Expert Homework Help Online & Write My Essay Service

Hire best homework helpers for online homework help 24/7. Are you looking for online homework help? Try our excellent homework help who can help you get A+ grade in your assignment.

Order my paper
Calculate your essay price
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

19 k happy customers
9.5 out of 10 satisfaction rate
527 writers active

Assignment: Application: Taking a Stand

Assignment: Application: Taking a StandAssignment: Application: Taking a StandEffective leaders have a high degree of self-awareness and know how to leverage their strengths in the workplace. Assessments are a valuable tool that professionals can use to learn more about themselves and consider how their temperament and preferences influence their interactions with others.As you engage in this learning process, it is important to remember that everyone—regardless of temperament type or related preferences—experiences some challenges with regard to leadership. The key to success is being able to recognize and leverage your own strengths while honoring differences among your colleagues.At some point in your leadership career, you will encounter an ethical or moral dilemma that requires you to take a stand and defend your position.Assignment: Application: Taking a StandFor this Assignment, you evaluate an issue and consider how you could act as a moral agent or advocate, facilitating the resolution of the issue for a positive outcome.ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERETo prepare:Consider the examples of leadership demonstrated in this week’s media presentation and the other Learning Resources.Assignment: Application: Taking a StandTo further your self-knowledge, you are required to complete the Kiersey Temperament as indicated in this week’s Learning Resources. Consider your leadership style, including your strengths for leading others and include your results from Kiersey Temperament Sorter to describe potential challenges related to your leadership style.Mentally survey your work environment, or one with which you are familiar, and identify a timely issue/dilemma that requires you to perform the leadership role of moral agent or advocate to improve a situation (e.g., speaking or acting on behalf of a vulnerable patient, the need for appropriate staffing, a colleague being treated unfairly).What ethical, moral, or legal skills, dispositions, and/or strategies would help you resolve this dilemma? Define the differences between ethical, moral, and legal leadership.Finally, consider the values and principles that guide the nursing profession; the organization’s mission, vision, and values; the leadership and management competencies addressed in this course; and your own values and reasons for entering the profession. What motivation do you see for taking a stand on an important issue even when it is difficult to do so?Assignment: Application: Taking a StandTo complete:By Day 7Write a 4 to 5 page paper (page count does not include title and reference page) that addresses the following:Introduce the conceptual frameworks of the ethical constructs of ethics, moral, or legal standards and the purpose of the paper.Consider an ethical, moral, or legal dilemma that you have encountered in your work environment and describe it.Analyze the moral, ethical, and legal implications utilized in this situation. Describe your role as a moral agent or advocate for this specific issue.Consider your leadership styles identified by your self-assessment and determine if they act as a barrier or facilitation during this dilemma.The School of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements.Assignment: Application: Taking a StandTaking a StandNameInstitution  Taking a StandIntroductionLeadership is a management concept that can be interpreted as the capacity to influence others to achieve a common objective. For a leader to be effective, he or she must have unique qualities that include being rational, conscientious, open to new experiences, extroverted, dominant, and intelligent. These qualities allow the leader to identify any management problems and correct them (Ahmed, Azmi&Masood, 2013). Additionally, these qualities allow for the expression of expectations, going on to promote intelligence, rationality and careful problem solving among subordinates. In addition to these qualities, there are subtle that a leader should exhibit in order to be termed as effective. These include sharing information with subordinates, recognizing individual contributions, accepting both negative and positive criticism, and enable development among subordinates(Northouse, 2013). It is evident that a leader accepts a lot of responsibilities, particularly in making decisions and guiding the rest of the team. As such, the leader must exhibit the capacity to take a stand in decision making, to include those involving ethical and moral arguments.Assignment: Application: Taking a StandDiscussionLet us consider the case of two subordinates who occupy the same hierarchical position within an organization. Subordinate A is the son of the organization’s chairman and occupies a high social position. Subordinate B is of a low social class and does not have a social link with the organization’s upper management. The question then becomes, how should their supervisor punish them should they engage in comparable misconduct? Should the supervisor punish person B as indicated in the company policies while imposing a lesser punishment (or even pardoning) person A in consideration of links with the organization’s upper management. This is an ethical dilemma where the decision presents ethical options between exhibiting preferential treatment to maintain social links and upholding company policies as part of the responsibilities and work mandate.Assignment: Application: Taking a StandIt is undeniable that an effective leader must treat everybody equally. In fact, it is notable that although the supervisory position has been formally assigned as a title, it is not confined to the leader and includes subordinates. This follows that there is no supervisor without subordinates and there are no subordinates without the supervisor. This implies that the leader must be able to handle the punishment of subordinates A and B before considering the punishment as ethically right. In essence, the supervisor should practice the principle of treating others as he or she would like to be treated (Franz, 2012). This considers the definition of ethics as a philosophical terms for good and bad or right and wrong. It is concerned with the decision that should have been made consistently thereby questioning the concept of morality and introducing the notion of objectivity and subjectivity. In adding ethics, decisions must be objective and follow intuitive interpretation of what the majority would consider right and good with minimal objections(Nelson & Quick, 2012).Assignment: Application: Taking a StandIn the presented case, diversity is a liberal concept that the supervisor should cope with for the purpose of avoiding shortfall and procuring benefits for the organization. At its most basic, the supervisor should view it as concerned with inclusion and exclusion, a tool to be leveraged. Should the supervisor comprehensively delineate diversity (through inclusion of similarities and differences existing among the subordinates), then this can be turned into strategic relevance. In addition, there is likely to be less resistance from other subordinates if the supervisor can see himself or herself mirrored in the diversity delineation through differences in how they are treated, us-versus-them attitudes, stereotypes, assumptions, and preconceived expectations (O’Sullivan, Smith & Esposito, 2012).Assignment: Application: Taking a StandThe notion of ethics reinforces the idea that the subordinates’ performance is reliant on their perception of how they are treated by their superior and whether elements of fairness exist. In discussion ethical decisions made by leaders, it must be noted whether the leader has the capacity for higher moral reasoning. Firstly, the leader should be sympathetic and empathetic. This allows the leader to relate to the situation and make a decision that would not be problematic if reciprocated. Secondly, the leader should have been primed through experiences that allow for a better understanding of right and wrong. Thirdly, the leader should discard hedonistic moral arguments and apply pro-social moral arguments. For instance, shielding subordinates from undue criticism by others (Tannsjo, 2013). Finally, the leader should be self-serving in understanding that a morally wrong decision made now can have a negative impact on development within the organization in the future (Heinrichs, Oser&Lovat, 2013).Assignment: Application: Taking a StandOther than the presented arguments, the supervisor should apply principle-based ethics. It holds that a decision would remain morally right (irrespective of outcome) if it is in line with the company rules, duties and responsibilities as assigned to the personnel (Bowie, 2013). If there are clear company guideline on how the two subordinates should be punished, then the supervisor could apply principle-based ethics and implement the punishment. The supervisor has been assigned to a leadership position, and assumes the responsibilities and duties expected of that position to include punishing subordinates. In as much as the supervisor may be apprehensive of antagonizing subordinate A’s social backers and appearing as unfair to subordinate B’s backers, the supervisor must still ensure that the punishment are within the company guidelines. Even as the supervisor observes the company guidelines in dealing with the situation, he or she should still be aware that other subordinates will require punishment in the future. In observing the company guidelines for punishment, the supervisor’s decision reflects a highly developed ethical reasoning (Cianci et al., 2014). As such, the supervisor is best served as an effective leader by applying principle-based ethics when making the decision on how to punish subordinates’ A and B.Assignment: Application: Taking a StandConclusionOne must accept that a leader takes on a lot of responsibilities, one of which is decision making. In addition, one must acknowledge that decision making should be guided by the ethical principles of right and wrong. Also, the leader should develop higher levels of moral reasoning. This is particularly true for supervisors whose subordinates’ performance is reliant on their perception of how they are treated by their superior and whether elements of fairness exist. This include being sympathetic and empathetic, primed through experiences, discarding hedonistic moral arguments while applying pro-social moral arguments, and be self-serving while preparing for the future. Still, the most important aspect of a leader’s decision is the application of principle-based ethics, which holds that a decision would remain morally right if it is in line with the established rules, duties and responsibilities. As a result, the leader must exhibit the capacity to take a stand in decision making, to include those involving ethical and moral arguments.Assignment: Application: Taking a Stand  ReferencesAhmed, R., Azmi, N. & Masood, M. (2013). The Essence of Project Leadership is Significant to Project Management.Research Journal of Recent Science, 2(5), 44-48.Bowie, N. (2013). Business Ethics in the 21st Century. New York, NY: Springer.Cianci, A., Hannah, S., Roberts, R. &Tsakumis, G. (2014). The Effects of Authentic Leadership on Followers’ Ethical Decision-Making in the Face of Temptation: An experimental study. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 581-594.Franz, T. (2012). Group Dynamics and Team Interventions: Understanding and improving team performance. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.Heinrichs, K., Oser, F. &Lovat, T. (2013). Handbook of Moral Motivation: Theories, models, and applications. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Nelson, D. & Quick, J. (2012). Organizational Behavior: Science, the real world, and you (8thed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.Northouse, P. (2012). Leadership: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.O’Sullivan, P., Smith, M. & Esposito, M. (2012). Business Ethics: A critical approach. New York, NY: Routledge.Tannsjo, T. (2013). Understanding Ethics (3rded.). Edinburg: Edinburg University Press. Assignment: Application: Taking a Stand

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more