Expert Homework Help Online & Write My Essay Service

Hire best homework helpers for online homework help 24/7. Are you looking for online homework help? Try our excellent homework help who can help you get A+ grade in your assignment.

Order my paper
Calculate your essay price
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

19 k happy customers
9.5 out of 10 satisfaction rate
527 writers active

Discussion: Treatment of Sleep/Wake Disorders

Discussion: Treatment of Sleep/Wake DisordersDiscussion: Treatment of Sleep/Wake DisordersThe power of sleep to heal the body cannot be underestimated. Most research indicates that 7–8 hours of sleep are a minimum that people need to stay healthy. Clients who come to the PMHNP’s office frequently complain of sleep problems. It is estimated that 10–20% of patients report some type of sleeping problem.In this Discussion, you will analyze the diagnostic criteria and evidence-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for sleep/wake disorders.ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERELearning ObjectivesStudents will:· Analyze diagnostic criteria for sleep/wake disorders· Analyze evidence-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for sleep/wake disorders· Analyze criteria for referring clients to primary care physicians for treatment of sleep/wake disorders· Compare differential diagnostic features of sleep/wake disordersTo prepare for this Discussion:· Your Instructor will have assigned you a sleep/wake disorder, which will be the focus of your original post for this Discussion. Insomnia· Review the Learning Resources.By Day 3Post:· Explain the diagnostic criteria for your assigned Insomnia disorder.· Explain the evidenced-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for Insomnia disorder.· Describe at what point you would refer the client to their primary care physician for an additional referral to a neurologist, pulmonologist, or physician specializing in sleep disorders and explain why.· Support your rationale with references to the Learning Resources or other academic resource.Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learnhttps://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033600_1 1/4Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.Discussion: Treatment of Sleep/Wake DisordersOutstandingPerformance Excellent PerformanceCompetent PerformancePro�cient PerformanceRoom for ImprovementMain Posting: Response to the discusion question is re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.44 (44%) – 44 (44%)* Thoroughly responds to the discusion question(s) *is re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. * supported by at least 3 current, credible sources40 (40%) – 43 (43%)* Responds to the discusion question(s) *is re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references35 (35%) – 39 (39%)* Responds to most of the discusion question(s) *is somewhat re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references31 (31%) – 34 (34%)* Responds to some of the discusion question(s) * one to two criteria are not addressed or are super�cially addresed *is somewhat lacking re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis *somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references0 (0%) – 30 (30%)* Does not respond to the discusion question(s) * lacks depth or super�cially addresses criteria *lacks re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis *does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * contains only 1 or no credible referencesName: NRNP_6670_Week10_Discussion_Rubric EXITGrid View List View1/22/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learnhttps://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033600_1 2/4OutstandingPerformance Excellent PerformanceCompetent PerformancePro�cient PerformanceRoom for ImprovementMain Posting: Writing6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Written clearly and concisely * Contains no grammatical or spelling errors * Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Discussion: Treatment of Sleep/Wake Disorders* Written clearly and concisely * May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Written concisely * May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style4 (4%) – 5 (5%) *Writtten somewhat concisely * May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors * Contains some APA formatting erros0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Not written clearly or concisely * Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and styleMain Posting: Timely and full participation10 (10%) – 10 (10%)* meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts main discussion by due date0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * does not meet requirement for full participationFirst Reponse Post to colleague’s main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.9 (9%) – 9 (9%) * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)* response is on topic, may have some depth0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth1/22/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learnhttps://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033600_1 3/4OutstandingPerformance Excellent PerformanceCompetent PerformancePro�cient PerformanceRoom for ImprovementFirst Reponse: Writing6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are citedFirst Reponse: Timely and full participation5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) Discussion: Treatment of Sleep/Wake Disorders- 0 (0%) * does not meet requirement for full participationSecond Reponse: Post to colleague’s main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.9 (9%) – 9 (9%) * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)Discussion: Treatment of Sleep/Wake Disorders* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)* response is on topic, may have some depth0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth1/22/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learnhttps://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033600_1 4/4OutstandingPerformance Excellent PerformanceCompetent PerformancePro�cient PerformanceRoom for ImprovementSecond Reponse: Writing6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Discussion: Treatment of Sleep/Wake Disorders* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are citedSecond Reponse: Timely and full participation5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * does not meet requirement for full participationTotal Points: 100Name: NRNP_6670_Week10_Discussion_RubricEXITDiscussion: Treatment of Sleep/Wake Disorders

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: