Expert Homework Help Online & Write My Essay Service

Hire best homework helpers for online homework help 24/7. Are you looking for online homework help? Try our excellent homework help who can help you get A+ grade in your assignment.

Order my paper
Calculate your essay price
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

19 k happy customers
9.5 out of 10 satisfaction rate
527 writers active

NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Assignments

NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Assignments NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsWeek 1 Discussion: Presidential AgendasRegardless of political affiliation, every citizen has a stake in healthcare policy decisions. Hence, it is little wonder why healthcare items become such high-profile components of presidential agendas. It is also little wonder why they become such hotly debated agenda items.Consider a topic that rises to the presidential level. How did each of the presidents (Trump, Obama, and Bush) handle the problem? What would you do differently?To Prepare:Review the Resources and reflect on the importance of agenda setting.Consider how federal agendas promote healthcare issues and how these healthcare issues become agenda priorities.By Day 3 of Week 1Post your response to the discussion question: Consider a topic that rises to the presidential level. How did each of the presidents (Trump, Obama, and Bush) handle the problem? What would you do differently?NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsBy Day 6 of Week 1Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by expanding on their response and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example.*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE Rubric Detail  Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.ContentName: NURS_6050_Module01_Week01_Discussion_RubricNURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsGrid ViewList ViewExcellentGoodFairPoorMain PostingPoints Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsSupported by at least three current, credible sources.Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.Supported by at least three credible sources.Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Responds to some of the discussion question(s).One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsSomewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Post is cited with two credible sources.Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.Contains some APA formatting errors.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Contains only one or no credible sources.Not written clearly or concisely.Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.Main Post: TimelinessPoints Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)Posts main post by day 3.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not post by day 3.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsFirst ResponsePoints Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsProvides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.Second ResponsePoints Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsDemonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsCommunication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.ParticipationPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Assignments Total Points: 100Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week01_Discussion_RubricAssignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points BriefNURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsIt may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since.As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsIn this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.To Prepare:Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations.Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by each of the last three U.S. presidential administrations.Reflect on the focus of their respective agendas, including the allocation of financial resources for addressing the healthcare issue you selected.Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsThe Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page, an introduction, purpose statement, and a conclusion. This is an APA paper.Part 1: Agenda Comparison GridUse the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations and their agendas related to the public health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it.Describe the administrative agenda focus related to the issue you selected.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsIdentify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue.Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.At least 3 resources must be usedPart 2: Agenda Comparison Grid AnalysisUsing the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected?How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda for the current and two previous presidents? How does it stay there?Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents?NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPart 3: NarrativeUsing the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Be sure to address the following:Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsBy Day 7 of Week 2Submit your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Narrative.Submission and Grading InformationTo submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.Click the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.Click the Week 2 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Assignments Rubric Detail  Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.ContentName: NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_RubricGrid ViewList ViewExcellentGoodFairPoorPart 1: Agenda Comparison Grid–Identify a population health concern-Describe the Population Health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it.Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)The response clearly and accurately identifies and describes a population health concern.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)The response vaguely identifies and describes a population health concern.Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)The response inaccurately identifies and describes a population health concern.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Identification and description of a population health concern is missing or incomplete.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPart 1: Agenda Comparison Grid-NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Assignments– Describe the administrative agenda focus related to this issue for the current and two previous presidents.– Identify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue.– Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)The response clearly and accurately describes the presidential administrations’ focus related to the concern, the financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and explains how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. At least 3 resources are used.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)The response vaguely describes the presidential administrations’ focus related to the concern, the financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and explains how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Only 2 resources are used.Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)The response inaccurately describes the presidential administrations’ focus related to the concern, the financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Only 1 resource is used.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)The description of the presidential administrations’ focus related to the concern, financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and explanation for how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue is missing. No resources are used.Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Assignments-Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected?-How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay there?-Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents?NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)-The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue.-Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there.– The response clearly and accurately identifies the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)-The response vaguely identifies an administrative agency which may be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Assignments-Response adequately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there.-Identification of the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is vague.Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)-Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected health care issue is inaccurate.-Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or inaccurate.-Identification of the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)-Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing.-Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague and inaccurate or is missing.-Identification of the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is vague and inaccurate or is missing.Narrative:Based on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy-maker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Assignments-Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. -Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issuesPoints Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)Creates a well-developed, accurate, and narrative.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsThe response provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponses accurately and thoroughly justify in detail the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)Creates an accurate and thorough narrative.The response provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that may support the summary provided.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponses accurately justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)Creates a narrative that is partially accurate or incomplete.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsThe response provides a vague or inaccurate summary of outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.The responses partially justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)The response provides a vague and inaccurate summary of no outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation, or is missing. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the summary provided.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponses justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or is missing.Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsA clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPurpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuationPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_RubricDiscussion: Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care ActRegardless of political affiliation, individuals often grow concerned when considering perceived competing interests of government and their impact on topics of interest to them. The realm of healthcare is no different. Some people feel that local, state, and federal policies and legislation can be either helped or hindered by interests other than the benefit to society.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsConsider for example that the number one job of a legislator is to be reelected. Cost can be measured in votes as well as dollars. Thus, it is important to consider the legislator’s perspective on either promoting or not promoting a certain initiative in the political landscape.To Prepare:Review the Resources and reflect on efforts to repeal/replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).Consider who benefits the most when policy is developed and in the context of policy implementation.By Day 3 of Week 3Post an explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the voters views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re-elected. Please check your discussion grading rubric to ensure your responses meet the criteria.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsBy Day 6 of Week 3Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by expanding on their explanation and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example.*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues. Rubric Detail  Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.ContentName: NURS_6050_Module02_Week03_Discussion_RubricNURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsGrid ViewList ViewExcellentGoodFairPoorMain PostingPoints Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.Supported by at least three current, credible sources.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsWritten clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsAt least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.Supported by at least three credible sources.Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Responds to some of the discussion question(s).One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Post is cited with two credible sources.Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsContains some APA formatting errors.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Contains only one or no credible sources.Not written clearly or concisely.Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.Main Post: TimelinessPoints Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)Posts main post by day 3.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not post by day 3.First ResponsePoints Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.Second ResponsePoints Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsCommunication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsProvides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.ParticipationPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. Total Points: 100Name: NURS_6050_Module02_Week03_Discussion_RubricAssignment: Legislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy StatementAs a nurse, how often have you thought to yourself, If I had anything to do about it, things would work a little differently? Increasingly, nurses are beginning to realize that they do, in fact, have a role and a voice.Many nurses encounter daily experiences that motivate them to take on an advocacy role in hopes of impacting policies, laws, or regulations that impact healthcare issues of interest. Of course, doing so means entering the less familiar world of policy and politics. While many nurses do not initially feel prepared to operate in this space effectively, the reward is the opportunity to shape and influence future health policy.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsTo Prepare:Select a bill that has been proposed (not one that has been enacted) using the congressional websites provided in the Learning Resources.The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Legislation Grid; 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement)Be sure to add a title page, an introduction, purpose statement, and a conclusion. This is an APA paper.Part 1: Legislation GridBased on the health-related bill (proposed, not enacted) you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy StatementBased on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following:NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsAdvocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.At least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources are used.By Day 7 of Week 4Submit your completed legislation grid and testimony/advocacy statement. Rubric Detail  Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsContentName: NURS_6050_Module02_Week04_Assignment_RubricGrid ViewList ViewExcellentGoodFairPoorFederal and State LegislationPart 1: Legislation GridBased on the health-related bill you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:• Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.• Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.• Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.• Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)The response clearly and accurately summarizes in detail the legislative intent of the health-related bill.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsThe response accurately identifies in detail the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill.The response accurately identifies in detail the populations targeted by the health-related bill. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsThe response clearly and thoroughly describes in detail the current status of the health-related bill.Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)The response accurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill.The response accurately identifies the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill.The response accurately identifies the populations targeted by the health-related bill.The response accurately describes the current status of the health-related bill.Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)The response vaguely or inaccurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsThe response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill.The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the populations targeted by the health-related bill.The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the current status of the health-related bill.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)Summary of the legislative intent of the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.Identification of the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill are vague and inaccurate or is missing.Identification of the populations targeted by the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsThe description of the current status of the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.Advocating for LegislationPart 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy StatementBased on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following:• Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.• Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)Testimony clearly and thoroughly provides statements that fully justifies a position for a health-related bill. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse provides a detailed, thorough, and logical explanation of how to address opponents to the position for the health-related bill and includes one or more clear and accurate supporting examples. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsA complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources is provided. The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the responses provided.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)Testimony clearly and accurately provides statements that somewhat justifies a position for a health-related bill.Response provides an accurate explanation of how to address opponents to the position for the health-related bill and may include at least one supporting example.An accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource is provided. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that may support the responses provided.Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Testimony used to justify a position for a health-related bill is vague or inaccurate. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsExplanation of how to address the opponents to the position for the health-related bill is vague or inaccurate, lacks logic, and/or the supporting examples are vague or inaccurate. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsA vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources is provided. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)Testimony used to justify a position for a health-related bill is vague and inaccurate, incomplete, or is missing.Explanation of how to address the opponents to the position for the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources is provided, or is missing. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses provided.Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuationPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100Name: NURS_6050_Module02_Week04_Assignment_RubricDiscussion: Professional Nursing and State-Level RegulationsBoards of Nursing (BONs) exist in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands. Similar entities may also exist for different regions. The mission of BONs is the protection of the public through the regulation of nursing practice. BONs put into practice state/region regulations for nurses that, among other things, lay out the requirements for licensure and define the scope of nursing practice in that state/region.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsIt can be a valuable exercise to compare regulations among various state/regional boards of nursing. Doing so can help share insights that could be useful should there be future changes in a state/region. In addition, nurses may find the need to be licensed in multiple states or regions.To Prepare:Review the Resources and reflect on the mission of state/regional boards of nursing as the protection of the public through the regulation of nursing practice.Consider how key regulations may impact nursing practice.Review key regulations for nursing practice of your state’s/region’s board of nursing and those of at least one other state/region and select at least two APRN regulations to focus on for this Discussion..NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsBy Day 3 of Week 5Post a comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations in your state/region with those of at least one other state/region. Describe how they may differ. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain how the regulations you selected may apply to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) who have legal authority to practice within the full scope of their education and experience. Provide at least one example of how APRNs may adhere to the two regulations you selected.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsBy Day 6 of Week 5Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days and explain how the regulatory environment and the regulations selected by your colleague differ from your state/region. Be specific and provide examples.*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues. Rubric Detail  Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.ContentName: NURS_6050_Module03_Week05_Discussion_RubricNURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsGrid ViewList ViewExcellentGoodFairPoorMain PostingPoints Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsSupported by at least three current, credible sources.Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.Supported by at least three credible sources.Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Responds to some of the discussion question(s).One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsSomewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Post is cited with two credible sources.Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsContains some APA formatting errors.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Contains only one or no credible sources.Not written clearly or concisely.Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.Main Post: TimelinessPoints Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)Posts main post by day 3.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not post by day 3.First ResponsePoints Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsDemonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.Second ResponsePoints Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsCommunication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse is on topic and may have some depth.Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.ParticipationPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. Total Points: 100Name: NURS_6050_Module03_Week05_Discussion_RubricAssignment: Regulation for Nursing Practice Staff Development MeetingNursing is a very highly regulated profession. There are over 100 boards of nursing and national nursing associations throughout the United States and its territories. Their existence helps regulate, inform, and promote the nursing profession. With such numbers, it can be difficult to distinguish between BONs and nursing associations, and overwhelming to consider various benefits and options offered by each.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsBoth boards of nursing and national nursing associations have significant impacts on the nurse practitioner profession and scope of practice. Understanding these differences helps lend credence to your expertise as a professional. In this Assignment, you will practice the application of such expertise by communicating a comparison of boards of nursing and professional nurse associations. You will also share an analysis of your state board of nursing.To Prepare:Assume that you are leading a staff development meeting on regulation for nursing practice at your healthcare organization or agency.Review the NCSBN and ANA websites to prepare for your presentation.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsThe Assignment: (8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation)Develop a 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint Presentation that addresses the following:Describe the differences between a board of nursing and a professional nurse association.Describe the board for your specific region/area.Who is on the board?How does one become a member of the board?Describe at least one state regulation related to general nurse scope of practice.How does this regulation influence the nurse’s role?How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare?Describe at least one state regulation related to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs).How does this regulation influence the nurse’s role?How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare?Include Speaker Notes on Each Slide (except on the title page and reference page)NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsBy Day 7 of Week 6Submit your Regulation for Nursing Practice Staff Development Meeting Presentation. Rubric Detail  Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.ContentName: NURS_6050_Module03_Week06_Assignment_RubricGrid ViewList ViewExcellentGoodFairPoorBoards of Nursing vs. Professional Nurse AssociationsDevelop a 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:·  Describe the differences between a board of nursing and a professional nurse association.·  Describe the members of the board for your specific region/area.·   Who is on the board?·  How does one become a member of the board?·  Speaker notes are included on every slide and are used to explain and elaborate the significant points on each slide.Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)The response accurately and thoroughly describes the differences between a board of nursing and professional nurse associations.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse provides a complete and accurate description of who is on a board of nursing.The response provides a detailed and thorough explanation of how one becomes a member of the board of nursing.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsSpeaker notes are included on every slide and are used to explain and elaborate the significant points on each slide.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)The response accurately describes the differences between a board of nursing and professional nurse associations.Responses provides an accurate description of who is on a board of nursing.The response provides an accurate explanation how one becomes a member of the board of nursing.Speaker notes are included on every slide and are used to explain the significant points on each slide.Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)Description of the differences between a board of nursing and professional nurse associations is inaccurate or incomplete. Description of who is on a board of nursing is incomplete or inaccurate.Explanation of how one becomes a member of the board of nursing is vague or inaccurate.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsSpeaker notes are included on every slide.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)Description of the differences between a board of nursing and professional nurse associations is inaccurate and incomplete or is missing.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsDescription of who is on a board of nursing detailing academic credentials, practice positions, and licensure status is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing.Explanation of how one becomes a member of the board is vague and inaccurate or is missing.No speaker notes.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsThe Impact of State Regulation on Nurse PracticeDescribe at least one state regulation related to general nurse scope of practice.·  How does this regulation influence the nurse’s role?·  How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare?·  Has there been any change to the regulation within the past 5 years? Explain.·  Speaker notes are included on every slide and are used to explain and elaborate the significant points on each slide.Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)Response includes a complete and accurate description that fully details how one or more state regulations are related to general nurse scope of practice.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse clearly and accurately explains in detail how the regulation(s) influences the nurse’s role.Response clearly and accurately explains in detail how the regulation(s) influences delivery, cost, and access to healthcare. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPresentation includes speaker notes that explain and elaborate the points of the presentation.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)Response includes an accurate description of how one state regulation is related to general nurse scope of practice.Response accurately explains how the regulation influences the nurse’s role.Response accurately explains how the regulation(s) influences delivery, cost, and access to healthcare.Presentation includes speaker notes that explain the points of the presentation.Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)Description of one or more state regulations that are related to general nurse scope of practice is incomplete or inaccurate. Explanation of how the regulation(s) influences the nurse’s role is vague or inaccurate. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsExplanation of how the regulation(s) influences delivery, cost, and access to healthcare is vague or inaccurate. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPresentation includes speaker notes that are incomplete or lack appropriate explanation.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)Description of one or more state regulations related to general nurse scope of practice is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Explanation of how the regulation(s) influences the nurse’s role is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Explanation of how the regulation(s) influences delivery, cost, and access to healthcare is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Speaker notes are incomplete or missing altogether.Describe at least one state regulation related to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs).·  How does this regulation influence the nurse’s role?·  How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare?·  Speaker notes are included on every slide and are used to explain and elaborate the significant points on each slide.Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)Response includes a complete and accurate description that fully details how one or more state regulations are related to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs).Response clearly and accurately explains in detail how the regulation(s) influences the nurse’s role. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse clearly and accurately explains in detail how the regulation(s) influences delivery, cost, and access to healthcare.Presentation includes speaker notes that explain and elaborate the points of the presentation.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)Response includes an accurate description of how one state regulation is related to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs). NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse accurately explains how the regulation influences the nurse’s role.Response accurately explains how the regulation(s) influences delivery, cost, and access to healthcare. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPresentation includes speaker notes that explain the points of the presentation.Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)Description of one or more state regulations that are related to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) is incomplete or inaccurate.Explanation of how the regulation(s) influences the nurse’s role is vague or inaccurate.Explanation of how the regulation(s) influences delivery, cost, and access to healthcare is vague or inaccurate.Presentation includes speaker notes that are incomplete or lack appropriate explanation.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)Description of one or more state regulations related to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsExplanation of how the regulation(s) influences the nurse’s role is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Explanation of how the regulation(s) influences delivery, cost, and access to healthcare is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Speaker notes are incomplete or missing altogether.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPurpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsNo purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuationPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100Name: NURS_6050_Module03_Week06_Assignment_RubricDiscussion 1: Evidence Base in DesignWhen politics and medical science intersect, there can be much debate. Sometimes anecdotes or hearsay are misused as evidence to support a particular point. Despite these and other challenges, however, evidence-based approaches are increasingly used to inform health policy decision-making regarding causes of disease, intervention strategies, and issues impacting society. One example is the introduction of childhood vaccinations and the use of evidence-based arguments surrounding their safety.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsIn this Discussion, you will identify a recently proposed health policy and share your analysis of the evidence in support of this policy.To Prepare:Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy.Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and development of this health policy.By Day 3 of Week 7Post a description of the health policy you selected and a brief background for the problem or issue being addressed. Explain whether you believe there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy and explain why. Be specific and provide examples.By Day 6 of Week 7Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by either supporting or respectfully challenging their explanation on whether there is an evidence base to support the proposed health policy they described.*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Assignments Rubric Detail  Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.ContentName: NURS_6050_Module04_Week07_Discussion_RubricGrid ViewList ViewExcellentGoodFairPoorMain PostingPoints Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.Supported by at least three current, credible sources.Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsAt least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.Supported by at least three credible sources.Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Responds to some of the discussion question(s).One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Post is cited with two credible sources.Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsContains some APA formatting errors.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Contains only one or no credible sources.Not written clearly or concisely.Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.Main Post: TimelinessPoints Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)Posts main post by day 3.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not post by day 3.First ResponsePoints Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsCommunication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.Second ResponsePoints Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.ParticipationPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. Total Points: 100Name: NURS_6050_Module04_Week07_Discussion_RubricDiscussion 2: The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-MakingWord cloud generators have become popular tools for meetings and team-building events. Groups or teams are asked to use these applications to input words they feel best describe their team or their role. A “word cloud” is generated by the application that makes prominent the most-used terms, offering an image of the common thinking among participants of that role.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsWhat types of words would you use to build a nursing word cloud? Empathetic, organized, hard-working, or advocate would all certainly apply. Would you add policy-maker to your list? Do you think it would be a very prominent component of the word cloud?Nursing has become one of the largest professions in the world, and as such, nurses have the potential to influence policy and politics on a global scale. When nurses influence the politics that improve the delivery of healthcare, they are ultimately advocating for their patients. Hence, policy-making has become an increasingly popular term among nurses as they recognize a moral and professional obligation to be engaged in healthcare legislation.To Prepare:Revisit the Congress.gov website provided in the Resources and consider the role of RNs and APRNs in policy-making.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsReflect on potential opportunities that may exist for RNs and APRNs to participate in the policy-making process.By Day 3 of Week 8Post an explanation of at least two opportunities that exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policy-making. Explain some of the challenges that these opportunities may present and describe how you might overcome these challenges. Finally, recommend two strategies you might make to better advocate for or communicate the existence of these opportunities to participate in policy-making. Be specific and provide examples.By Day 6 of Week 8Respond to at least two of your colleagues’* posts by suggesting additional opportunities or recommendations for overcoming the challenges described by your colleagues.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Assignments*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues. Rubric Detail  Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.ContentName: NURS_6050_Module04_Week08_Discussion_RubricGrid ViewList ViewExcellentGoodFairPoorMain PostingPoints Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.Supported by at least three current, credible sources.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsWritten clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsAt least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.Supported by at least three credible sources.Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Responds to some of the discussion question(s).One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Post is cited with two credible sources.Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.Contains some APA formatting errors.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsDoes not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Contains only one or no credible sources.Not written clearly or concisely.Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsMain Post: TimelinessPoints Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)Posts main post by day 3.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not post by day 3.First ResponsePoints Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsProvides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsCommunication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.Second ResponsePoints Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsCommunication is professional and respectful to colleagues.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.ParticipationPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. Total Points: 100Name: NURS_6050_Module04_Week08_Discussion_RubricAssignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and ImplementationAs their names imply, the honeyguide bird and the honey badger both share an affinity for honey. Honeyguide birds specialize in finding beehives but struggle to access the honey within. Honey badgers are well-equipped to raid beehives but cannot always find them. However, these two honey-loving species have learned to collaborate on an effective means to meet their objectives. The honeyguide bird guides honey badgers to newly discovered hives. Once the honey badger has ransacked the hive, the honey guide bird safely enters to enjoy the leftover honey.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsMuch like honeyguide birds and honey badgers, nurses and health professionals from other specialty areas can—and should—collaborate to design effective programs. Nurses bring specialties to the table that make them natural partners to professionals with different specialties. When nurses take the requisite leadership in becoming involved throughout the healthcare system, these partnerships can better design and deliver highly effective programs that meet objectives.In this Assignment, you will practice this type of leadership by advocating for a healthcare program. Equally as important, you will advocate for a collaborative role of the nurse in the design and implementation of this program. To do this, assume you are preparing to be interviewed by a professional organization/publication regarding your thoughts on the role of the nurse in the design and implementation of new healthcare programs.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsTo Prepare:Review the Resources and reflect on your thinking regarding the role of the nurse in the design and implementation of new healthcare programs.Select a healthcare program within your practice and consider the design and implementation of this program.Reflect on advocacy efforts and the role of the nurse in relation to healthcare program design and implementation.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsThe Assignment: (2–4 pages)In a 2- to 4-page paper, create an interview transcript of your responses to the following interview questions:Tell us about a healthcare program, within your practice. What are the costs and projected outcomes of this program?Who is your target population?What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?What is your role as an advocate for your target population for this healthcare program? Do you have input into design decisions? How else do you impact design?What is the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation? How does this role vary between design and implementation of healthcare programs? Can you provide examples?Who are the members of a healthcare team that you believe are most needed to implement a program? Can you explain why?NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Assignments Rubric Detail  Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.ContentName: NURS_6050_Module04_Week08_Assignment_RubricGrid ViewList ViewExcellentGoodFairPoorProgram DesignIn a 2- to 4-page paper, create an interview transcript of your responses to the following interview questions. ·   Tell us about a healthcare program within your practice. What are the costs and projected outcomes of this program?·   Who is your target population?·   What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?·   What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?·   What is your role as an advocate for your target population for this healthcare program? Do you have input into design decisions? How else do you impact design?NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 41 (41%) – 45 (45%)Response provides a clear and complete summary of the healthcare program, including an accurate and detailed description of the costs and projected outcomes of the program. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse provides a clear and accurate description that fully describes the target population.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse provides a clear and accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, including specific examples.Response provides an accurate and detailed description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions as well as fully explaining impacts to program design.Points Range: 36 (36%) – 40 (40%)Response provides a summary of the healthcare program, including a description of the costs and project outcomes of the program.Response provides an accurate description of the target population.Response provides an accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, including some examples.Response provides an accurate description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected.Response provides an accurate explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and somewhat explains impacts to program design.Points Range: 31 (31%) – 35 (35%)Response provides a summary of the healthcare program that is vague or incomplete or does not include costs or projected outcomes of the program. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsDescription of the target population is vague or inaccurate.Explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program is vague, inaccurate, or does not include specific examples.Description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected is vague or inaccurate.Explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and impacts to program design is vague or inaccurate.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)Response provides a summary of the healthcare program that is vague and inaccurate, does not include costs or projected outcomes of the program, or is missing.Description of the target population is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, and specific examples is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsDescription of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and impacts to program design is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Program Implementation·  What is the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation? How does this role vary between design and implementation of healthcare programs? Can you provide examples?·   Who are the members of a healthcare team that you believe are most needed to implement a program? Can you explain why you think this?Points Range: 36 (36%) – 40 (40%)Response provides a clear, accurate, and complete explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs, including specific examples. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse provides an accurate and detailed description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected.The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)Response provides an accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation.Response provides an accurate explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs, and may include some specific examples.Response provides and accurate description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected.The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that may support the summary provided.Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)Explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation is vague, inaccurate, and/or incomplete.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsExplanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs is vague or inaccurate and/or does not include specific examples. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsDescription of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected is inaccurate or incomplete.The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 27 (27%)Explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected is vague and inaccurate, incomplete, or is missing.The response fails to integrate any resources to support the summary provided.Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsA clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPurpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuationPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100Name: NURS_6050_Module04_Week08_Assignment_RubricDiscussion: The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy EvaluationIn the Module 4 Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy-making. A critical component of any policy design is evaluation of the results. How comfortable are you with the thought of becoming involved with such matters?NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsSome nurses may be hesitant to get involved with policy evaluation. The preference may be to focus on the care and well-being of their patients; some nurses may feel ill-equipped to enter the realm of policy and political activities. However, as you have examined previously, who better to advocate for patients and effective programs and polices than nurses? Already patient advocates in interactions with doctors and leadership, why not with government and regulatory agencies?In this Discussion, you will reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation.To Prepare:In the Module 4 Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy-making.Review the Resources and reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsBy Day 3 of Week 9Post an explanation of at least two opportunities that currently exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policy review. Explain some of the challenges that these opportunities may present and describe how you might overcome these challenges. Finally, recommend two strategies you might make to better advocate for or communicate the existence of these opportunities. Be specific and provide examples.By Day 6 of Week 9Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by suggesting additional opportunities or recommendations for overcoming the challenges described by your colleagues.*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues. Rubric Detail  Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.ContentName: NURS_6050_Module05_Week09_Discussion_RubricNURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsGrid ViewList ViewExcellentGoodFairPoorMain PostingPoints Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.Supported by at least three current, credible sources.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsWritten clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.Supported by at least three credible sources.Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Responds to some of the discussion question(s).One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsSomewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Post is cited with two credible sources.Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsContains some APA formatting errors.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Contains only one or no credible sources.Not written clearly or concisely.Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.Main Post: TimelinessPoints Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)Posts main post by day 3.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not post by day 3.First ResponsePoints Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsDemonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsCommunication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.Second ResponsePoints Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsCommunication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.ParticipationPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. Total Points: 100Name: NURS_6050_Module05_Week09_Discussion_RubricAssignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy EvaluationNURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsProgram/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can be used to ultimately improve program services or policy initiatives.Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy.To Prepare:Review the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template provided in the Resources.Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you.Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described.The Assignment: (2–3 pages)Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsDescribe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.How was the success of the program or policy measured?How many people were reached by the program or policy selected?How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsBy Day 7 of Week 10Submit your completed healthcare program/policy evaluation analysis. Rubric Detail  Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.ContentName: NURS_6050_Module05_Week10_Assignment_RubricNURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsGrid ViewList ViewExcellentGoodFairPoorProgram/Policy EvaluationBased on the program or policy evaluation you seelcted, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:·   Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.·   How was the success of the program or policy measured?·   How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?·   At what point in time in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)Response clearly and accurately describes in detail the healthcare program or policy outcomes.Response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the success of the program or policy was measured. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse clearly and accurately describes in detail how many people were reached by the program or policy and fully describes the impact of the program or policy. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse clearly and accurately indicates the point at which time the program or policy evaluation was conducted.Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)Response accurately describes the healthcare program or policy outcomes.Response accurately explains how the success of the program or policy was measured.Response accurately describes how many people were reached by the program or policy and accurately describes the impact of the program or policy.Response accurately indicates the point at which time the program or policy evaluation was conducted.Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)Description of the healthcare program or policy outcomes is inaccurate or incomplete.Explanation of how the success of the program or policy was measured is inaccurate or incomplete. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsDescription of how many people were reached by the program or policy and the impact is vague or inaccurate.Response vaguely describes the point at which the program or policy evaluation was conducted.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)Description of the healthcare program or policy outcomes is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing.Explanation of how the success of the program or policy was measured is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing.Description of how many people were reached by the program or policy and the associated impacts is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Response of the point at which time the program or policy was conducted is missing.Reporting of Program/Policy Evaluations·   What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?·   What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?·   What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit the most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.·   Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?·   Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?·   Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)Response clearly and accurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation.Response clearly and thoroughly explains in detail specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse clearly and accurately explains in detail the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation.Response clearly and accurately explains in detail who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse includes a thorough and accurate explanation of whether the program met the original intent and outcomes, including an accurate and detailed explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.Response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of whether the program should be implemented, including an accurate and detailed explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)Response accurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation.Response explains in detail specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation.Response explains in detail the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation.Response explains who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation.Response includes an accurate explanation of whether the program met the original intent and outcomes, including an accurate explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.Response includes an accurate explanation of whether the program should be implemented, including an accurate explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation.Explanation of specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation is vague or incomplete. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsExplanation of the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation is vague or inaccurate.Explanation of who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation is vague or inaccurate.Explanation of whether the program/policy met the original intent and outcomes and the reasons why or why not is incomplete or inaccurate.Explanation of whether the program or policy should be implemented, and the reasons why or why not, is incomplete or inaccurate.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)Identification of the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Explanation of specific information on outcomes and unitended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation is vague and incomplete, or is missing.Explanation of the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Explanation of who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Explanation of whether the program or policy met the original intent and outcomes and the reasons why or why not is incomplete and inaccurate, or is missing. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsExplanation of whether the program or policy should be implemented, and the reasons why or why not, is incomplete and inaccurate, or is missing.Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsA clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPurpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuationPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100Name: NURS_6050_Module05_Week10_Assignment_RubricAssignment: Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix and Narrative StatementNote: This Assignment is due on Day 5 of Week 11.If you talk about a possible poor health outcome, do you believe that outcome will occur? Do you believe eye contact and personal contact should be avoided?You would have a difficult time practicing as a nurse if you believed these to be true. But they are very real beliefs in some cultures.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsDifferences in cultural beliefs, subcultures, religion, ethnic customs, dietary customs, language, and a host of other factors contribute to the complex environment that surrounds global healthcare issues. Failure to understand and account for these differences can create a gulf between practitioners and the public they serve.In this Assignment, you will examine a global health issue and consider the approach to this issue by the United States and by one other country.To Prepare:Review the World Health Organization’s (WHO) global health agenda and select one global health issue to focus on for this Assignment.Select at least one additional country to compare to the U.S. for this Assignment.Reflect on how the global health issue you selected is approached in the U.S. and in the additional country you selected.Review and download the Global Health Comparison Matrix provided in the Resources.The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Global Health Comparison Matrix; 1-page Plan for Social Change)NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPart 1: Global Health Comparison MatrixFocusing on the country you selected and the U.S., complete the Global Health Comparison Matrix. Be sure to address the following:Consider the U.S. national/federal health policies that have been adapted for the global health issue you selected from the WHO global health agenda. Compare these policies to the additional country you selected for study.Explain the strengths and weaknesses of each policy.Explain how the social determinants of health may impact the global health issue you selected. Be specific and provide examples.Using the WHO’s Organization’s global health agenda as well as the results of your own research, analyze how each country’s government addresses cost, quality, and access to the global health issue selected.Explain how the health policy you selected might impact the health of the global population. Be specific and provide examples.Explain how the health policy you selected might impact the role of the nurse in each country.Explain how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in both countries. Be specific and provide examples.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPart 2: A Plan for Social ChangeReflect on the global health policy comparison and analysis you conducted in Part 1 of the Assignment and the impact that global health issues may have on the world, the U.S., your community, as well as your practice as a nurse leader.In a 1-page response, create a plan for social change that incorporates a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.Explain how you would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact your local practice and role as a nurse leader.Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice as a nurse leader represents and contributes to social change. Be specific and provide examples Rubric Detail  Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsContentName: NURS_6050_Module06_Week11_Assignment_RubricGrid ViewList ViewExcellentGoodFairPoorGlobal Healthcare Issues and PoliciesPart 1: Global Health Comparison MatrixFocusing on the country you selected and the U.S., complete the Global Health Comparison Matrix. Be sure to address the following:• Consider the U.S. national/federal health policies that have been adapted for the global health issue you selected from the WHO global health agenda. Compare these policies to the additional country you selected for study.Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country.Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and in another country. Specific examples are provided.Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse provides a clear and accurate explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the health of the global population. Detailed and accurate supporting examples are provided.Response provides a clear and complete explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse.Response provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in each of the two countries.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)Response provides an explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse provides an explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and in another country. Specific examples may be provided.Response provides an explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue.Response provides an explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the health of the global population. Supporting examples may be provided.Response provides an explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse provides an explanation of how the global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in each of the two countries.Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country is vague or inaccurate.Explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and another country, and/or the examples, are vague or inaccurate.Explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue is vague or inaccurate.Explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the health of the global population, and/or supporting examples, is vague or inaccurate.Explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse is vague or incomplete.Explanation of how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in each of the two countries is vague or inaccurate.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)Explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and in another country, and the examples, are vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the global population, and supporting examples, is missing.Explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsExplanation of how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in both countries is missing.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsThe Nurse’s Role in Global HealthcarePart 2: A Plan for Social ChangeReflect on the global health policy comparison and analysis you conducted in Part 1 of the Assignment. In a 1-page response, create a plan for social change that incorporates a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.• Explain how you would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.• Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact your local practice and role as a nurse leader.• Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice as a nurse leader represents and contributes to social change. Be specific and provide examples.Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)Response provides a clear and thorough explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse provides a clear and thorough explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsResponse clearly and thoroughly explains in detail how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens in one’s role as a nurse represents and contributes to social change. Accurate and detailed supporting examples are provided.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)Response provides an explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader.Response provides an explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader.Response explains how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens in one’s role as a nurse represents and contributes to social change. Some supporting examples are provided.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)Explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader is vague or incomplete. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsExplanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader is vague or incomplete.Explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens in one’s role as a nurse represents and contributes to social change, and/or supporting examples provided, are vague or incomplete.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)Explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader is vague and incomplete, or is missing.Explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader is vague and incomplete, or is missing. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsExplanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens in one’s role as a nurse represents and contributes to social change, and/or supporting examples, is missing.Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsA clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPurpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuationPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsPoints Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health AssignmentsWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100Name: NURS_6050_Module06_Week11_Assignment_RubricNURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Assignments 

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: