Expert Homework Help Online & Write My Essay Service

Hire best homework helpers for online homework help 24/7. Are you looking for online homework help? Try our excellent homework help who can help you get A+ grade in your assignment.

Order my paper
Calculate your essay price
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

19 k happy customers
9.5 out of 10 satisfaction rate
527 writers active

Building a Health History Discussion Assignment

Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentBuilding a Health History Discussion AssignmentWe are here for a great start of Week One and our patient profile assignment.This assignment is meant to assign a new patient profile for you to work on for this week. This assignment is to begin learning about “Building a Comprehensive Health History.” There are several readings as you prepare to work on the DB assignment that is due for the week.You will find the new patient profiles listed below. Take note, you will need your assigned new patient profile to complete the Discussion for this week.Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentAs per Walden University Policy, make sure you are avoiding any potential academic integrity issues.The three patient profile options are as shown:1. If your last Name is from A through G, you may use the following: 26-year-old Lebanese female living in graduate-student housingORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HEREDiscussion: Building a Health HistoryEffective communication is vital to constructing an accurate and detailed patient history. A patient’s health or illness is influenced by many factors, including age, gender, ethnicity, and environmental setting. As an advanced practice nurse, you must be aware of these factors and tailor your communication techniques accordingly. Doing so will not only help you establish rapport with your patients, but it will also enable you to more effectively gather the information needed to assess your patients’ health risks.For this Discussion, you will take on the role of a clinician who is building a health history for a particular new patient assigned by your Instructor.Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentPhoto Credit: Sam Edwards / Caiaimage / Getty ImagesTo prepare:With the information presented in Chapter 1 of Ball et al. in mind, consider the following:· By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned a new patient profile by your Instructor for this Discussion. Note: Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your new patient profile assignment.· How would your communication and interview techniques for building a health history differ with each patient?· How might you target your questions for building a health history based on the patient’s social determinants of health?Building a Health History Discussion Assignment· What risk assessment instruments would be appropriate to use with each patient, or what questions would you ask each patient to assess his or her health risks?· Identify any potential health-related risks based upon the patient’s age, gender, ethnicity, or environmental setting that should be taken into consideration.· Select one of the risk assessment instruments presented in Chapter 1 or Chapter 5 of the Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination text, or another tool with which you are familiar, related to your selected patient.· Develop at least five targeted questions you would ask your selected patient to assess his or her health risks and begin building a health history.Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentBy Day 3 of Week 1Post a summary of the interview and a description of the communication techniques you would use with your assigned patient. Explain why you would use these techniques. Identify the risk assessment instrument you selected, and justify why it would be applicable to the selected patient. Provide at least five targeted questions you would ask the patient.Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link, and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit! Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentWe are here for a great start of Week One and our patient profile assignment.This assignment is meant to assign a new patient profile for you to work on for this week. This assignment is to begin learning about “Building a Comprehensive Health History.” There are several readings as you prepare to work on the DB assignment that is due for the week.You will find the new patient profiles listed below. Take note, you will need your assigned new patient profile to complete the Discussion for this week.As per Walden University Policy, make sure you are avoiding any potential academic integrity issues.The three patient profile options are as shown:Building a Health History Discussion Assignment1. If your last Name is from A through G, you may use the following: 26-year-old Lebanese female living in graduate-student housingDiscussion: Building a Health HistoryEffective communication is vital to constructing an accurate and detailed patient history. A patient’s health or illness is influenced by many factors, including age, gender, ethnicity, and environmental setting. As an advanced practice nurse, you must be aware of these factors and tailor your communication techniques accordingly. Doing so will not only help you establish rapport with your patients, but it will also enable you to more effectively gather the information needed to assess your patients’ health risks.For this Discussion, you will take on the role of a clinician who is building a health history for a particular new patient assigned by your Instructor.Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentPhoto Credit: Sam Edwards / Caiaimage / Getty ImagesTo prepare:With the information presented in Chapter 1 of Ball et al. in mind, consider the following:· By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned a new patient profile by your Instructor for this Discussion. Note: Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your new patient profile assignment.· How would your communication and interview techniques for building a health history differ with each patient?· How might you target your questions for building a health history based on the patient’s social determinants of health?Building a Health History Discussion Assignment· What risk assessment instruments would be appropriate to use with each patient, or what questions would you ask each patient to assess his or her health risks?· Identify any potential health-related risks based upon the patient’s age, gender, ethnicity, or environmental setting that should be taken into consideration.· Select one of the risk assessment instruments presented in Chapter 1 or Chapter 5 of the Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination text, or another tool with which you are familiar, related to your selected patient.· Develop at least five targeted questions you would ask your selected patient to assess his or her health risks and begin building a health history.By Day 3 of Week 1Post a summary of the interview and a description of the communication techniques you would use with your assigned patient. Explain why you would use these techniques. Identify the risk assessment instrument you selected, and justify why it would be applicable to the selected patient. Provide at least five targeted questions you would ask the patient.Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentNote: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link, and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!Rubric DetailSelect Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.ContentName: NURS_6512_Week_1_Discussion_RubricBuilding a Health History Discussion AssignmentGrid ViewList View Excellent Good Fair PoorMain Posting Points: Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) “Answers all parts of the Discussion question(s) with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. Feedback:Building a Health History Discussion Assignment Points: Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) “Responds to the Discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) “Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. Feedback:Building a Health History Discussion Assignment Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) “Does not respond to the Discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. Feedback:Main Post: Timeliness Points: Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Posts main post by Day 3. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not post main post by Day 3. Feedback:First Response Points: Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%) “Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%) “Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. Feedback:Building a Health History Discussion Assignment Points: Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%) “Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%) “Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. Feedback:Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentSecond Response Points: Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) “Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) “Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. Feedback:Building a Health History Discussion Assignment Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) “Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%) “Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. Feedback:Participation Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on three different days. Feedback:Show Descriptions Show FeedbackMain Posting–Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentLevels of Achievement: Excellent 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) “Answers all parts of the Discussion question(s) with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. Good 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) “Responds to the Discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. Fair 35 (35%) Building a Health History Discussion Assignment- 39 (39%) “Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. Poor 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) “Does not respond to the Discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. Feedback:Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentMain Post: Timeliness–Levels of Achievement: Excellent 10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Posts main post by Day 3. Good 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A Fair 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A Poor 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not post main post by Day 3. Feedback:First Response–Levels of Achievement: Excellent 17 (17%) – 18 (18%) “Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. Good 15 (15%) Building a Health History Discussion Assignment- 16 (16%) “Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. Fair 13 (13%) – 14 (14%) “Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. Poor 0 (0%) – 12 (12%) “Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. Feedback:Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentSecond Response–Levels of Achievement: Excellent 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) “Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. Good 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) “Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. Fair 12 (12%) Building a Health History Discussion Assignment- 13 (13%) “Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. Poor 0 (0%) – 11 (11%) “Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. Feedback:Participation–Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. Good 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A Fair 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A Poor 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on three different days. Feedback:Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentTotal Points: 100Name: NURS_6512_Week_1_Discussion_RubricPLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTION BELOWFOLLOW THE RUBRIC DETAILS  ATTACHEDZERO (0) PLAGIARISMFIVE RERENCES  LESS THAN FIVE YEARS OR NOT UP TO FIVE YEARSPLEASE FOLLOW THE APA 7TH  WRITING FORMAT/STYLE.Effective communication is vital to constructing an accurate and detailed patient history. A patient’s health or illness is influenced by many factors, including age, gender, ethnicity, and environmental setting. As an advanced practice nurse, you must be aware of these factors and tailor your communication techniques accordingly. Doing so will not only help you establish rapport with your patients, but it will also enable you to more effectively gather the information needed to assess your patients’ health risks. Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentFor this Discussion, you will take on the role of a clinician who is building a health history for a particular new patient assigned by your Instructor. With the information presented in Chapter 1 of Ball et al. in mind, consider the following:By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned a new patient profile by your Instructor for this Discussion. Note: Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your new patient profile assignment.How would your communication and interview techniques for building a health history differ with each patient?Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentHow might you target your questions for building a health history based on the patient’s social determinants of health?What risk assessment instruments would be appropriate to use with each patient, or what questions would you ask each patient to assess his or her health risks?Identify any potential health-related risks based upon the patient’s age, gender, ethnicity, or environmental setting that should be taken into consideration.Select one of the risk assessment instruments presented in Chapter 1 or Chapter 5 of the Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination text, or another tool with which you are familiar, related to your selected patient.Develop at least five targeted questions you would ask your selected patient to assess his or her health risks and begin building a health history.Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentPost a summary of the interview and a description of the communication techniques you would use with your assigned patient. Explain why you would use these techniques. Identify the risk assessment instrument you selected, and justify why it would be applicable to the selected patient. Provide at least five targeted questions you would ask the patient.Analyze communication techniques used to obtain patients’ health histories based upon social determinants of healthAnalyze health-related riskApply concepts, theories, and principles related to patient interviewing, diagnostic reasoning, and recording patient informationThis is case assignment for this week’s Discussion listed below :Building a Health History Discussion Assignment38-year-old Native American pregnant female living on a reservationGood communication techniques are needed to build an accurate health history of your patient. A detailed health history is important to establish when caring for your patient, this allows you paint a detailed picture of the patient’s health history and aids in building a relationship with the patient. “The collection of family health history information is part of routine health care interactions and can inform clinical decision making and preventive services. “(Lushniak, B. 2015.) Health risk assessments are important because this gives us the opportunity to obtain a detailed collection of the patient’s family history and the patients risk for chronic diseases. (Wu. R. 2015. Para. 1.) Case B focuses on building a health history for 14-year-old biracial male living with his grandmother in a high-density public housing complex. This patient is in the adolescence stage of his life, this can promote barriers to obtaining vital information. Adolescence is time from puberty to maturity, this is the most vulnerable time of a person life and puts them at risk of risky behaviors. (Ball, J. 2019. Pg.Building a Health History Discussion Assignment 17.) This patient is subjected to peer pressure that can lead to risky behavior like drug use, alcohol use, and unprotected sex. A screening tool for adolescents that would be useful is the PACES screening tool, which stands for Parents/peers, alcohol/drugs, cigarettes, emotional issues, and school/sexuality. This screening tool assess any alcohol/drug abuse, risk for sexually transmitted disease, assess the relationship with the patient’s parents, and risk of depression. Assess the educational needs of the patient and the reading level. This patient is only 14 years old, so it would be beneficial to avoid any medical jargon that the patient may not understand to ensure the patient understands the entire interview, too many big words may push the patient away and create barriers. Another helpful communication technique would be to use open ended questions. This allows for more information to disclosed and allows the patient open up about things. 5 questions i would focus on are:Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentHow is your home life while living with your grandmother?How are you doing in school? Tell me about your friends? What kind of things are you pressured in doing by your friends?Are you ever influenced to use drugs or alcohol?Do you feel depressed or alone? Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Seidel’s guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentLushniak, B. D. Surgeon general’s perspectives: Family health history: Using the past to improve future health. Public health reports. (1), 3. Wu RR, Orlando LA Implementation of health risk assessments with family health history: barriers and benefits Postgraduate Medical Journal 2015;91:508-513.Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentEffective communication is vital to constructing an accurate and detailed patient history. A patient’s health or illness is influenced by many factors, including age, gender, ethnicity, and environmental setting. As an advanced practice nurse, you must be aware of these factors and tailor your communication techniques accordingly. Doing so will not only help you establish rapport with your patients, but it will also enable you to more effectively gather the information needed to assess your patients’ health risks.For this Discussion, you will take on the role of a clinician who is building a health history for a particular new patient assigned by your Instructor. Photo Credit: Sam Edwards / Caiaimage / Getty ImagesTo prepare:With the information presented in Chapter 1 of Ball et al. in mind, consider the following:Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentBy Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned a new patient profile by your Instructor for this Discussion. Note: Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your new patient profile assignment.How would your communication and interview techniques for building a health history differ with each patient?How might you target your questions for building a health history based on the patient’s social determinants of health?What risk assessment instruments would be appropriate to use with each patient, or what questions would you ask each patient to assess his or her health risks?Identify any potential health-related risks based upon the patient’s age, gender, ethnicity, or environmental setting that should be taken into consideration.Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentSelect one of the risk assessment instruments presented in Chapter 1 or Chapter 5 of the Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination text, or another tool with which you are familiar, related to your selected patient.Develop at least five targeted questions you would ask your selected patient to assess his or her health risks and begin building a health history.By Day 3 of Week 1Post a summary of the interview and a description of the communication techniques you would use with your assigned patient. Explain why you would use these techniques. Identify the risk assessment instrument you selected, and justify why it would be applicable to the selected patient. Provide at least five targeted questions you would ask the patient.Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link, and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentBy Day 6 of Week 1Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days who selected a different patient than you, using one or more of the following approaches:Share additional interview and communication techniques that could be effective with your colleague’s selected patient.Suggest additional health-related risks that might be considered.Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.Submission and Grading InformationGrading CriteriaTo access your rubric:Week 1 Discussion RubricPost by Day 3 of Week 1 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1To Participate in this Discussion:Week 1 DiscussionWhat’s Coming Up in Module 2?Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentPhoto Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty ImagesIn Module 2, you explore the impact of functional assessments, diversity, and sensitivity in conducting health assessments. You also examine various assessment tools and diagnostic tests used to gather information about patients’ conditions and examine their validity, reliability, and impact in conducting health assessments.Next week, you will specifically examine functional assessments as they relate to diversity and sensitivityRegistration for Shadow HealthThroughout this course, you will participate in digital clinical experiences using the online simulation tool Shadow Health. The Shadow Health digital clinical experience provides a dynamic, immersive experience designed to improve nursing skills and clinical reasoning through the examination of digital standardized patients. Using Shadow Health you will participate in health histories, focused exams, and a comprehensive assessment.Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentThere will be four Shadow Health assessment components that you will need to complete in Module’s 2 and 3:Health History Assessment (Week 3 & 4)Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentFocused Exam: Cough (Week 5) for a pediatric patient presenting with coughFocused Exam: Chest Pain (Week 7) for an adult patient presenting with chest painComprehensive (Head-to-Toe) Physical Assessment (Week 9)Before you can participate in these simulations, you will need to register for a Shadow Health account. To do this:Go to the Walden Bookstore and purchase access to Shadow Health and the required texts.Once Shadow Health has been purchased, an access code will be emailed to you from the bookstore.Review this video explaining how to register in Shadow Health: https://vimeo.com/275921826/c12d50ee6eUse the Shadow Health link located in the navigation menu on the left in the Blackboard course.Follow the prompts to register in Shadow Health. You will need the access code provided from the bookstore to register. Once registered, Shadow Health should always be accessed via the link in Blackboard.Use only Google Chrome when accessing Shadow Health and make sure all other programs are turned off on your computer. Other browsers do not work well and will not allow the Shadow Health speech to text function to work.Once registered, complete the Shadow Health Orientation in the Shadow Health website/program and review the videos designed to assist with navigating and completing assignments.Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentRead the Shadow Health Nursing Documentation Tutorial located in the Week 1 Learning Resources.Note: As nurses you typically use the word assessment to mean completing the physical exam. However, in the SOAP Note format, assessment means diagnosis so start getting in the habit of calling the physical exam exactly that.Week 2 Case StudiesIn Week 2, your Instructor will assign you a case study related to your Discussion by Day 1 of the week. Please make sure to review the “Course Announcements” area of the course to verify your assigned case study. Please plan ahead to ensure you have time to review your case study and your Learning Resources so that you can complete your Discussions and Assignments on time.Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentPhoto Credit: Getty Images/iStockphotoPracticum – Upcoming DeadlineIn the Nurse Practitioner programs of study (FNP, AGACNP, AGPCNP, and PMHNP) you are required to take several practicum courses. If you plan on taking a practicum course within the next two terms, you will need to submit your application via Meditrek .Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentFor information on the practicum application process and deadlines, please visit the Field Experience: College of Nursing: Application Process – Graduate web page.Please take the time to review the Appropriate Preceptors and Field Sites for your courses.Please take the time to review the practicum manuals, FAQs, Webinars and any required forms on the Field Experience: College of Nursing: Student Resources and Manuals web page.Field Experience: College of Nursing Quick AnswersField Experience: MSN Nurse Practitioner Practicum ManualStudent Practicum Resources: NP Student OrientationNext ModuleModule 2: Functional Assessments and Assessment ToolsWhat’s Happening in This Module?Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentModule 2: Functional Assessments and Assessment Tools is a 2-week module, Weeks 2 and 3. In this module, you consider the impact of functional assessments, diversity, and sensitivity in conducting health assessments. You also explore various assessment tools and diagnostic tests that are used to gather information about patients’ conditions and examine the validity and reliability of these tests and tools. Finally, you examine assessment techniques, health risks and concerns, and recommendations for care related to patient growth, weight, and nutrition.What do I have to do?When do I have to do it?Review your Learning Resources.Days 1–7, Weeks 2 and 3Discussion: Diversity and Health AssessmentsPost by Day 3 of Week 2, and respond to your colleagues by Day 6 of Week 2.Case Study Assignment: Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and ChildrenSubmit your Case Study Assignment by Day 6 of Week 3.DCE: Health History AssessmentYou are encouraged to work on your DCE every week. However, this Assessment is not due until Day 7 of Week 4.Go to the Module’s ContentWeek 2: Functional Assessments and Cultural and Diversity Awareness in Health AssessmentDiversity is not about how we differ. Diversity is about embracing one another’s uniqueness.Building a Health History Discussion Assignment—Ola JosephCountless assessments can be conducted on patients, but they may not be useful. In order to ensure that health assessments result in the necessary care, health assessments should take into account the impact of factors such as cultures and developmental circumstances.Learning ObjectivesStudents will:Analyze diversity considerations in health assessmentsApply concepts, theories, and principles related to examination techniques, functional assessments, and cultural and diversity awareness in health assessmentLearning ResourcesRequired Readings (click to expand/reduce)Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Seidel’s guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby. Chapter 1, “The History and Interviewing Process”  (Previously read in Week 1)This chapter highlights history and interviewing processes. The authors explore a variety of communication techniques, professionalism, and functional assessment concepts when developing relationships with patients. Chapter 2, “Cultural Competency”This chapter highlights the importance of cultural awareness when conducting health assessments. The authors explore the impact of culture on health beliefs and practices.Dains, J. E., Baumann, L. C., & Scheibel, P. (2019). Advanced health assessment and clinical diagnosis in primary care (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.Credit Line: Advanced Health Assessment and Clinical Diagnosis in Primary Care, 6th Edition by Dains, J.E., Baumann, L. C., & Scheibel, P. Copyright 2019 by Mosby. Reprinted by permission of Mosby via the Copyright Clearance Center.Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentChapter 2, “Evidenced-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines”Melton, C., Graff, C., Holmes, G., Brown, L., & Bailey, J. (2014). Health literacy and asthma management among African-American adults: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Asthma, 51(7), 703–713. doi:10.3109/02770903.2014.906605Credit Line: Health literacy and asthma management among African-American adults: An interpretative phenomenological analysis by Melton, C., Graff, C., Holmes, G., Brown, L., & Bailey, J., in Journal of Asthma, Vol. 51/Issue 7. Copyright 2014 by Taylor & Francis, Inc. Reprinted by permission of Taylor & Francis, Inc. via the Copyright Clearance Center.Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentThe authors of this study discuss the relationship between health literacy and health outcomes in African American patients with asthma.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). Cultural competence. Retrieved from https://npin.cdc.gov/pages/cultural-competence This website discusses cultural competence as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Understanding the difference between cultural competence, awareness, and sensitivity can be obtained on this website.United States Department of Human & Health Services. Office of Minority Health. (n.d.). A physician’s practical guide to culturally competent care. Retrieved June 10, 2019, from https://cccm.thinkculturalhealth.hhs.gov/Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentFrom the Office of Minority Health, this website offers CME and CEU credit and equips healthcare professionals with awareness, knowledge, and skills to better treat the increasingly diverse U.S. population they serve. Espey , D. K., Jim, M. A., Cobb, N., Bartholomew, M., Becker, T., Haverkamp, D., & Plescia, M. (2014). Leading causes of death and all-cause mortality in American Indians and Alaska Natives. American Journal of Public Health, 104(Suppl 3), S303–S311.The authors of this article present patterns and trends in all-cause mortality and leading cause of death in American Indians and Alaskan Natives.Building a Health History Discussion AssignmentWannasirikul, P., Termsirikulchai, L., Sujirarat, D., Benjakul, S., & Tanasugarn, C. (2016). Health literacy, medication adherence, and blood pressure level among hypertension older adults treated at primary health care centers. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, 47(1), 109–120.The authors of this study explore the causal relationships between health literacy, individual characteristics, literacy, culture and society, cognitive ability, medication adherence, and the blood pressure levels of hypertensive older adults receiving healthcare services at primary healthcare centers.Required Media (click to expand/reduce)Module 2 IntroductionDr. Tara Harris reviews the overall expectations for Module 2. Consider how you will manage your time as you review your media and Learning Resources for your Discussion, Case Study Lab Assignment, and your DCE Assignment (3m).Functional Assessments and Cultural and Diversity Awareness in Health Assessment – Week 2 (10m). Building a Health History Discussion Assignment

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: