Expert Homework Help Online & Write My Essay Service

Hire best homework helpers for online homework help 24/7. Are you looking for online homework help? Try our excellent homework help who can help you get A+ grade in your assignment.

Order my paper
Calculate your essay price
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

19 k happy customers
9.5 out of 10 satisfaction rate
527 writers active

Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care ActPolitics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care ActRegardless of political affiliation, individuals often grow concerned when considering perceived competing interests of government and their impact on topics of interest to them. The realm of healthcare is no different. Some people feel that local, state, and federal policies and legislation can be either helped or hindered by interests other than the benefit to society.Consider for example that the number one job of a legislator is to be reelected. Cost can be measured in votes as well as dollars. Thus, it is important to consider the legislator’s perspective on either promoting or not promoting a certain initiative in the political landscape.To Prepare:Review the Resources and reflect on efforts to repeal/replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).Consider who benefits the most when policy is developed and in the context of policy implementation.ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HEREBy Day 3 of Week 3Post an explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the voters views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re-elected. Please check your discussion grading rubric to ensure your responses meet the criteria.Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care ActMain Posting–45 (45%) – 50 (50%)Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.Supported by at least three current, credible sources.Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.40 (40%) – 44 (44%)Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.Supported by at least three credible sources.Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Responds to some of the discussion question(s).One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Post is cited with two credible sources.Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.Contains some APA formatting errors.Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act0 (0%) – 34 (34%)Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Contains only one or no credible sources.Not written clearly or concisely.Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.Feedback:Main Post: Timeliness–10 (10%) – 10 (10%)Posts main post by day 3.0 (0%) – 0 (0%)0 (0%) – 0 (0%)0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not post by day 3.Feedback:Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care ActFirst Response–17 (17%) – 18 (18%)Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.15 (15%) – 16 (16%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.13 (13%) – 14 (14%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.0 (0%) – 12 (12%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.Feedback:Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care ActSecond Response–16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.12 (12%) – 13 (13%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.0 (0%) – 11 (11%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.Feedback:Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care ActParticipation–5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.0 (0%) – 0 (0%)0 (0%) – 0 (0%)0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.Feedback:Total Points: 100Legislation Grid TemplateUse this document to complete Part 1 of the Module 2 Assessment Legislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy StatementHealth-related Bill Name Bill Number DescriptionFederal or State? Legislative IntentProponents/ OpponentsProponents:Opponents:Target Population Status of the bill (Is it in hearings or committees?)General Notes/CommentsAs a nurse, how often have you thought to yourself, If I had anything to do about it, things would work a little differently? Increasingly, nurses are beginning to realize that they do, in fact, have a role and a voice.Many nurses encounter daily experiences that motivate them to take on an advocacy role in hopes of impacting policies, laws, or regulations that impact healthcare issues of interest. Of course, doing so means entering the less familiar world of policy and politics. While many nurses do not initially feel prepared to operate in this space effectively, the reward is the opportunity to shape and influence future health policy.To Prepare:Select a bill that has been proposed (not one that has been enacted) using the congressional websites provided in the Learning Resources.The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Legislation Grid; 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement)Be sure to add a title page, an introduction, purpose statement, and a conclusion. This is an APA paper.Part 1: Legislation GridBased on the health-related bill (proposed, not enacted) you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care ActDetermine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy StatementBased on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following:Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.At least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources are used. Federal and State LegislationPart 1: Legislation GridBased on the health-related bill you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:• Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.• Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.• Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.• Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?–Excellent32 (32%) – 35 (35%)The response clearly and accurately summarizes in detail the legislative intent of the health-related bill.The response accurately identifies in detail the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill.The response accurately identifies in detail the populations targeted by the health-related bill.The response clearly and thoroughly describes in detail the current status of the health-related bill.Good28 (28%) – 31 (31%)The response accurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill.The response accurately identifies the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill.The response accurately identifies the populations targeted by the health-related bill.The response accurately describes the current status of the health-related bill.Fair25 (25%) – 27 (27%)Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care ActThe response vaguely or inaccurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill.The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill.The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the populations targeted by the health-related bill.The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the current status of the health-related bill.Poor0 (0%) – 24 (24%)Summary of the legislative intent of the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.Identification of the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill are vague and inaccurate or is missing.Identification of the populations targeted by the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.The description of the current status of the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.Advocating for LegislationPart 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy StatementBased on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following:Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act• Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.• Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.–Excellent45 (45%) – 50 (50%)Testimony clearly and thoroughly provides statements that fully justifies a position for a health-related bill.Response provides a detailed, thorough, and logical explanation of how to address opponents to the position for the health-related bill and includes one or more clear and accurate supporting examples.A complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources is provided. The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the responses provided.Good40 (40%) – 44 (44%)Testimony clearly and accurately provides statements that somewhat justifies a position for a health-related bill.Response provides an accurate explanation of how to address opponents to the position for the health-related bill and may include at least one supporting example.An accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource is provided. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that may support the responses provided.Fair35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Testimony used to justify a position for a health-related bill is vague or inaccurate.Explanation of how to address the opponents to the position for the health-related bill is vague or inaccurate, lacks logic, and/or the supporting examples are vague or inaccurate.A vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources is provided. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided.Poor0 (0%) – 34 (34%)Testimony used to justify a position for a health-related bill is vague and inaccurate, incomplete, or is missing.Explanation of how to address the opponents to the position for the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources is provided, or is missing. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses provided.Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.–Excellent5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care ActParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.Good4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.Fair3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.Poor0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–Excellent5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.Good4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Fair3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Poor0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–Excellent5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.Good4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care ActFair3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.Poor0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.Total Points: 100Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: