Expert Homework Help Online & Write My Essay Service

Hire best homework helpers for online homework help 24/7. Are you looking for online homework help? Try our excellent homework help who can help you get A+ grade in your assignment.

Order my paper
Calculate your essay price
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

19 k happy customers
9.5 out of 10 satisfaction rate
527 writers active

Critique of Chosen Article for Evidence Assignment

Critique of Chosen Article for Evidence AssignmentCritique of Chosen Article for Evidence AssignmentInstructionsIn this paper, you will evaluate the article you chose in assignment #4 as evidence.  The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate how evidence is critically examined and recommendations for practice are generated.Elements you need to include in your critique of your chosen article are: (also be sure to use these points as headings in your paper)Problem/purposeReview of the literatureResearch question/hypothesisSampleResearch DesignThreats to external/internal validityMethodologyThe level in the evidence hierarchyInstrumentsLegal/ethical issues handlingData analysisConclusions/recommendationsImplications for EBP and how this article could be used to make an evidence-based changeBegin with an introductory paragraph, end with a closing paragraph.The paper will be 4-5 pages, use APA format, a title page, a reference page, and a total of 4 references is required.One reference will be your article.The other references should be information about critiquing research and making this evidence-based change.Critique of Chosen Article for Evidence AssignmentORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HEREPlease review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteriaResearch Article Intervention EffectivenessOluwaseun BanjoHerzing UniversityNSG 324Dr. Kaye FusonWrite your PICO question.P= patient in the acute care setting,I= nurse-led rounding programC= no rounding programO= decrease patient falls In the acute care setting, does implement a nurse-led rounding program compared to a no rounding program decrease patient falls?Critique of Chosen Article for Evidence AssignmentIdentify the intervention from your selected PICO question that you seek to support in the literature. In my search, I seek to find out is whether the implementation of a nurse-led rounding program within an acute care setting will help reduce patient fall when compared to the no rounding program (Savage, 2020).Depending on your selection of PICO questions, you will be searching for an experimental or quasi-experimental research study that shows the effectiveness of your intervention in reaching the indicated outcomes. What type of study are you searching for?  Identify the research design of a study that would meet the assignment criteria.  Based on the PIOCT question as part of the medical intervention to help reduce patient falls in an acute care setting, I chose to use an experimental approach. Essentially, experimental research required three primary properties to minimize possible threats to the generated findings on the truthfulness of results. These three properties include experimental and control group randomization. As mentioned above, randomization of control groups will minimize bias that may impact both the independent and dependent variables of the parameters involved in the study (Savage, 2020).Critique of Chosen Article for Evidence Assignment  The type of research design that may be deployed to meet the assignment critical will be randomized control.List 3-4 keywords for the intervention of your PICO question that you searched with. Why did you select these words?Critique of Chosen Article for Evidence Assignment Keywords searched  for the PICO intervention  included:Hourly Rounding, nurse-led Rounding, strategies to reduce patient falls.I used the said keywords to help get a wide range of search results on how patient falls can be reduced using the hourly Rounding or nurse lead programs within an acute care setting.Which search engine(s) did you use? (Ovid, CINAHL, Proquest) I utilized CINHALWhich limiters to the search did you check? (Randomized controlled trial, publication type->research, peer-reviewed, dates, full text, etc.)Why did you select these limiters? I used randomized control trials and peer-reviewed. The reason for selecting this limiter was to ensure that get the most appropriate article with the right content addressing the PICO question intervention.How many results did you get? How did you determine if the studies in the results meet the assignment criteria? 6,320,000 results were generated within 0.5 seconds.Critique of Chosen Article for Evidence AssignmentSince most of the results generated were peer-reviewed, I knew that they were enriched with the right content for my assignment.Did you find a study that tested the effectiveness of the intervention? Identify this study. (Write it in APA reference format)If yes, attach the study in the assignment link as a PDF file.  Yes, I located one article that indicates how hourly nurse rounding could reduce patient falls up to 95%.  Savage, A. (2020). Reducing patient falls through purposeful hourly Rounding. Reducing patient falls through purposeful hourly Rounding. doi:10.46409/sr.uozb3951If a study was not found, did you change your search techniques based on results?  No, I would not change my search techniquesIf a new search was needed, identify the changes made There would be new search needed and there would be no changes made.Did you change your search techniques based on results?Critique of Chosen Article for Evidence Assignment No, I did not   For your attached study, how did it support the intervention in your PICO question? Identify the elements it answered_P=inpatient adults.I=purposely Hourly Rounding.C=no RoundingO= reduce patient falls. From the article, the researcher examined over 360 peer reviewedarticles whose level of evidence fall between level one to level five supported purposeful hourly roundingintervention to prevent patient falls in the healthcare setting. Purposeful hourly Rounding indicated that after the elapse of 30 days, patient falls were reduced by 95% (Savage, 2020).Does the attached study answer the PICO question? What was the answer? How was this determined?  Identify the actual findings of the attached study. How did you determine the study you selected met the assignment criteria?  Yes. Patient falls were reduced by 95% within a period of 30 days.There were no records of patient falls as the nurses conducted hourly Rounding.Critique of Chosen Article for Evidence AssignmentPatient falls reduced to between a rate of 4.11 per 1000 occupied beds to 5.07  falls per 1000 occupied beds within 30 days of purposeful hourly Rounding.It utilized a quasi-experimental approach which offered higher external validity of the PICO question under study.  ReferencesGliner, M., Dorris, J., Aiyelawo, K., Morris, E., Hurdle-Rabb, D., & Frazier, C. (2021). Patient falls, nurse communication, and nurse hourly rounding in acute care: Linking patient experience and outcomes. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 28(2), E467-E470. doi:10.1097/phh.0000000000001387Savage, A. (2020). Reducing patient falls through purposeful hourly Rounding. Reducing patient falls through purposeful hourly Rounding. doi:10.46409/sr.uozb3951Critique of Chosen Article for Evidence AssignmentEstimated time to complete: 6 hours RubricNSG324 Critique RubricNSG324 Critique RubricCriteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 55 pts5Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors. 49.5 pts4Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.Critique of Chosen Article for Evidence Assignment 44 pts3Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial. 38.5 pts2Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors. 33 pts1Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.Critique of Chosen Article for Evidence Assignment 0 pts0There is no evidence of a defined statement. 55 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis 50 pts5Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 45 pts4Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.Critique of Chosen Article for Evidence Assignment 40 pts3Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 35 pts2Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities. 30 pts1Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.Critique of Chosen Article for Evidence Assignment 0 pts0Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus. 50 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting 10 pts5The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. 9 pts4The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.Critique of Chosen Article for Evidence Assignment 8 pts3The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication. 7 pts2The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication. 6 pts1The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.Critique of Chosen Article for Evidence Assignment 0 pts0The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning. 10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA 10 pts5The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references. 9 pts4The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 8 pts3The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 7 pts2The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 6 pts1Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references. 0 pts0There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references. 10 ptsCritique of Chosen Article for Evidence Assignment

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: