Expert Homework Help Online & Write My Essay Service

Hire best homework helpers for online homework help 24/7. Are you looking for online homework help? Try our excellent homework help who can help you get A+ grade in your assignment.

Order my paper
Calculate your essay price
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

19 k happy customers
9.5 out of 10 satisfaction rate
527 writers active

NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion : Health and Health Promotion

NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion : Health and Health Promotion NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion : Health and Health PromotionWeek 1: Health and Health PromotionMuch like archaeologists sift through sand to identify artifacts of interest, nurse practitioners must devote time and effort to interviewing patients, sifting through facts to identify relevant information that can be pieced together to create a relevant patient history. These efforts have their own unique challenges and approaches based on the characteristics of the patient, including sex, age, culture, and more.Female patient interviews have their own unique characteristics. Sensitive matters related to sexual health, physical and/or emotional abuse, pregnancy, menstruation, and other topics may leave patients uncomfortable and create challenges to productive conversations.For this week, you will examine the role of the patient interview in health promotion. You also will practice approaches to building a patient history by interviewing a volunteer by creating a script which you use to conduct a mock patient interview with the volunteer.NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion : Health and Health PromotionLearning ObjectivesStudents will:Analyze professional interests of studyAnalyze the different roles related to the a CRNP (certified registered nurse practitioner), a CNM (certified nurse midwife), and a PA (Physician Assistant)Create scripts for taking a health history to include difficult questionsDevelop patient health histories related to difficult questions*These Learning Objectives are introduced this week and assessed in Week 2.Learning ResourcesORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERERequired Readings (click to expand/reduce)Required Media (click to expand/reduce)Optional Resources (click to expand/reduce)Discussion: Different Roles of the Nurse PractitionerThe term ‘history” is broad in meaning. Within that broad framework archeologists tend to focus their careers on various specialties and areas of interest, such as specific historical eras or geographical areas.So it is with nurses. Within the broad framework of healthcare, nurse practitioners focus their careers on various roles. These roles may in part be based on narrower areas of interest such as women’s health. Careers also focus on selected technical nursing specialties.Photo Credit: Getty Images/Blend ImagesFor this Discussion, you will explore your professional interests and those interests are addressed in specific guidelines and competencies. You also examine the different nurse practitioner roles related to women’s health and how these roles might impact the way you work.To prepare:NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion : Health and Health PromotionReview the modular structure of this course and reflect on how each module defines the specific skills needed as an advanced Nurse Practitioner (NP).Review the ANA guidelines, NP competencies, and the Ethic resources found in this week’s Learning Resources and consider how they impact the work of the NP.By Day 3Post a brief explanation about the differences in roles related to a CRNP, a CNM, and a PA and how each of these roles might impact the how you practice as a FNP. Be specific and provide examples.Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.By Day 6Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts on two different days and provide additional insight to your colleagues related to issues and topics they may want to also consider. Use the Learning Resources and/or the best available evidence from current literature to support your explanation.Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit! Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.ContentName: NRNP_6552_Week1_Discussion_RubricNRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion : Health and Health PromotionGrid ViewList ViewExcellentPoint range: 90–100GoodPoint range: 80–89FairPoint range: 70–79PoorPoint range: 0–69Main Posting:Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s).Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.Supported by at least 3 current credible sources.NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion : Health and Health PromotionPoints Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Responds to most of the discussion question(s).Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.Supported by at least 3 credible references.Points Range: 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)Responds to some of the discussion question(s).One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion : Health and Health PromotionPost is cited with fewer than 2 credible references.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)Does not respond to the discussion question(s).Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Contains only 1 or no credible references.Main Posting:WritingPoints Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Written clearly and concisely.Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.Further adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Written concisely.May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Written somewhat concisely.May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.Contains some APA formatting errors.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Not written clearly or concisely.Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.Main Posting:Timely and full participationPoints Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.Posts main discussion by due date.Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Posts main discussion by due date. NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion : Health and Health PromotionMeets requirements for full participation.Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Posts main discussion by due date.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Does not meet requirements for full participation.Does not post main discussion by due date.First Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Responds to questions posed by faculty.The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Response is on topic, may have some depth.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.First Response:WritingPoints Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.Response is written in Standard, Edited English.NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion : Health and Health PromotionPoints Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Few or no credible sources are cited.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication.Response to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.First Response:Timely and full participationPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.Posts by due date.Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Meets requirements for full participation.Posts by due date.Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)Posts by due date.Points Range: 2 (2%) – 2 (2%)Does not meet requirements for full participation.Does not post by due date.Second Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Responds to questions posed by faculty.The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion : Health and Health PromotionPoints Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Response is on topic, may have some depth.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.Second Response:WritingPoints Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion : Health and Health PromotionResponse is written in Standard, Edited English.Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Few or no credible sources are cited.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication.Response to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.Second Response:Timely and full participationPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date.Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date.Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)Posts by due date.Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. Total Points: 100Name: NRNP_6552_Week1_Discussion_RubricThere are many professional designations to care for obstetric patients, all professionals share a similar view on the importance of focusing on the mother’s physical, psychological, and social well-being throughout the childbearing cycle. According to Rick and Ballweg (2017), these various professionals have in common that they are trained under the medical model or advanced nursing model in an accelerated, efficient, and cost-effective time frame to deliver quality, team-based health care tailored to need. Although the professional duties differ somewhat between a certified registered nurse practitioner (CRNP), certified nurse-midwife (CNM), and physician assistant (PA), there is some overlap in their responsibilities.NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion : Health and Health PromotionNurse practitioners are quickly becoming the health partner of choice for millions of people. NPS practice in nearly every health care setting. As clinicians, NPs blend clinical expertise in diagnosing and treating health conditions, emphasizing disease prevention and health management (Cimiotti et al., 2019). Also, NPs bring a comprehensive perspective and personal touch to health care. NPs practice autonomously and in coordination with health care professionals. The nurse practitioner role is consistent with the APRN consensus model practicing in the population, focusing on family, pediatrics, women’s health, adult-geriatrics, neonatal, and psychiatric mental health (Cimiotti et al., 2019). The scope of practice is not setting specific but rather based on the patient’s needs (American Nurses Association,n.d.). Nurse practitioners typically care for a particular population of people. For example, they may specialize in adult and geriatric health, pediatric health, or psychiatric and mental health.NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion : Health and Health PromotionIn contrast, the certified nurse-midwife program includes didactic coursework and clinical experiences that prepare them to work in a number of settings, including hospitals, health clinics, birth centers, and OB/GYN practices (Hastings-Tolsma et al., 2018). Compared to NPs and CNMs, physician assistants typically are more disease-centered. They work with physicians to identify problems with patients and brainstorm treatments and eventual cures. Their goal is to work with physicians to get patients as healthy as possible and back on their feet (Rick & Ballweg, 2017). PAs undergo more generalized education but can also specialize in emergency medicine, orthopedics, and surgeries.  The roles of CRNP, CNM, and PA will undoubtedly impact my practice as an FNP. The FNP plays an essential role because this is the entry-level where patients enter primary care and build a foundation of their care. FNPs are well situated to provide preventive care that can help prevent diseases later in life. However, if the patient needs specialized care, the FNP must coordinate care and refer the patient to specific roles. For instance, a pregnant woman needs specialized care. Although FNP has to refer the patient to CNM for prenatal care, FNP build the foundation of good health for the patient to carry a healthy pregnancy. Similarly, CNM do not need to see all women. FNP can provide care to women as they are not only concerned with female reproductive needs, but they also treat women throughout their lives, typically from adolescence through old age.NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion : Health and Health PromotionReferencesAmerican Nurses Association (ANA). (n.d.). Scope of practice. https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/scope-of-practice/Cimiotti, J. P., Li, Y., Sloane, D. M., Barnes, H., Brom, H. M., & Aiken, L. H. (2019). Regulation of the nurse practitioner workforce: Implications for care across settings. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 10(2), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2155-8256(19)30113-9Hastings-Tolsma, M., Foster, S., Brucker, M. C., Nodine, P., Burpo, R., Camune, B., Griggs, J., & Callahan, T. J. (2018). Nature and scope of certified nurse-midwifery practice: A workforce study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(21-22), 4000–4017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14489Rick, T. J., & Ballweg, R. (2017). Physician assistants and the expanding global health-care workforce. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 97(3), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.17-0176You did a good job on your post. Like you I came across similar articles and explanations on how these fields are inter-related. Having worked as a nurse for 26 years I have come across all these fields. It is confusing at first as they overlap each other. They key is like you said that they all work together to provide care for the child bearing woman ( Morgan, P. A., Smith, V. A., Z Berkowitz, T., S., Edelman, D., Van Houtven, C., H., Woolson, S. L., NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion : Health and Health Promotion. . . Jackson, G. L. (2019).. The advantage nurse practitioners have over physician assistants is the independent practice option (American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) (2017). Like any health care provider as more nurse practitioner go into work force and get experience in their fields their quality improves over time. After a certain amount of time the quality of care provider by a MD, DO or NP is the same ( American Nurses Association. (n.d.). I have interacted with many NP’s and PA’s who were used as a resource by MD’s and DO’s as the NP’s and PA’s . These NP/PA’s had seen and done more over their life time than the newly minted MDs that had been in the field.American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) (2017). Education. Retrieved from https://www.aanp.org/education.American Nurses Association. (n.d.). ANA enterprise. http://www.nursingworld.orgMorgan, P. A., Smith, V. A., Z Berkowitz, T., S., Edelman, D., Van Houtven, C., H., Woolson, S. L., . . . Jackson, G. L. (2019). Impact of physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants on utilization and costs for complex patients. Health Affairs, 38(6), 1028-1036. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00014NRNP 6552 Week 1 Discussion : Health and Health Promotion

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: