Expert Homework Help Online & Write My Essay Service

Hire best homework helpers for online homework help 24/7. Are you looking for online homework help? Try our excellent homework help who can help you get A+ grade in your assignment.

Order my paper
Calculate your essay price
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

19 k happy customers
9.5 out of 10 satisfaction rate
527 writers active

Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper

Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment PaperCritique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment PaperA research critique demonstrates your ability to critically read an investigative study. For this assignment, choose a research article related to nursing.· Articles used for this assignment cannot be used for the other assignments (students should find new research articles for each new assignment).· The selected articles should be original research articles. Review articles, concept analysis, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, integrative review, and systemic review should not be used.· Mixed-methods studies should not be used. Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper· Dissertations should not be used.· Research articles shouldn’t be more then 5 years oldYour critique should include the following:Research Problem/Purpose· State the problem clearly as it is presented in the report.· Have the investigators placed the study problem within the context of existing knowledge?· Will the study solve a problem relevant to nursing?· State the purpose of the research.Review of the Literature· Identify the concepts explored in the literature review.· Were the references current? If not, what do you think the reasons are?· Was there evidence of reflexivity in the design (qualitative)? Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment PaperTheoretical Framework· Are the theoretical concepts defined and related to the research?· Does the research draw solely on nursing theory or does it draw on theory from other disciplines?· Is a theoretical framework stated in this research piece?· If not, suggest one that might be suitable for the study.Variables/Hypotheses/Questions/Assumptions (Quantitative)· What are the independent and dependent variables in this study?· Are the operational definitions of the variables given? If so, are they concrete and measurable?· Is the research question or the hypothesis stated? What is it?Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment PaperConceptual Underpinnings, Research Questions (Qualitative)· Are key concepts defined conceptually?· Is the philoosoophical basis, underlying tradition, conoceptual framework, or ideological orientation made explicit and is it appropriate for the problem?· Are research questions explicitly stated? Are the questions consistent with the study’s philosophical basis, underlying tradition, conceptual framework, or ideological orientation?Methodology· What type of design (quantitative, qualitative, and type) was used in this study?· Was inductive or deductive reasoning used in this study?Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper· State the sample size and study population, sampling method, and study setting.· Did the investigator choose a probability or non-probability sample?· State the type of reliability and the validity of the measurement tools (quantitative only)Qualitative studies (answer the following questions in addition to those above except the last bulleted item)· Were the methods of gathering data appropriate?· Were data gathered through two or more methods to achieve triangulation?· Did the researcher ask the right questions or make the right observations and were they recorded in an appropriate fashion?Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper· Was a sufficient amount of data gathered?· Was the data of sufficient depth and richness?Were ethical considerations addressed? Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants?Data Analysis· What data analysis tool was used?· Was saturation achieved? (qualitative)· How were the results presented in the study?· Were the data management (e.g., coding) and data analysis methods sufficiently described? (qualitative)· Identify at least one (1) finding.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment PaperSummary/Conclusions, Implications, and Recommendations· Do the themes adequately capture the meaning of the data?· Did the analysis yield an insightful, provocative and meaningful picture of the phenomenon under investigation?· Were methods used to enhance the trustworthiness of the data (and analysis) and was the description of those methods adequate?· Are there clear explanation of the boundaries/limitations, thick description, audit trail?· What are the strengths and limitations of the study?· In terms of the findings, can the researcher generalize to other populations? Explain.· Evaluate the findings and conclusions as to their significance for nursing (both qualitative and quantitative).The body of your paper should be 4–6 double-spaced pages plus a cover page and a reference page. The critique must be attached to the article and follow APA guidelines.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment PaperList of articles that were used in past papers THAT CANNOT BE USED AGAINUminski, K., Komenda, P., Whitlock, R., Ferguson, T., Nadurak, S., Hochheim, L., … & Rigatto, C. (2018). Effect of post-discharge virtual wards on improving outcomes in heart failure and non-heart failure populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one, 13(4), e0196114.Vernon, D., Brown, J. E., Griffiths, E., Nevill, A. M., & Pinkney, M. (2019). Reducing readmission rates through a discharge follow-up service. Future healthcare journal, 6(2), 114.The body of your paper should be 4–6 double-spaced pages plus a cover page and a reference page. The critique must be attached to the article and follow APA guidelines. PLEASE USE ARTICLES UPLOADEDCritique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment PaperA research critique demonstrates your ability to critically read an investigative study. For this assignment, choose a research article related to nursing.Articles used for this assignment cannot be used for the other assignments (students should find new research articles for each new assignment).The selected articles should be original research articles. Review articles, concept analysis, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, integrative review, and systemic review should not be used.Mixed-methods studies should not be used.Dissertations should not be used.Your critique should include the following:Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment PaperResearch Problem/PurposeState the problem clearly as it is presented in the report.Have the investigators placed the study problem within the context of existing knowledge?Will the study solve a problem relevant to nursing?State the purpose of the research.Review of the LiteratureIdentify the concepts explored in the literature review.Were the references current? If not, what do you think the reasons are?Was there evidence of reflexivity in the design (qualitative)?Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment PaperTheoretical FrameworkAre the theoretical concepts defined and related to the research?Does the research draw solely on nursing theory or does it draw on theory from other disciplines?Is a theoretical framework stated in this research piece?If not, suggest one that might be suitable for the study.Variables/Hypotheses/Questions/Assumptions (Quantitative)What are the independent and dependent variables in this study?Are the operational definitions of the variables given? If so, are they concrete and measurable?Is the research question or the hypothesis stated? What is it?Conceptual Underpinnings, Research Questions (Qualitative)Are key concepts defined conceptually?Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment PaperIs the philoosoophical basis, underlying tradition, conoceptual framework, or ideological orientation made explicit and is it appropriate for the problem?Are research questions explicitly stated? Are the questions consistent with the study’s philosophical basis, underlying tradition, conceptual framework, or ideological orientation?MethodologyWhat type of design (quantitative, qualitative, and type) was used in this study?Was inductive or deductive reasoning used in this study?State the sample size and study population, sampling method, and study setting.Did the investigator choose a probability or non-probability sample?State the type of reliability and the validity of the measurement tools (quantitative only)Qualitative studies (answer the following questions in addition to those above except the last bulleted item)Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment PaperWere the methods of gathering data appropriate?Were data gathered through two or more methods to achieve triangulation?Did the researcher ask the right questions or make the right observations and were they recorded in an appropriate fashion?Was a sufficient amount of data gathered?Was the data of sufficient depth and richness?Were ethical considerations addressed? Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants?Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment PaperData AnalysisWhat data analysis tool was used?Was saturation achieved? (qualitative)How were the results presented in the study?Were the data management (e.g., coding) and data analysis methods sufficiently described? (qualitative)Identify at least one (1) finding.Summary/Conclusions, Implications, and RecommendationsDo the themes adequately capture the meaning of the data?Did the analysis yield an insightful, provocative and meaningful picture of the phenomenon under investigation?Were methods used to enhance the trustworthiness of the data (and analysis) and was the description of those methods adequate?Are there clear explanation of the boundaries/limitations, thick description, audit trail?What are the strengths and limitations of the study?In terms of the findings, can the researcher generalize to other populations? Explain.Evaluate the findings and conclusions as to their significance for nursing (both qualitative and quantitative).The body of your paper should be 4–6 double-spaced pages plus a cover page and a reference page. The critique must be attached to the article and follow APA guidelines.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment PaperNeed APA Help? You must submit the research study articles along with your assignment.Review the rubric for further information on how your assignment will be graded.RubricNURS_350_OL – NURS350-Research Critique NURS_350_OL – NURS350-Research CritiqueCriteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Problem/Purpose 28 to >24.92 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsResearch problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are clearly identified.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper 24.92 to >21.0 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsResearch problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are somewhat identified. 21 to >16.52 ptsBelow ExpectationsResearch problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are mostly absent or misidentified.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper 16.52 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsResearch problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are absent. 28 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReview of the Literature 42 to >37.38 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsConcepts explored in the literature review are clearly identified. Critique of the references is included and well developed. 37.38 to >31.5 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsConcepts explored in the literature review are somewhat identified. Critique of the references is included, but may not be fully developed.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper 31.5 to >24.78 ptsBelow ExpectationsConcepts explored in the literature review are misidentified. Critique of the references is severely lacking. 24.78 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsConcepts explored in the literature review are absent. Critique of the references is absent.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper 42 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheoretical Framework 28 to >24.92 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsA theoretical concept/framework is identified and well analyzed for appropriateness. If the article lacks a concept/framework, a suitable one is suggested.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper 24.92 to >21.0 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsA theoretical concept/framework is somewhat identified and analyzed for appropriateness. If the article lacks a concept/framework, a potential concept/framework is suggested, but it is somewhat inappropriate. 21 to >16.52 ptsBelow ExpectationsA theoretical concept/framework is somewhat identified and analyzed for appropriateness. If the article lacks a concept/framework, a potential concept/framework is suggested, is not identified or is grossly inappropriate.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper 16.52 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsA theoretical concept/framework is misidentified or not analyzed for appropriateness. 28 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVariables, Hypotheses, Questions, and Assumptions 14 to >12.46 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsIV and DV are identified and defined. Discussion on measurability is included. Research question and hypothesis are identified.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper 12.46 to >10.5 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsIV and DV are somewhat identified and or partially defined. Discussion on measurability is somewhat included. Research question and hypothesis are partially identified. 10.5 to >8.26 ptsBelow ExpectationsIV and DV identification and definition are absent or severely lacking. Discussion on measurability is absent or inaccurate. Research question and hypothesis are not identified or grossly misidentified.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper 8.26 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsIV and DV identification and definition are absent. Discussion on measurability is absent. Research question and hypothesis are not identified. 14 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethodology 56 to >49.84 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsType of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are properly identified. Reliability and validity of measurement tools, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are discussed.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper 49.84 to >42.0 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsType of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are somewhat identified. Reliability and validity of measurement tools, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are discussed, but some information is inaccurate. 42 to >33.04 ptsBelow ExpectationsType of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are absent or misidentified. Reliability and validity of measurement tools, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are either absent or grossly inaccurate.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper 33.04 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsType of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are absent. Reliability and validity of measurement tools, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are absent. 56 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Analysis 42 to >37.38 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsData analysis tool is identified. An explanation on how the results are presented in the study is included and accurate. At least one finding is appropriately identified. 37.38 to >31.5 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsData analysis tool is somewhat identified. An incomplete explanation on how the results are presented in the study is included. At least one finding is identified.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper 31.5 to >24.78 ptsBelow ExpectationsData analysis tool is absent or misidentified. An explanation on how the results are presented in the study is absent or grossly unclear. Findings are not included or are grossly inaccurate. 24.78 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsData analysis tool is absent. An explanation on how the results are presented in the study is absent. Findings are not included.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper 42 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary, Conclusions, Implications, and Recommendations 56 to >49.84 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsStrengths and limitations of the study are identified. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is included. An evaluation of the findings, conclusions, and significance to nursing is included and appropriate.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper 49.84 to >42.0 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsStrengths and limitations of the study are somewhat identified. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is included but may not be fully developed. An evaluation of the findings, conclusions, and significance to nursing may not be fully developed. 42 to >33.04 ptsBelow ExpectationsStrengths and limitations of study are absent or lacking. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is absent or lacking. An evaluation of the findings, conclusions, and significance to nursing is absent or inappropriate.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper 33.04 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsStrengths and limitations of study are absent. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is absent. An evaluation of the findings, conclusions, and significance to nursing is absent. 56 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and APA Format 14 to >12.46 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsWritten in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner. Responses are mostly error free. Information from sources is appropriately paraphrased and accurately cited.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper 12.46 to >10.5 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsWriting is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is correctly paraphrased and cited. 10.5 to >8.26 ptsBelow ExpectationsWriting is generally unclear and unorganized. Some errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension. Sources are missing or improperly cited.Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper 8.26 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsWriting is unclear and unorganized. Errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension. Sources are missing. Critique of Research Article Week 8 Summative Assignment Paper

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: