levels range from 0.81 to 0.85 (Drollinger et al., 2006). The internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha at 0.86 and 0.94 for the total scale for Bodie’s two studies is consistent with the resulting alpha of 0.93 for the pilot study conducted by the primary investigator (PI). The studies’ subscales ranged from 0.66-0.89 (Bodie, 2011;Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentDrollinger et al., 2006; Fenniman, 2010) and were also consistent with the pilot study results of alpha 0.84-0.87. The reliability of the AEL instrument applied across salespersons, supervisors, and communication students further supports Bodie’s hypothesis that the tool can be used to study a variety of interpersonal relationships. The levels of internal consistency at the subscale and total scale support the conceptual model that sensing, processing, and responding work together to produce a higher-order listening construct (Ramsey & Sohi, 1997).Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentBased on the literature, the AEL scale has been used to evaluate listening behaviors of salespersons (Drollinger et al., 2006), supervisors (Fenniman, 2010), and communication students (Bodie, 2011). The AEL scale was adapted for this study to determine patients’ perceptions of nurse listening. Two questions were added. The first question, “Did your nurses listen to you throughout your hospitalization?” served as a filter to create two groups for comparison. Patients were asked to respond on an 8-point Likert scale with 1 being not at all and 8 being the most possible. The final question on the survey asked patients to identify the one item from the AEL 11-item tool that was most important to them.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentData Collection After IRB approvals wereobtained, the PI contacted the hospital’s Health System Information Systems DepartmentNursing Economic$September/October 2020 | Volume 38 Number 5270to initiate daily reports for patients meeting inclusion criteria. The reports were sent to a password-protected computer accessible only by the PI. The list of patients meeting criteria included the patient’s address provided at the time of hospital registration. If both an email address and home mailing address were provided, the PI used the email address to distribute the survey via the PsychData® web-based encrypted survey software. Data were collected over 8-months in 2019. The researcher sent over 3,000 email surveys and an additional 2,000 were sent via U.S. postal service. A total of 305 surveys were returned (4.7% electronically and 8.6% via the mail). A cover letter/message was sent with the surveys explaining the purpose of the survey and inviting patients to participate in the voluntary research study. The participants who provided only a mailing address were also sent a pre- addressed and stamped return envelope addressed to the PI. The study invitation and survey were distributed within a minimum of 15 days after discharge. This time lag was required to comply with the CAHPS® Hospital Survey (HCAHPS) CMS (2018) Quality Assurance Guidelines intended to limit survey burden and prevent potential bias to the HCAHPS survey results.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentUpon receipt of the completed surveys, all data were loaded into a database. Individuals who responded to the first question (“Did your nurses listen to you throughoutyour hospitalization?”) with a 7 or 8 rating were placed in Group A (patients who perceive nurses exhibit AEL behaviors). Those who responded with a score of 6 or less were placed in Group B (patients who perceive nurses did not exhibit AEL behaviors).Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentData Analysis Data were analyzed usingthe IBM® SPSS® Statistics V25 and a significance level of p<0.05. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all demographic and outcome variables (means and standard deviations for continuous variables; frequencies and percentages for categorical variables). An independent t-test (two-tailed) for unequal variances was used for all but two of the AEL scale questions to determine if there was a significant difference between the two groups (those who perceived nurses had positive empathetic listening behaviors vs. those who did not). To assess if there was a significant difference in the demographic variables of patients in the two groups, cross-tabulation using chi-square test (Pearson chi- square and Cramer’s V) was applied to the categorical data (gender, ethnicity, whether they were a medical or surgical patient, whether English was first language, and if they have had any recent hospital readmissions). An independent t- test (two-tailed) was used for the age demographic. The Mann- Whitney U test was applied for LOS in the hospital due to the skewed distribution. Rank orderof response item frequency was calculated to answer the third research question on which of the characteristics of active empathetic listening behaviors were perceived by the patients as most important. Also, the internal consistency of the AEL scale was evaluated by calculating the Cronbach’s alpha for the subscales (assessing, processing, and evaluating) and total score.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentResultsDemographics A priori power analysisusing G*Power 3.1.9 was conducted using an alpha of 0.05, effect size of 0.5(d), and power of 0.8, resulting in an estimated sample size of 102 participants for an indepeReading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet Assignment ndent t-test (one-tailed) and 128 participants for a two-tailed t- test. Some of the 305 surveys returned were not completed, so the final sample consisted of 244 participants. Using the responses to the first question of the survey, 194 (79.5%) participants were placed in Group A (positive perception) and 50 (20.5%) in Group B (negative perception). The average age of the total sample was 59.77 (range 18-95). Males (50.8%) and females (49.2%) were evenly distributed. The majority were White (62%), surgical patients (62.4%), with an average LOS of 4.77 days (range 1-74). Forty participants (16.7%) experienced readmission after the hospitalization in which they met inclusion criteria for theNursing Economic$September/October 2020 | Volume 38 Number 5 271study. No statistically significant differences were found in the demographic characteristics of the two groups (alpha 0.05; see Table 1).Survey Results The t-test (two-tailed)revealed there was a significant difference in the AEL scale total score for Group A (M=6.12, SD=0.88) and Group B (M=3.89, SD=1.45); (t=10.36, p<0.001).Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentEach of the AEL subscales of sensing, processing, and responding also had statistically significant differences between the two groups (Group A’s mean scores were 6.01, 5.98, 6.32, and Group B’s were 3.94, 3.56, 4.08). The subscale with the highest mean was responding (Group A; µ=6.32) and the lowest subscale mean was processing (Group B; µ=3.56) (see Table 2). In addition, statistically significantdifferences were found between Group A and B for each of the 11-items composing the AEL scale (see Table 3). Results were confirmed with nonparametric Mann-Whitney U tests because the groups were of unequal size.The last question on the survey asked participants to identify which characteristic from the 11-item AEL scale was most important to them as a patient. The characteristic identified theNursing Economic$Table 1. Demographics Characteristic by Group and OverallCharacteristicsTotal** N=244 n (%)Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentGroup A N=194Positive Perception NurseListening n (%)Group B N=50Negative Perception NurseListening n (%) p*Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet Assignment(two-tailed) Cramer’s VGenderMale 123 (50.8) 97 (50.3) 26 (53.1) 0.726 0.023Female 119 (49.2) 96 (49.7) 23 (46.9) EthnicityWhite 150 (62) 122 (62.9) 28 (58.3)0.435 0.106 Hispanic 40 (16.5) 31 (16.0) 9 (18.8) Black 38 (15.7) 28 (14.4) 10 (20.8) Other 14 (5.8) 13 (6.7) 1 (2.1)SurgeryYes 151 (62.4) 125 (65.1) 26 (52.0) 0.088 0.110No 91 (37.6) 67 (34.9) 24 (48.0) English as First LanguageYes 225 (92.6) 177 (91.7) 48 (96.0) 0.302 0.066No 18 (7.4) 16 (8.3) 2 (4.0) Readmission after HospitalizationYes 40 (16.7) 34 (17.8) 6 (12.5) 0.379 0.057No 199 (83.3) 157 (82.2) 42 (87.5) Age µ (SD) 59.77 (16.93) 60.68 (17.07) 55.98 (15.93) 0.091 Length of Stay (days)µ (SD) 4.77 (6.28) 4.34 (3.95) 6.47 (11.42) 0.873*c2 used for dichotomous and categorical data; t-test used for age; Mann-Whitney U test used for length of stay due to lack of normal distribution **Not all participants answered every demographic survey itemSeptember/October 2020 | Volume 38 Number 5272Nursing Economic$Table 2. Group Comparison: Subscales and Total Score for Active Empathic Listening ScaleSubscales and Total Tool Group n M SD t*p (two-tailed)Sensing Positive (A) 194 6.0064 1.022989.180 <0.001 Negative (B) 50 3.9433 1.50193Processing Positive 193 5.9810 1.1757810.557 <0.001 Negative 50 3.5633 1.50468Responding Positive 194 6.3174 0.853769.547 <0.001 Negative 50 4.0783 1.60086Total Tool Positive 194 6.1170 0.8822310.360 <0.001 Negative 50 3.8941 1.44960* Independent t-testTable 3. Group Comparison: Perceived Difference Between Nurses Who Exhibit Active Empathic ListeningBehaviors and Those Who Do NotCharacteristic/Behavior ListeningPerception n M SD t* p(two-tailed)Sensitive to what I was not saying Positive 190 6.06 1.248.405 <0.001 Negative 48 3.71 1.83Aware of what I implied but did not say Positive 190 5.66 1.497.254 <0.001 Negative 45 3.56 1.80Understood how I felt Positive 190 6.31 0.938.417 <0.001 Negative 48 4.27 1.61Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentListened for more than spoken words Positive 192 6.05 1.159.203 <0.001 Negative 47 3.91 1.49Assured me they would remember what I said Positive 191 5.86 1.538.699 <0.001 Negative 50 3.68 1.73Summarized points of agreement and disagreement when appropriatePositive 188 5.99 1.40 10.231 <0.001Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentNegative 47 3.62 1.51Kept track of points I made Positive 190 6.08 1.1410.922 <0.001 Negative 47 3.40 1.58Assured me they were listening by verbal acknowledgmentsPositive 194 6.43 0.89 10.255 <0.001Negative 49 3.98 1.61Assured me they were receptive to my ideas Positive 188 6.16 1.067.934 <0.001 Negative 49 3.92 1.90Asked questions that showed they understood my positionsPositive 192 6.34 0.95 9.181 <0.001Negative 48 3.98 1.72 Showed me they were listening with their body language (e.g., head nods)Positive 192 6.31 0.98 7.429 <0.001Negative 50 4.30 1.84* Independent t-test Note: AEL Scale adapted from Drollinger et al., 2006.September/October 2020 | Volume 38 Number 5 273most (21.6%) was “The nurses understood how I felt,” belonging to the sensing subscale. The second, third, and fourth highest made up 41.4% of the responses and were all characteristics of the responding subscale (see Table 4).The AEL scale overall internal consistency using Cronbach’s alpha reliability was 0.965. All the item-item correlations were positive and ranged from 0.564 to 1.000. The Cronbach alpha coefficients for the AEL subscales were 0.915 for sensing, 0.901 for processing, and 0.949 for responding. The subscale item-item correlations were all positive. Reliability for the AEL scale total score and subscales was strong with all Cronbach alpha coefficients exceeding 0.90.DiscussionWith patient experience driving financial, quality, andsafety performance, nurses at the core of patient interactions need to understand better the impact their communication has on meeting patients’ needs. No significant differences were noted in the demographics between those participants who perceived their nurses listened to them throughout their hospitalization (score of 7 or 8 on the first survey question) and those who did not (score of 6 or below). This finding suggests that age, gender, ethnicity, surgical or medical, LOS, or readmission do not impact how patients perceive listening. This is important given the diversity of patients and the fundamental need to be listened to. In a study conducted by The Beryl Institute (Wolf, 2018), 91% of the respondents believed patient experience was either extremely important or very important to them. Being listened to was consistently ranked as the top factor influencing patientexperience across all age groups and internationally (Wolf, 2018).Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentTo establish excellence in the focused area of patient interactions, a foundation of communication skills to meet these needs is essential. Effective listening is the most essential part of good communication (Drollinger et al., 2006). The AEL survey instrument captures the main characteristics of listening. This was confirmed by the results of this study. There was a significant difference in the two groups not only in the total AEL score but for each of the subscales and each of the individual behaviors. These results begin to fill the gap on what is important from the patient’s perspective in achieving effective communication.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentWith listening behaviors from the patient’s perspective poorly understood, this study is the first to identify effective AELNursing Economic$Table 4. Active Empathic Listening Scale Behavior Most Important to PatientsCharacteristic: The nurses… Frequency Valid % Subscale…understood how I felt. 45 21.6 Sensing …asked questions that showed they understood my positions. 39 18.8 Responding …assured me they were listening by using verbal acknowledgments. 27 13.0 Responding …showed me they were listening by their body language (e.g., head nods). 20 9.6 Responding …were sensitive to what I was not saying. 19 9.1 Sensing …listened for more than just my spoken words. 15 7.2 Sensing …kept track of points I made. 11 5.3 Processing …assured me they would remember what I said. 10 4.8 Processing …summarized points of agreement and disagreement when appropriate. 10 4.8 Processing …were aware of what I implied but did not say. 6 2.9 Sensing …assured me they were receptive to my ideas. 6 2.9 RespondingNote: AEL Scale adapted from Drollinger et al., 2006.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentSeptember/October 2020 | Volume 38 Number 5274behaviors through the patient’s lens. The last question on the survey asked participants to identify the nurse listening behavior they perceived as most important. The rank order of importance to the patient may guide the priority of intervention to enhance the perception of being listened to. Prior research (Bodie et al., 2012; Clementi, 2006; Jonas-Simpson et al., 2006; Myers, 2000) identified common verbal and nonverbal characteristics of effective listening. The verbal characteristics of using questions and content-appropriate responses may be comparable to the AEL scale items “The nurses asked questions that showed they understood my positions” and “The nurses assured me that they were listening by using verbal acknowledgments.” These AEL behaviors ranked second and third as most important to patients.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentThe AEL scale included a similar nonverbal behavior “The nurses showed me they were listening by their body language (e.g., head nods).” In this study, this behavior ranked fourth most important. “The nurses understood how I felt” was the AEL behavior ranked as most important to the participants based on rank order response frequency. This behavior is similar to the findings in Myers’ study (2000) with participants who associated being empathetically understood and heard. These assumed commonalities align earlier results with this study to further support them as prioritybehaviors to be addressed in nursing practice.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentThe AEL scale has been used to evaluate listening behaviors of salespersons, supervisors, and communication students with established reliability. The Cronbach alphas calculated for the total score, as well as each of the subscales, exhibited strong reliability. The reliability of the AEL scale suggests it can be effectively applied across a variety of interpersonal relationships.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentThe focus on patient experience has gained momentum as a priority in health care over the last decade (Wolf, 2018). In a recent survey by the Beryl Institute (Wolf, 2019), patient experience was identified as one of the top three organizational priorities in the next 3 years. According to Press Ganey (2018), “Patient experience is five times more likely to influence brand loyalty than other marketing strategies” (p. 1). The cost of poor performance is negatively impacting hospitals’ financial bottom lines through pay for performance and consumer loyalty. To address this hospital economic impact, it is imperative to enhance nurse- patient communication and, more specifically listening, from the patient’s perspective. The growing body of evidence demonstrating the influence nurse communication has on patient experience outcomes further substantiates the need for research to narrow the gap in nursing science.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentLimitationsThe primary limitation of this study was the use of a convenience sample, limiting the generalizability of the findings. The sample was limited to patients whose discharge destination was home. Another limitation was the low response rate from both the email and paper surveys that included a small sample size for the negative perception group. After patients are discharged from a hospital, they can receive multiple surveys from the hospital and other sources, resulting in the potential for survey fatigue. The volume of email communications with the ever-increasing use of electronic methods to communicate could have also resulted in the survey being overlooked. The sample size required for statistical analysis was achieved only through a commitment to distribute numerous surveys with the response rate so low. Personal contact with the patient before discharge from the hospital to inform them of the study and to expect the survey may have resulted in a higher response rate.Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentThe Likert scale used for the response to the filter question “Did your nurses listen to you throughout your hospitalization” ranged from 1 not at all to 8 the most possible might have been interpreted differently by participants. With the complex hospital environment where multi-tasking is common, the patient’s observation of busy nurses could have been interpreted as doing “as muchNursing Economic$September/October 2020 | Volume 38 Number 5 275as possible” given the circumstances resulting in a more favorable score.Implications for PracticeWith the growing evidence of the importance and impact on patient experience focused on nurse-patient interactions, each of the 11 listening behaviors included in the AEL scale is a behavior that should be an essential component of nursing education and incorporated into nursing practice. AEL behaviors can be taught and validated in skills labs, simulation, or clinical settings and may favorably influence the patient experience. The rank order of importance to the patient may be a starting point to focus on educational resources.ConclusionEssential to a positive nurse- patient relationship is good nurse communication, including listening skills. With the absence of empirical evidence, the accepted practice of nurse listening is based on assumptions and not the patient’s reality. The findings from this study begin the journey in addressing the nursing science gap to understand the complex skill of listening from the patient’s perspective. This study suggests effective active empathetic nurse listening skills will influence a positive patient experience. The correlation between the AEL total score and HCAHPS responses associated with nursecommunication (listening) should be explored further. Further research needs to be conducted in other hospital settings and locations across the country to fill the gap in knowledge on this critical element of nurse-patient communication impacting quality, safety, and patient experience. $Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentKaren K. Myers, PhD, RN, NEA-BC PhD Graduate Texas Woman’s University, College of Nursing Houston, TX Rebecca Krepper, PhD, MBA, RN Professor Texas Woman’s University, College of Nursing Houston, TX Ainslie Nibert, PhD, RN, FAAN Associate Dean Associate Professor Texas Woman’s University, College of Nursing Houston, TX Robin Toms, PhD, MN, RN, NEA-BC Professor Texas Woman’s University, College of Nursing Houston, TX Acknowledgment: The authors thank the Memorial Hermann Health System-TMC for their support.References Balik, B., & Dopkiss, F. (2010). 10 years afterto err is human: Are we listening to patients and families yet? Focus on Patient Safety, 13(1), 1-8.Becker’s Hospital Review (2017). CFOs: The new ‘executive champions’ of patient satisfaction. https://www.beckers new-executive-champions-of-patient- satisfaction.htmlBodie, G.D. (2011). The active-empathic listening scale (AELS): Conceptuali – zation and evidence of validity within the interpersonal domain. Communication Quarterly, 59(3), 277-295. https://doi. org/10.1080/01463373.2011.583495Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentBodie, G.D., St. Cyr, K., Pence, M., Rold, M., & Honeycutt, J. (2012). Listening competence in initial interactions I: Distinguishing between what listening isand what listeners do. International Journal of Listening, 26(1), 1-28. 639645Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). (2020). HCAHPS hospital survey. https://www.hcahpsonline.orgCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). (2018). CAHPS® Hospital Survey (HCAHPS): Quality assurance guidelines. Version 13.0. http://www. quality-assurance/2018_qag_v13.0.pdfClementi, P.S. (2006). Patient expectations during health care encounters theory: A grounded theory study (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Comer, L.B., & Drollinger, T. (1999). Active empathetic listening and selling success: A conceptual framework. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 19(1), 15-29.Drollinger, T., Comer, L.B., & Warrington, P.T. (2006). Development and validation of the active empathetic listening scale. Psychology & Marketing, 23(2), 161- 180., A. (2010). Understanding each other at work: An examination of the effects of perceived empathetic listening on psychological safety in the supervisor-subordinate relationship (Doctoral dissertation). George Washington University.Jonas-Simpson, C., Mitchell, G.J., Fisher, A., Jones, G., & Linscott, J. (2006). The experience of being listened to: A qualitative study of older adults in long- term care settings. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 32(1), 46-53. 20060101-15Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentMyers, S. (2000). Empathetic listening: Reports on the experience of being heard. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 40(2), 148-173. https://doi. org/10.1177/0022167800402004Press Ganey®. (2013). The rising tide measure: Communication with nurses [White paper]. AssociatesInc/Communication_With_ Nurses_May2013.pdfPress Ganey®. (2018). Consumerism: The role of patient experience in brand management and patient acquisition [White paper]. https://www.pressganey. com/resources/white-papers/ consumerism-the-role-of-patient- experience-in-brand-managementcontinued on page 266Nursing Economic$September/October 2020 | Volume 38 Number 5266Voice of the Patient continued from page 275 Ramsey, R.P., & Sohi, R.S. (1997). Listening to your customers: The impact of perceivedsalesperson listening behavior on relationship outcomes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 127-137., S. (2013). Investing in nurse communication pays dividends in HCAHPS scores. Becker’s Clinical Leadership & Infection Control. infection-control/investing-in-nurse-communication-pays-dividends-in-hcahps-scores.htmlStuder Group. (2012). A focus on nurse communication: The most powerful composite of all. 2012/a-focus-on-nurse-communication-the-most-powerful-cWolf, J.A. (2018). Consumer perspectives on patient experience 2018 [White paper]. Beryl Institute., J.A. (2019). 2019 The state of patient experience: A call to action for the future of human experience [White paper]. Beryl Institute. MARKINGReproduced with permission of copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet AssignmentReading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet Assignment

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more