Expert Homework Help Online & Write My Essay Service

Hire best homework helpers for online homework help 24/7. Are you looking for online homework help? Try our excellent homework help who can help you get A+ grade in your assignment.

Order my paper
Calculate your essay price
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

19 k happy customers
9.5 out of 10 satisfaction rate
527 writers active

MHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS

MHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONSMHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONSWeek 5 will focus on capital acquisition and how businesses raise the funds required to acquire land, buildings, and equipment. The unit will discuss capital investment decisions and capital budgeting. The lectures will cover the basic concepts of capital budgeting, including how to estimate a project’s cash flows and measure its expected financial impact.Your Learning Objectives for the WeekDevelop, analyze, and draw conclusions from a healthcare organization’s (HCO’s) budget.Demonstrate sound financial decision making in light of strategic, operational, and economic conditions.Develop and analyze financial plans for operations and capital expenditures.Conduct a financial statement analysis and identify strategic and operational strengths and vulnerabilities.MHC6305 Week 5 Discussion AND Project InstructionsPage | 1Week 5 Discussion Instructions…Before beginning work on this discussion forum, please review the link “Doing Discussion Questions Right,” the expanded grading rubric for the forum, and any specific instructions for this topic.Before the end of the unit, begin commenting on at least two of your classmates’ responses. You can ask technical questions or respond generally to the overall experience. Be objective, clear, and concise. Always use constructive language, even in criticism, to work toward the goal of positive progress. Submit your responses in the Discussion Area.MHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONSORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE For multihospital systems, scenario analysis has both advantages and disadvantages.· Assess whether the advantages or disadvantages are greater.· Assess whether financial analysis should or shouldn’t play a dominant role in capital budgeting decisions.· Provide reasons for and evidence in support of your responses.Comment on the postings of two of your classmates. Is your assessment the same or different? Why or why not?To support your work, use your course and textbook readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.   Submission Details:· Your initial posting should be addressed at 300-500 words. Submit your document to this Discussion Area by the due date assigned. Be sure to cite your sources using APA format.· Respond to your peers throughout the unit. Justify your answers with examples, research, and reasoning. Follow up posts need to be submitted by the end of the week.Use the following rubric as a guide to complete your discussion responses.MHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS Week 5 Project Instructions…Before beginning work on this assignment, please review the expanded grading rubric for specific instructions relating to content and formatting. · Describe the three types of project risks and detail the situation in which each type is most relevant when making a capital budgeting decision. Be sure to include the effect of correlation.· Compare and contrast cash accounting methodology and accrual accounting methodology in order to illustrate how each works best for different types of companies.Submission Details:· To support your work, use your course and textbook readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.·  Your assignment should be addressed in an 8- to 10-page document.·  Submit your document to this appropriate Submissions Area by the due date assigned.MHC6305 WEEK 5 LECTURE Page | 1Capital ProjectsCapital projects may be complex, but basically, the cash outlay is not recovered until the project is terminated. This cash outlay becomes equity invested in the project. This equity may be determined by a strategic value to the organization, or it may consist of some cost that cannot be recovered. In any case, investment in a strategic asset carries some expectation of a return in the form of income from that investment. It may take many years to recover a strategic investment through income from that investment. This period is termed “time to breakeven.” Many of the measures of financial health, such as return on investment and internal rate of return, hinge on this income. Net present value is a measure of various cash flows from the investment over time that really give an idea of what the investment is worth, and this may be compared to what was expended on that investment. In a large organization, there are many projects that are desirable but only so much money can be expended on capital purchase. Internal rate of return and net present value are two measures that can be used to rank alternative investment options and determine which has the greatest potential for return on the investment, making it easier to select which of the projects to go forward with. It is good for organizations to review the results of the budgeting process with the actual results achieved through investment of capital in order to fine-tune their tools and assumptions in making future investments.MHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONSThe social value of a project can be a major factor in a capital project and the risk associated with it. For example, the organization, say a clinic, could be considering the expense of a million-dollar radiology machine for doing rapid breast cancer screening. The machine is only used for screening and has little profit per procedure, if any. This would be a terrible project from a purely financial standpoint, but the social value of saving many in the community from a major cancer that is common and deadly is enormous. This factor must be considered. It should also be used to promote the ideals of the organization.MHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS Project Risk AnalysisCapital budgeting risk analysis includes three elements: defining the relevant risk, assessing that risk, and incorporating the assessment into the decision process. In capital budgeting, financial risk is related to uncertainty about a project’s profitability. If any of the forecasted cash flows are not known with certainty, the project’s forecasted profitability is uncertain and hence risk is present. As in all investments, risk is the primary determinant of a project’s required rate of return (discount rate)MHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS. Different types of project risk can be defined and, at least in theory, measured: Stand-alone and Corporate. The risk that is relevant to a particular analysis depends on the situation at hand. Stand-alone risk assumes that the project will be operated in isolation and hence ignores any portfolio effects. It is measured by the amount of uncertainty in forecasted profitability—the greater the uncertainty, the greater the risk. Corporate risk concerns the risk that a project brings to the organization as a whole. The risk may be small or large, but it is best if it is within the average range of risk of all the projects undertaken by the corporation. Risk is always inherent in any project, but there are ways to limit the risk. Risk can be limited by transference to another party by way of insurance. Taking steps to reduce the risk and share it with another party, such as a community fund that guarantees a certain participation rate, can mitigate it.MHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONSIt will always be unwise for a leader to enter into any project without knowing the risks and assessing them as a part of the decision-making process. Some projects have more risk than others. When choosing which projects to fund, the manager should take into account the social value of each project and the ability to limit the risk.Risk Analysis TechniquesRisk analysis of standalone projects in HCOs can be complex. Two methods are commonly used, and they are relatively simple to use. Sensitivity analysis examines a project’s value based on things such as the change in net present value brought by given changes in an input variable such as the volume of items sold. Here is an example. You want to buy an x-ray machine and determine the sensitivity of its net present value based on the number of procedures you expect to do per day, with a low, a medium, and a high valuation. Scenario analysis is another tool and works somewhat like a spreadsheet. When you make reasonable changes to the inputs, such as income, it is easy to see the likely net value under that condition. In many situations, a low, a medium, and a high version of the input is sufficient to cover the likely circumstances. The low and high versions might also be termed least likely and most likely, respectively. An example might be returns using 4%,MHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS 6%, and 8% as scenarios. When these tools are used to determine the best case or most likely case for the profitability of projects, it is possible to estimate the value of the project and compare it to the cost of capital to the organization. It is common today to find that there are more projects than there is funding for projects, so it is important to know how to get the best bang for your buck.Lastly, we turn our attention to capital investment decisions, or how those funds can be deployed (spent) in the most financially efficient manner. The overall process of choosing capital investments is called capital budgeting. Perhaps the most critical part of capital budgeting is cash flow estimation because the financial value of proposed projects is the cash flows they are expected to produce. The basic concepts of capital budgeting include how to estimate a project’s cash flows and how to measure its expected financial impact. Like all investment decisions, risk plays a critical role. We will learn how to assess the risk of a project as well as how to incorporate that assessment into the capital budgeting decision process6/28/2021 Rubric Assessment – MHC6305-Financial Management of Healthcare Organizations SU01 – South Universityhttps://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=78100&evalObjectId=386599&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&groupId=0&rubricId=6574&d2l_b… 1/2MHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONSClosePrint Rubric SUO Discussion Rubric (80 Points) – Version 1.2 Course: MHC6305-Financial Management of Healthcare Organizations SU01/ 40Response No Submission 0 pointsEmerging (F-D: 1-27) 27 pointsSatisfactory (C: 28-31) 31 pointsProficient (B: 32-35) 35 pointsExemplary (A: 36-40) 40 pointsCriterion ScoreQuality of InitialPostingNo initial posting exists toevaluate.The information provided isinaccurate, not focused onthe assignment’s topic,and/or does not answer thequestion(s) fully. Responsedemonstrates incompleteunderstanding of the topicand/or inadequatepreparation.The information provided isaccurate, giving a basicunderstanding of the topic(s)covered. A basicunderstanding is when youare able to describe theterms and concepts covered.Despite this basicunderstanding, initialposting may not includecomplete development of allaspects of the assignment.The information provided isaccurate, displaying a goodunderstanding of the topic(s)covered. A goodunderstanding is when youare able to explain the termsand topics covered. Initialposting demonstratessincere reflection andaddresses most aspects ofthe assignment, although allconcepts may not be fullydeveloped.The information provided isaccurate, providing an in-depth, well thought-outunderstanding of the topic(s)covered. An in-depthunderstanding provides ananalysis of the information,synthesizing what is learnedfrom the course/assignedreadings.MHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS/ 20Participation No Submission 0 pointsEmerging (F-D: 1-13) 13 pointsSatisfactory (C: 14-16) 16 pointsProficient (B: 17-18) 18 pointsExemplary (A: 19-20) 20 pointsCriterion ScoreParticipation inDiscussionNo responses to otherclassmates were posted inthis discussion forum.May include one or more ofthe following:*Comments to only oneother student’s post.*Comments are notsubstantive, such as just oneline or saying, “Good job” or“I agree.*Comments are off topic.Comments to two or moreclassmates’ initial posts butonly on one day of theweek. Comments aresubstantive, meaning theyreflect and expand on whatthe other student wrote.Comments to two or moreclassmates’ initial posts onmore than one day.Comments are substantive,meaning they reflect andexpand on what the otherstudent wrote.MHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONSComments to two or moreclassmates’ initial posts andto the instructor’s comment(if applicable) on two ormore days. Responsesdemonstrate an analysis ofpeers’ comments, buildingon previous posts.Comments extend anddeepen meaningfulconversation and mayinclude a follow-upquestion.6/28/2021 Rubric Assessment – MHC6305-Financial Management of Healthcare Organizations SU01 – South Universityhttps://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=78100&evalObjectId=386599&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&groupId=0&rubricId=6574&d2l_b… 2/2Total / 80Overall Score/ 20Writing No Submission 0 pointsEmerging (F-D: 1-13) 13 pointsSatisfaction (C: 14-16) 16 pointsProficient (B: 17-18) 18 pointsExemplary (A: 19-20) 20 pointsCriterion ScoreWriting Mechanics(Spelling, Grammar,Citation Style) andInformationLiteracyNo postings for which toevaluate language andgrammar exist.Numerous issues in any ofthe following: grammar,mechanics, spelling, use ofslang, and incomplete ormissing citations andreferences. If required forthe assignment, did not usecourse, text, and/or outsidereadings (where relevant) tosupport work.Some spelling, grammatical,and/or structural errors arepresent. Some errors informatting citations andreferences are present. Ifrequired for the assignment,utilizes sources to supportwork for initial post but notcomments to otherstudents. Sources includecourse/text readings butoutside sources (whenrelevant) include non-academic/authoritative,such as Wikis and .comresources.MHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONSMinor errors in grammar,mechanics, or spelling in theinitial posting are present.Minor errors in formattingcitations and references mayexist. If required for theassignment, utilizes sourcesto support work for both theinitial post and some of thecomments to otherstudents. Sources includecourse and text readings aswell as outside sources(when relevant) that areacademic and authoritative(e.g., journal articles, othertext books, .gov Web sites,professional organizationWeb sites, cases, statutes,or administrative rules).Minor to no errors exist ingrammar, mechanics, orspelling in both the initialpost and comments toothers. Formatting ofcitations and references iscorrect. If required for theassignment, utilizes sourcesto support work for both theinitial post and thecomments to otherstudents. Sources includecourse and text readings aswell as outside sources(when relevant) that areacademic and authoritative(e.g., journal articles, othertext books, .gov Web sites,professional organizationWeb sites, cases, statutes,or administrative rules).No Submission 0 points minimumThere was no submissionfor this assignment.Emerging (F to D Range) 1 point minimumSatisfactory progress has not been met onthe competencies for this assignment.Satisfactory (C Range) 56 points minimumSatisfactory progress has been achieved onthe competencies for this assignment.Proficient (B Range) 64 points minimumProficiency has been achieved on thecompetencies for this assignment.Exemplary (A Range) 72 points minimumThe competencies for thisassignment have been mastered.6/28/2021 Rubric Assessment – MHC6305-Financial Management of Healthcare Organizations SU01 – South Universityhttps://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=78100&evalObjectId=394548&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=237558&… 1/3MHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONSClosePrint Rubric MHC6305 Week 5 Project Rubric Course: MHC6305-Financial Management of Healthcare Organizations SU01/ 75Criteria No Submission 0 pointsEmerging (F through D range) (1–51) 51 pointsSatisfactory (C range) (52–59) 59 pointsProficient (B range) (60–66) 66 pointsExemplary (A range) (67–75) 75 pointsCriterion ScoreIncludes allassignmentcomponents andmeets graduatelevel criticalthinking. A purposestatement isidentified for theresponse.Student did not submitassignmentWork minimally meetsassignmentexpectations. Nopurpose statement isprovided.Assignment meetssome expectationswith minimal depthand breath. Purposestatement is vague.Assignment meetsmost of expectationswith all componentsbeing addressed ingood depth andbreadth. Purposestatement is presentand appropriate forthe assignment.Assignment meets allexpectations withexceptional depth andbreath. Acomprehensivepurpose statementdelineates allrequirements of theassignment.MHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS/ 75Criteria No Submission 0 pointsEmerging (F through D range) (1–51) 51 pointsSatisfactory (C range) (52–59) 59 pointsProficient (B range) (60–66) 66 pointsExemplary (A range) (67–75) 75 pointsCriterion ScoreIntegrates andunderstandsassignmentsconcepts andtopics.Student did not submitassignment.Shows some degree ofunderstanding ofassignment concepts.Demonstrates a clearunderstanding ofassignment concepts.Demonstrates theability to evaluate andapply key assignmentconcepts.Demonstrates theability to evaluate,apply and integratekey assignmentconcepts.Criteria No Submission 0 pointsEmerging (F through D range) (1–51) 51 pointsSatisfactory (C range) (52–59) 59 pointsProficient (B range) (60–66) 66 pointsExemplary (A range) (67–75) 75 pointsCriterion Score6/28/2021 Rubric Assessment – MHC6305-Financial Management of Healthcare Organizations SU01 – South Universityhttps://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=78100&evalObjectId=394548&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=237558&… 2/3Total / 250/ 75Criteria No Submission 0 pointsEmerging (F through D range) (1–51) 51 pointsSatisfactory (C range) (52–59) 59 pointsProficient (B range) (60–66) 66 pointsExemplary (A range) (67–75) 75 pointsCriterion ScoreSynthesizes,analyses, andevaluates resourcesto apply conceptsin the assignment.Student did not submitassignment.Does not interpret,apply, and synthesizeconcepts, and/orstrategies.Summarizesinformation gleanedfrom sources tosupport major points,but does notsynthesize. Providesminimal justification tosupport major topics.Uses 1 credibleresource in theassignment.MHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONSSynthesizes andjustifies (defends,explains, validates,confirms) informationgleaned from sourcesto support majorpoints presented. Usesa minimum of 2credible resources inthe assignment.Synthesizes andjustifies (defends,explains, validates,confirms) informationgleaned from sourcesto support majorpoints presented. Uses3 credible resourcesfor the assignment,including at least 1scholarly peer-reviewed resource./ 25Criteria No Submission 0 pointsEmerging (F through D range) (1–17) 17 pointsSatisfactory (C range) (18–19) 19 pointsProficient (B range) (20–22) 22 pointsExemplary (A range) (23–25) 25 pointsCriterion ScoreUses correctspelling, grammar,and professionalvocabulary.Provides credibleresources usingcorrect APAformat.Student did not submitassignmentContains many (≥ 5)grammar, spelling,punctuation and APAerrors that interferewith the reader’sunderstanding.MHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONSContains a few (3-4)grammar, spelling,punctuation and APAerrors.Uses correct grammar,spelling, andpunctuation with noerrors. Contains a few(1–2) APA formaterrors.Uses correct grammar,spelling, andpunctuation with noerrors. Uses correctAPA format with noerrors.6/28/2021 Rubric Assessment – MHC6305-Financial Management of Healthcare Organizations SU01 – South Universityhttps://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=78100&evalObjectId=394548&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=237558&… 3/3Overall ScoreNo Submission 0 points minimumEmerging (F through D range) 1 point minimumSatisfactory (C range) 175 points minimumProficient (B range) 200 points minimumExemplary (A range) 225 points minimumMHC6305 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: